Thanks for the information and uploaded DAF into our mainframe system, but the
building jcl is failing with COND CODE 255.
We are running Z/OS V1.13.
Regards,
Chokalingam Thangavelu
Mobile - 00 -91-9686433224
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Please post complete message for abend 255 i have DAF though not use it so much
as have mxg/sas to process ENQ data but it does work ok..
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
If this is the message you received
AIF (D'SMFRECSOF).NOAO3
MNOTE 255,'**'
MNOTE 255,'* Allocation Optimizer (AO) Error*'
MNOTE 255,'**'
MNOTE
Hi,
We do not have following Datasets in our system.
SYS1.SGLOSAMP
SYS1.SASFPMAC
SYS1.SDVGMAC0
SYS1.SDBNUMAC
Regards,
Chokalingam Thangavelu
Mobile – 00 –91-9686433224
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette
In the code look for the phrase
RT_AO
Change to 000
In the source code FIND
** Installation Customization
*
CHECKDSN SETC 'YES' Check DSN (YES/NO)
GSNAPLIMIT SETC '010' SNAP Limit (nnn/000)
GTRACE SETC 'NO ' Trace (YES/NO)
GTRACEDD SETC 'DAFTRACE' Trace DDNAME
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 10:53:19 -0400, DanD wrote:
Device allocation for JES2 occurs at step initiation.
Each step would allocate a single device. If RETAIN was coded AVR would
recognize the mounted volume and reuse the same device for the next step.
Let's talk about DYNALLOC. AFAICT, DYNALLOC
On 1 Sep 2013 07:03:23 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On 9/1/2013 6:47 AM, Tom Russell wrote:
In the case of multiple steps each allocating one file on the same
tape, and no AFF parameter used, there was (is?) a significant
difference between JES2 and JES3.
For allocating tape
At 10:50 -0500 on 09/02/2013, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: UNIT=SEP
still alive (?):
Bruce Black once generously performed an experiment and concluded that
there's no way to DYNALLOC two or more data sets on the same volume
concurrently although JCL DD allocation has no problem with it. (Of
IIRC still need referback incrementing label as you go for multivolume files.
//DD1 LABEL=(1,SL)
//DD2 LABEL=(2,SL),VOL=REF=DD1
//DD3 LABEL=(3,SL),VOL=REF=DD2
In a message dated 09/02/13 15:31:09 Central Daylight Time, hal9...@panix.com
writes:
DISP=PASS handle this so the volume is not
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 17:05:23 -0500, efinnell15 wrote:
IIRC still need referback incrementing label as you go for multivolume files.
//DD1 LABEL=(1,SL)
//DD2 LABEL=(2,SL),VOL=REF=DD1
//DD3 LABEL=(3,SL),VOL=REF=DD2
Yes, but I was trying to use DYNALLOC. POSITION is easy, but
what's the SVC 99 TU
10 matches
Mail list logo
