At 19:45 -0500 on 02/13/2014, Micheal Butz wrote about Re: WER027A
control field beyond record:
SORT FIELDS=(150,4,4,4,A,158,17,A),FORMAT=BI
MODS.E35=(SORTEX,2,STEPLIB)
END
There are a number of records less than 158
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
I assume that your records are V not F
You can place is in a $ortparm dd statement.
Send me a message off line and I'll make sure we get it working
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 8:57 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
>
> I just have SORT FIELDS=
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 8:55 PM, "Longabaugh, Robert E"
I just have SORT FIELDS=
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 8:55 PM, "Longabaugh, Robert E"
> wrote:
>
> From many years ago I remember using EXEC PGM=SYNCSORT,PARM='VLTEST=0' in the
> JCL for sorting SMF records.
>
> I think VLTESTI is if you are using INCLUDE or OMIT.
>
>
> -O
>From many years ago I remember using EXEC PGM=SYNCSORT,PARM='VLTEST=0' in the
>JCL for sorting SMF records.
I think VLTESTI is if you are using INCLUDE or OMIT.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Micheal Butz
Sent: Thu
It's a parm on the EXEC (I think :)
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Micheal Butz
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 5:40 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: WER027A control field beyond record
>
> VL
VLTESTI=1. Cannt figure out were it goes
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 8:29 PM, Alan Field wrote:
>
> Isn't there a VLSHORT keyword you can specify that will prevent this
> error?
>
> Alan Field
> Technical Engineer Principal
> BCBS Minnesota
>
> Phone: 651.662.3546 Mobile: 6
Isn't there a VLSHORT keyword you can specify that will prevent this
error?
Alan Field
Technical Engineer Principal
BCBS Minnesota
Phone: 651.662.3546 Mobile: 651.428.8826
From: "Micheal Butz"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 02/13/2014 18:46
Subject:Re: WER027A contr
SORT FIELDS=(150,4,4,4,A,158,17,A),FORMAT=BI
MODS.E35=(SORTEX,2,STEPLIB)
END
There are a number of records less than 158
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 7:30 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
>
> Michael:
>
> There are several possibilities, but from no real description on what yo
Michael:
There are several possibilities, but from no real description on what
you are doing its difficult to suggest anything. ie no display of
sort control cards etc...
Ed
On Feb 13, 2014, at 6:31 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
Seems like one of my sort fields maybe beyond a short record
Anyt
Seems like one of my sort fields maybe beyond a short record
Anything I can do about this
This
Sent from my iPhone
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with t
I guess this is goodbye to paper manuals, eh
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Ed Gould
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 1:59 PM
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ibm-international-digital-publishing-
forum-12121.html
I've noticed that many of the Redbooks are now in epub as well as PDF
format. Makes them easier to read on my tablet. I like reading on my
tablet. Of course, it is a 10.1 inch one. My Kindle DX was better, but it
has broken .
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
> http://finance.yah
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ibm-international-digital-publishing-
forum-12121.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
The COBOL is Enterprise Version 5 under z/OS 2.1. My apologies for
appearing to confound operating system and compiler version numbers.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access i
On 13 Feb 2014 09:21:18 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:24:44 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
>
>>Clarke Morris wrote:
>>
>>
>>The problem is not the compiler options used for the COBOL generation
>>of CSP programs, the problem is the compiler options of the programs
On 13 Feb 2014 09:35:50 -0800, tmr...@stlvm20.vnet.ibm.com (Tom Ross)
wrote:
>>If other programs that handle files created by CSP (and maybe its
>>successors) were using NUMPROC(MIG) because it was more efficient than
>>NUMPROC(NOPFD), then those programs may have to be recompiled with
>>NUMPROC(N
Massimo,
I have not been able to reproduce your problem, but I am almost
certainly not doing exactly what you are doing.
When I open a COBOL 2.1 [INDEXED DYNAMIC] file for input, I get input
processing 1, output processing 0; when I open it for output, I get
input processing 0, output processing
>If other programs that handle files created by CSP (and maybe its
>successors) were using NUMPROC(MIG) because it was more efficient than
>NUMPROC(NOPFD), then those programs may have to be recompiled with
>NUMPROC(NOPFD) because there can be problems. I ran into that with a
>program that for wha
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:24:44 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
>Clarke Morris wrote:
>
>
>The problem is not the compiler options used for the COBOL generation
>of CSP programs, the problem is the compiler options of the programs
>that use the output from CSP programs.
>
>
>and I disagree. The problem h
On Feb 13, 2014, at 9:24 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
Clarke Morris wrote:
SNIP--
John Gilmore replied:
More generally, the traditional COBOL-shop aversion to recompiling is
one that urgently needs to be discarded. It was never sensible, and
it is no longe
Hi all,
I'm writing a program to query some system information. With SYSEVENT QVS
I'm able to get the defined capacity and actual 4hr usage.
Is there any way (macro function or control block) to get the Capacity Group
the Lpar is belonging to and the Capacity limit for that group?
Thanks f
Clarke Morris wrote:
The problem is not the compiler options used for the COBOL generation
of CSP programs, the problem is the compiler options of the programs
that use the output from CSP programs.
and I disagree. The problem here is one of incoherence. All of the
COBOL programs that access
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:42:32 -0500, Thomas H Puddicombe wrote:
>If your application didn't want any storage, why did it waste the system
>service's time by asking for none?
>
It might be that the size is variable, as John G. suggested, and 0 is so
unlikely that it is on average a greater waste of
These legacy constructs were known as model DSCBs, not model DCBs. I used them
a few times long ago.
Bill Fairchild
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas H Puddicombe"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:46:35 AM
Subject: Re: Storage Obtain .
It ha
No "S",
(g,d,r)
The model DSCBs - all allocated with SPACE=(TRK,0) - did at least once
result in a full VTOC making the rest of the space on the volume unusable.
Vacation Notice:
None currently scheduled
Tom Puddicombe
Principal Systems Engineer
Mainframe Performance & Capacity Planning
C
It has been tested - and validated - long ago, when GDG datasets had to
have model DCBs (this discovery lead to programmers being required to code
a default model DCB name in the JCL DD statement) until the model dcb
requirement was lifted many years later.
Vacation Notice:
None currently sch
If your application didn't want any storage, why did it waste the system
service's time by asking for none?
Vacation Notice:
None currently scheduled
Tom Puddicombe
Principal Systems Engineer
Mainframe Performance & Capacity Planning
CSC
31 Brookdale Rd, Meriden, CT 06450
ITIS | (860) 428-
In <033a01cf2784$19dffdf0$4d9ff9d0$@TheThomasResidence.us>, on
02/11/2014
at 05:50 PM, Jim Thomas said:
> MSTA R0
> MSTA R12
What are you trying to do? The second MSTA replaces the data stored by
the first.
> L R11,PSAAOLD-PSA
> SETLOCK OBTAIN,
In <035b01cf27fa$791cc6b0$6b565410$@TheThomasResidence.us>, on
02/12/2014
at 07:58 AM, Jim Thomas said:
>Twice because the first is for R0,R1 and the second is for R12,R13.
Isn't there just a single slot in the stack frame, so that the second
overlays the first?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
In
,
on 02/12/2014
at 07:44 AM, John McKown said:
>I thought FDR was the product (Fast Dump Restore) and IDP (Innovation
>Data Processing) was the company.
Whoops!
The mind is the second thing to go (I can't remember the first.)
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
In <035901cf27f9$5ee6d5c0$1cb48140$@TheThomasResidence.us>, on
02/12/2014
at 07:50 AM, Jim Thomas said:
>It's the workarea length ... 004C0 105 LCLDSCTL EQU
>*-LCLDSECT LENGTH OF LOCAL WORK AREA 0041
That depends on what "it" is;
>> L R1,=AL4(WORKAREA)
What is W
Two rather different situations need to be distinguished here. There
is 1) the case of code that always executes a STORAGE OBTAIN (or
GETMAIN) requesting zero bytes of storage, and there is 2) the case of
code that executes a STORAGE OBTAIN (or GETMAIN) for a calculated
number of bytes B, where B
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:10:54 +, DASDBILL2 wrote:
>
>This sounds like something that should be tested to make sure it would work
>this way.
>
Ah! Found it:
https://listserv.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0910&L=ibm-main&P=84168
(presumably space was available for DSCBs. Presumably STORAGE OB
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:10:54 +, DASDBILL2 wrote:
>If you are allocating such a data set with disposition=new, the request will
>fail if there is not at least one available (Format 0) DSCB in the VTOC which
>z/OS can change into a Format 1 DSCB in which to save all the information
>about you
If you are allocating such a data set with disposition=new, the request will
fail if there is not at least one available (Format 0) DSCB in the VTOC which
z/OS can change into a Format 1 DSCB in which to save all the information about
your new data set that occupies no real space. At least the
In a theoretical computer science class, one could debate the validity of
requesting 0 bytes of storage or of "successfully" acquiring 0 bytes of
storage. In the real world, such an event should be an error, but this quirk
is not going to be changed by IBM because of incompatibility issues. So
Hi all,
we started analyzing SMF62 to trace which A.S. use VSAM datasets and their
intent (Read or Update).
To do the task we analyze the SMF62MC1 flag (zOS 1.13).
So, a Cobol program does the following:
..
SELECT ARCAPPU ASSIGN TOTITAR02U
37 matches
Mail list logo
