On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Ed Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.comwrote:
On 9/26/2013 2:51 AM, Manfred Lotz wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a very old assembler program which still has a
SPLEVEL SET=2
statement at the beginning.
I think that these days this is obsolete and should be
Probably got 31 bit code instead of 24 bit only code.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Manfred Lotz
manfred.l...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Ed Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.comwrote:
On 9/26/2013 2:51 AM, Manfred Lotz wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a very old assembler
Manfred Lotz wrote:
I've got a very old assembler program which still has a SPLEVEL SET=2
statement at the beginning.
I think that these days this is obsolete and should be removed.
You can do that AFTER you have reviewed ALL called macros to see what
restrictions they're under. AFAIK some
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.comwrote:
Probably got 31 bit code instead of 24 bit only code.
The change is this:
SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2 yields:
GETMAIN RU,LV=(0),SP=0,LOC=(24,64) GETMAIN WORKAREA
+ DS0H
Charles,
I agree, that this may be too long for you to wait, but ...
I believe that this is quite normal for compiler errors;
they are not very common, and if you discover one, you are normally
forced to work around it, because the fix will not appear within hours,
as we have it with user
Ed,
IBM has been trying to impress the innocent with this Watson thing now
for many, many years.. but it will only confuse the innocent but because
it's Friday.. and we need to be positive.. I would make you listen to
David Attenborough ( To my fire up friend in OPM, nothing to do with
On 2013-09-26 05:51, Manfred Lotz wrote:
I've got a very old assembler program which still has a
SPLEVEL SET=2
statement at the beginning.
I think that these days this is obsolete and should be removed.
As I'm not sure if removing this could break anything what could I check
(besides
On 9/27/2013 1:21 AM, Manfred Lotz wrote:
The change is this:
[snip]
There is nothing to worry about. The two expansions make the identical
service call (as seen by the operating system), but the technique used
by the updated expansion is usable by programs that use the relative
immediate
I was talking to a friend who had heard there were discussions within IBM
about discontinuing Red Books and/or discontinuing the Red Book
residencies.
I find the red books extremely useful and would be disappointed if this
happens.
Has anyone else heard of this change of direction?
Alan
I also heard a rumor back in 2009. It was only a rumor
-- Original Message --
From: Alan Field alan_c_fi...@bluecrossmn.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Red Books
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:59:36 -0500
I was talking to a friend who had heard there were discussions within
In my opinion the Redbooks are one of the major differentiators between IBM
software and anything else. We rely heavily on the Redbooks to do our jobs and
educate the staff.
Jerry Whitteridge
Lead Systems Programmer
Safeway Inc.
925 951 4184
If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast
On 27 December 2012 01:28, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/12/20/arrests-maple-syrup-quebec.html
Well, another Friday... It seems there's going to be a Hollywood movie
about this caper - a “comedy with dramatic overtones”.
I have this vague recollection that this rumor ran through IBMMAIN a year or
so ago and was debunked.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Alan Field
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:00 AM
To:
I certainly hope the hero gets to rescue Sweet Nell from a fate worse than
death!
--
Donald Grinsell
State of Montana
406-444-2983
dgrins...@mt.gov
We fear things in proportion to our ignorance of them.
~ Titus Livius
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Softcopy reader sees a V2R1 collection.
No Enterprise COBOL 5 however ...
Don't see any Data Areas.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jousma, David
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 10:37 AM
To:
According to the announcement letter (213-293), planned availability is Sept.
30, 2013. (This coming Monday).
I would expect to see it then
snip
Looks like we are close to being able to order zOS 2.1 on shopZ.
_
Dave Jousma
353 files, and as threatened, only PDF. I will truly miss the Bookmanager ease
of search and navigation.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 11:33 AM
To:
The IBM Publications website yields 459 downloadable publications, all
PDFs, for the search argument 'z/OS V2R1'.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
SPLEVEL has not been changed since 1996.
Some macros will expand differently based on SPLEVEL.
So I'd say that if you truly want to see if there is any effect, you
either need to do a lot of analysis (of macro invocations and expansions)
or, as you mention, compare the assembler and/or object
I swapped a running sandbox sysres volume with my D/R sysres volume and
when I IPL'ed the D/R system I got an 0C4 in Ixglogr. I had no dump
file available so there's no diagnostic info.
Anyone have a clue what could be causing the 0C4. This is a z/OS 1.13.
My next step is to make sure I have
If you can get to LOGREC to run it thru another system, might get module and
offset. The support folks are pretty familiar with their components.
In a message dated 9/27/2013 4:56:18 PM Central Daylight Time,
john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu writes:
I had no dump
file available so there's no
21 matches
Mail list logo
