I want to run a sort for a series of files that fit a dsname pattern.
The simple approach would be an E15 which runs thru the list of files, and
rexx is simpler than assembler.
Seems like SYNCSORT has had that option for a while.
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
In
caarmm9rptczsrhfjzecu8vmto_hvpfjnm0wn_amihxpjgxa...@mail.gmail.com,
on 02/21/2014
at 06:47 PM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net said:
It was surely clear from the context that I was speaking of the S/360
and its descendants.
That may have been your intent; it was clear to me that in channel
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:19:10 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
I want to run a sort for a series of files that fit a dsname pattern.
The simple approach would be an E15 which runs thru the list of files, and
rexx is simpler than assembler.
Seems like SYNCSORT has had that option for a while.
W dniu 2014-02-23 15:29, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:19:10 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
I want to run a sort for a series of files that fit a dsname pattern.
The simple approach would be an E15 which runs thru the list of files, and
rexx is simpler than assembler.
Seems
R.S.,
What about a Rexx Assembler stub ? The assembler routine to interface to the
sort and call Rexx to perform the desired functions.
We use IRXJCL a lot and it can also be called in C …
Regards,
Scott Ford
www.identityforge.com
From: R.S.
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014
R.S.
Heres the C program making the call:
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include string.h
typedef int (*funcPtr) ();
funcPtr fetched;
typedef struct IRXJCL_type
{
short int arg_length;
char argument[21];
} IRXJCL_type;
IRXJCL_type this_param;
IRXJCL_type* param_ptr;
int return_code;
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:44 AM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.comwrote:
Hmm, I'm not getting the same result! When I compile with ARCH(5) there is
only one strlen() call (SRST) and the value is retained in a register.
BTW, I removed #undef strlen. What is the purpose of that directive?
*
On 2014-02-23, at 07:49, R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2014-02-23 15:29, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:19:10 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
I want to run a sort for a series of files that fit a dsname pattern.
The simple approach would be an E15 which runs thru the list of files, and
Hello. I am new to assembler so not sure whether i am asking the right query?
We have a assembler copybook and the corresponding file is a VSAM KSDS. could
someone let me know how to view the data in the file using this copybook ?
Thanks
Ron T
to add , some of the fields in the copybook the data is stored in bit map. so
please do let me know how to view this data ?
Thanks
Ron T
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On 2/23/2014 10:23 AM, Ron Thomas wrote:
Hello. I am new to assembler so not sure whether i am asking the right query?
We have a assembler copybook and the corresponding file is a VSAM KSDS. could
someone let me know how to view the data in the file using this copybook ?
Thanks
Ron T
I would strongly suggest not to #undef such #defines coming from the
standard headers; the results may be unpredictable.
Maybe the compiler optimization and inlining strategies relies
exactly on such #defines, that is:
strlen needs to be __strlen, so that the compiler can recognize it
and do
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 10:53:58 -0700, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
wrote:
On 2/23/2014 10:23 AM, Ron Thomas wrote:
. . .
Really? I didn't think Assembler supported VSAM library source
for copy files.
Oh, wait. Are you z/OS or z/VSE?
I suspect he may mean that the copybook contains
An explanation, which is just a little more paranoid:
if you #undef strlen, the compiler cannot be sure, if your strlen
is not quite another function, which does not give the same result
on two subsequent calls ... ???
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: Curious observation:
I guess that IBM #defines some well known ANSI functions to
other strange names (__strlen for strlen, as an example), to be able
to do some special optimizations on those functions after or before
inlining them. Remember, the names of the ANSI functions are not
reserved in C - they are not part
Historically, the term 'builtin' is of course a PL/I one that has been
adopted elsewhere too, e.g., by the HLASM. In PL/I it refers to
implementation-supplied functions. Some of
these, like SQRT and COSH, are always implemented by calls to library
routines; some of them, like LENGTH and SIGN,
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de
wrote:
I would strongly suggest not to #undef such #defines coming from the
standard headers; the results may be unpredictable.
Maybe the compiler optimization and inlining strategies relies
exactly on such
Just for future reference, since the name of this list-server is IBM Mainframe
Discussion List, what particular IBM systems, other than System/360 and its
descendants, are also called mainframe systems?
Bill Fairchild
Nolensville, TN
- Original Message -
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour
If you have IBM File Manager you can read the file using FM and give it the
copy book as a template.
Otherwise, you will need to perform an IDCAMS PRINT DUMP command and work
out the contents from the copy book lay out and the dump format content.
//DUMP EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
I did this in REXX a different way.
In my case, I wanted to produce multiple SORTOUTS but the same could apply
for multiple input files.
I used a SYSINnn DD statement and a SYSPARMnn DD.
DO I = 1 to files
CALL SYSIN(I)
CALL SYSPARMI(I)
CALL SPOOL(I)
CALL SYSPOOL(I)
CALL ALLOCA(I)
ADDRESS
JCL:
//S010 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSEXEC DD DISP=SHR,DSN=REXXLIB
//SYSTSIN DD DISP=SHR,DSN=DSNTYPE(SORTVAL)
//SYSIN1 DD DSN=DSNTYPE(SYSIN1),DISP=SHR
//SYSIN2 DD DSN=DSNTYPE(SYSIN2),DISP=SHR
//SYSIN3 DD DSN=DSNTYPE(SYSIN3),DISP=SHR
How popular/common is IBM File Manager? Looks kinda neat, I just never came
across it (but I tend to work at a different layer, so that proves little
except that it likely isn't super-ubiquitous).
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have IBM File
We use the IBM Early Development Systems in Dallas, File Manager comes with
the package. We have a customer who uses File Manager and it's also part of
the ADCD set. For corporates, I guess it depends on cost/need since some
shops will have 3rd party alternates like File Aid or Easytrieve etc.
In
Hello ,
Any idea why MVS class C3 commands take so long to execute . We were adding
some new volumes on z/os 1.11 system and had to issue several route
commands to vary them online . It seems like console address space can't
process more than 50 commands at a time . We had to clear the command
Right. There is an XLC compiler option ANSIFUNCS or something like that. (Too
lazy to look it up.) It tells the compiler things that have the names of
standard functions really ARE standard functions. Without that option turned
on, strlen() could be a private random number generator.
Charles
On 23/02/2014 11:55 PM, John McKown wrote:
I don't know why that would make a difference.
Would you mind showing me your compile parameters? What version of z/OS are
you running on? My compile came from a z/OS 1.13 system. I don't know the
maintenance level.
z/OS 1.13
c99_x -O
Hi,
I mentioned this a few weeks ago, so that no one would complain (like last
time) when I gave out the coupons at share for the free licenses of the
automation software. As of today, only 32 people have contacted me to get
them, and of them only 21 followed through with actually getting the
Dear all,
Can I have z/OS 1.9 under z/VM 6.3 on a zBC12 or zEC12?
Thanks
Jose Munoz
E: jmunoz6...@gmail.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
We have fileaid and i belive it only supports cobol and PL/1. Can this copybook
be converted to PL/1 and whether we can edit the bit maps and manupulate the
same , i.e 1 byte 8 bits and each bit whether we can edit something ?
Thanks
Ron T
I'm checking into to the old folks home soon. Instead of using -O5, I used
-o5. Which did not cause any problem because that means write the output
object code to the file named 5. I guess I was sleepier than I thought
yesterday and just didn't catch that.
My error, and my thanks to all for your
Dang C case-sensitivity!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 5:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Curious observation: lack of a simple optimization in a C
On 24/02/2014 9:58 AM, John McKown wrote:
I'm checking into to the old folks home soon. Instead of using -O5, I used
-o5. Which did not cause any problem because that means write the output
object code to the file named 5. I guess I was sleepier than I thought
yesterday and just didn't catch
Hi,
Here are a couple of examples that show how to invoke DFSORT from REXX.
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ice1ca60/11.3?
Further if you have any questions please let us know
Kolusu
DFSORT Development
IBM Corporation
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi:
Maybe I am misunderstanding the original op statement.
I *THOUGHT* that the original op was doing :
sort field=(1,5,ch,a)
sort e15=(rexxe15,...)
end
//
Somewhere before this they had compiled a rexx program (using the
rexx compiler)
Is that what the original op did, if not
The short answer is yes. And you don't need to get the extended end of life
updates for z/os 1.9 to do it.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
Hi,
I need to convert a customized binary version of a TCP/IP translation table to
the source version.
Is there a way to do this?
I know that the CONVXLAT program will do the reverse.
Thanks
Gadi
לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי חברת מלם מערכות בעמ ו/או כל חברת בת
ASM to PL/I should be quite simple.
PL3 becomes FIXED DEC(3,0) etc.
CL6 becomes CHAR(6),
BL1 becomes BIT(8) (I think)
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Ron Thomas ron5...@gmail.com wrote:
We have fileaid and i belive it only supports cobol and PL/1. Can this
copybook be converted to
And I think COBDFSYM has promise: Provides a way to map records based on
COBOL Copybook for DFSORT.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs:
Sri Hari,
I think the original question was about using REXX in an E15 exit (or
equivalently an E35).
This is something I've contemplated doing in the past but the required
machinery is beyond me (or at least my patience). :-)
I'm also not sure about performance and function : If each pass
W dniu 2014-02-24 01:14, baby eklavya pisze:
Hello ,
Any idea why MVS class C3 commands take so long to execute .
What is class C3?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego
40 matches
Mail list logo
