> You mention below that the way MVS loads APF modules (bypassing an
> unauthorized JOBLIB/STEPLIB module to load the same-named module
> from an APF library in the LNKLST) is needed for system integrity.
> Would integrity be compromised somehow more by (from my simplistic
> thinking) if I have
Gil,
Rexx doesn't have a sleep function, usually the call is external to running
environment
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
> On Dec 23, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:13:41 -0800, Ed Jaffe wrote:
>
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:13:41 -0800, Ed Jaffe wrote:
>On 12/23/2013 2:39 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>> I have been using //SLEEP EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH,PARM='SH sleep &SECONDSs' as a
>> delay step in some of my STCs to wait for things like TCPIP to get up first.
>> I know there are other options.
>> It
On 12/23/2013 2:39 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I have been using //SLEEP EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH,PARM='SH sleep &SECONDSs' as a
delay step in some of my STCs to wait for things like TCPIP to get up first. I know
there are other options.
It appears with my new z/OS 1.13 system, that prior to OMVS being u
_Hacked: Why Target became a target - JONATHAN FAHEY, Associated Press -
POLITICO.com_
(http://www.politico.com/story/2013/12/hacked-why-target-became-a-target-101447.html)
Making a list.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / si
Dave,
How can you execute a USS command without it being up ? If you need to sleep
you could use rexx if you had to ,,,I looked at the manual the sleep cmd hasn't
apparently changed
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
> On Dec 23, 2013, at 5
I have been using //SLEEP EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH,PARM='SH sleep &SECONDSs' as a
delay step in some of my STCs to wait for things like TCPIP to get up first. I
know there are other options.
It appears with my new z/OS 1.13 system, that prior to OMVS being up and
functioning, this sleep command just r
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:22:56 -0500, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
>
>If you REALLY want to fall back to JOBLIB if you do not find the
>module in STEPLIB, you can just add the libraries that are in JOBLIB
>but not in STEPLIB to the end of the STEPLIB concatenation. Changing
>the search order to not fal
At 20:05 + on 12/23/2013, DASDBILL2 wrote about Re: APF
authorization and JOBLIB DD card:
I suspect that using the STEPLIB or JOBLIB mutually exclusively
within one step was influenced heavily by the cost of "core" way
back when the TCB and the initiator were being designed, maximum
machi
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 12:48:15 -0600, Greg Dorner wrote:
>D SYMBOLS
>IEA007I STATIC SYSTEM SYMBOL VALUES
>&SYSALVL. = "2"
>&SYSCLONE. = "??"
>&SYSNAME. = ""
>&SYSPLEX. = ""
>&SYSR1.= "??"
>
I suspect that using the STEPLIB or JOBLIB mutually exclusively within one step
was influenced heavily by the cost of "core" way back when the TCB and the
initiator were being designed, maximum machine memory sizes were MUCH smaller
than today, CPU cycle time was much longer, etc. Many other de
Jim,
Obviously I don't have access to their source code, so I can't answer your
question. I do appreciate the patient responses you gave to my questions and
the help you (and others) gave me while I was trying to figure this one out.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discu
Peter,
I'm asking this follow-up question, not to be confrontational, but because I
would really like to know...
You mention below that the way MVS loads APF modules (bypassing an unauthorized
JOBLIB/STEPLIB module to load the same-named module from an APF library in the
LNKLST) is needed for
D SYMBOLS
IEA007I STATIC SYSTEM SYMBOL VALUES
&SYSALVL. = "2"
&SYSCLONE. = "??"
&SYSNAME. = ""
&SYSPLEX. = ""
&SYSR1.= "??"
&LOGON1. = ""
&LOGON2. = ""
You mean like
D M=STOR
which returns something like:
IEE174I 19.27.32 DISPLAY M 854
REAL STORAGE STATUS
ONLINE-NOT RECONFIGURABLE
0M-1536M
ONLINE-RECONFIGURABLE
NONE
PENDING OFFLINE
NONE
STORAGE INCREMENT SIZE IS 1M
==
Wayne Driscoll
OMEGAMO
Such as the amount assigned,the address ranges, etc.?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely both
Are you looking for a method a person can use or one that software can use?
If the former, it should be mentioned in the cover letter that accompanied
the maintenance.
:>: -Original Message-
:>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:>: Behalf Of mf db
:>
Long before 'RSU' was a twinkle in IBM's eye, we adopted a 'level
tracking' system based on an arbitrary alpha designation from A - Z. For
example, R13S. Each time maintenance is applied to the z/OS target zone,
the level is incremented and zapped into NUCLEUS. This field was chosen
decades ago
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/ibm/360/os/R19_Jun70/GC28-6628-5_System_Control_Blocks_Rel_19_Jun70.pdf
gives the layout of the TCB and the field names all begin with TCB. Page 282
and following.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LIST
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:11:59 +, Bob Shannon
wrote:
>It's a usermod to the operating system. CVTVERID is a customer-updatable field
>in CSECT IEACVT. We use it to verify which maintenance level we're using as
>we roll maintenance frequently. It can be browsed, viewed in storage, or
>disp
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:01:33 -0600, Andreas F. Geissbuehler wrote:
>TSO brought us Sub-Tasking and related macros ATTACH and DETACH
No, it didn't. ATTACH and DETACH were both described in IBM Operating
System/360 Concepts and Facilities, publication C28-6535-0, published in 1965.
http://bitsave
On 12/23/13 09:11, Bob Shannon wrote:
It's a usermod to the operating system. CVTVERID is a customer-updatable field
in CSECT IEACVT. We use it to verify which maintenance level we're using as we
roll maintenance frequently. It can be browsed, viewed in storage, or
displayed by some monitors
It's a usermod to the operating system. CVTVERID is a customer-updatable field
in CSECT IEACVT. We use it to verify which maintenance level we're using as we
roll maintenance frequently. It can be browsed, viewed in storage, or
displayed by some monitors such as MXI. It requiring zapping SYS1
Is it a seperate USERMOD on a particular reporting or Monitoring Product ?
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Bob Shannon wrote:
> > Is there a way to identify the RSU or fix level apart from SMPE panel
>
> We apply a usermod to write the RSU (or PUT) level in CVTVERID.
>
> Bob Shannon
> Rocket So
> Is there a way to identify the RSU or fix level apart from SMPE panel
We apply a usermod to write the RSU (or PUT) level in CVTVERID.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructio
Hi,
I have put a latest maintenance(Z/OS - 1.13) to one of our Sandbox
Operating system. Is there a way to identify the RSU or fix level apart
from SMPE panel ?
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruct
26 matches
Mail list logo
