Hi,I am looking for COBOL compiler option to compile our COBOL programs in 64
Bit mode.Please lead me if you have such a experience .The COBOL version is 4.2
on Z9 with z/OS 1.12.Best regardsManshadi
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 01:44:35 +0100, Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de
wrote:
It is normal practice at the shops I work to do EXPLAIN regularly on all
programs that go into production and to store the PLAN TABLE results
for later trouble shooting ... if there is trouble. The developers at
BTW:
when we installed the tool in the mid 90s, IIRC,
and when we defined the first rule set for our DB2 programs
(I was in charge then to define the rules together with the DB2 admins,
because I started in 1992 to do the DB2 classes for our DB2 developers),
we then did a first check on all the
On Fri, 9 Jan 2015 09:58:03 -0500, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I'm one of those types.
The governor pretty well guarantees a re-submission.
Which means twice the resources (or more) spent to do nothing!
How can they debug/tune something if we don't let complete?
That does seem to be a
z/OS 2.1 Cobol 5.1 still limited to 31 bit mode.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSQ2R2_9.0.1/com.ibm.ent.cbl.zos.doc/migrate/igymsoacb51.html?lang=en
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Mehrshad Manshadi
0056e0e17177-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
Hi,I am looking for COBOL
A reasonable question to the Original Poster (OP) is what are you hoping
to achieve with 64 bit?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs:
I believe that SETRP RECORD has never required authorization.
That would make the doc update a doc correction.
FWIW, ESTAE(X)'s TERM=YES is something else that (a bit surprisingly,
perhaps, when you think about why someone typically uses TERM=YES) does
not require authorization.
Peter Relson
