Thanks for pointing out %08X (pad 8-character field with zeroes to exceed
default precision). I'm not that big on C/C++ as yet, still learning. So are
IBM z/UNIX programmers, apparently.
Ant.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
On Apr 21, 2016 9:33 PM, "Anthony Thompson"
wrote:
>
> The error reason is actually 0B7F1C00, it's the C/C++ library functions
being called from within copytree command (like printf, fprint, etc) that
drop leading zeroes. I've seen it many times in error messages from
Or they could use "%08X" to tell printf to tag on the leading zeros - no
counting needed.
Here's one that always looks strange to me:
"You have 1 records"
I think that *does* take some extra C coding to fix unless someone can
tell me some printf tricks.
Years ago I wrote some assembler
The error reason is actually 0B7F1C00, it's the C/C++ library functions being
called from within copytree command (like printf, fprint, etc) that drop
leading zeroes. I've seen it many times in error messages from z/UNIX commands
. It is fixable in C/C++ code, but the programmer needs to count
Hi,
I believe that the problem is that my original presentations on this topic
showed using the existing classes/group to determine the new class/group.
Unfortunately, that was function that did not make shipped support. (I have
updated the examples in my most recent presentations). For
Some materials that may be useful to teachers of IBM mainframe Assembler
Language are now available on the Marist College web site, along with the
text itself.
The two items are PDFs with (1) lecture slides for Chapters 1-8 (sorry, I
ran out of time before I could do the rest), and (2) pages
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:29:26 +, Tracy Adams wrote:
>Awesome! Yes, who would think to check the Z/OS (jes) log for a failure in
>USS (I did check
>the /var/logs but since the REXX was being invoked via batch I should have
>looked!
>
>There was a glowing message that
Awesome! Yes, who would think to check the Z/OS (jes) log for a failure in USS
(I did check the /var/logs but since the REXX was being invoked via batch I
should have looked!
There was a glowing message that bpxroot was revoked. Unrevoked it and the
seteuid now works :-)
Thanks!!
Nims,Alva John , Al wrote:
You think 3 packs was crazy, for a time I worked with up to 10 packs, now it
did include the entire SMPe data sets, but what we did there was include the
primary res volume ID as part of the data set name, yep, the copy job was huge
process. Eventually the SMPe
You think 3 packs was crazy, for a time I worked with up to 10 packs, now it
did include the entire SMPe data sets, but what we did there was include the
primary res volume ID as part of the data set name, yep, the copy job was huge
process. Eventually the SMPe data sets were converted to
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:50:20 +, Tracy Adams wrote:
> Yes, I am allowed to su with no complaints
Ok. And I saw in another post you confirmed the Reason code (errnojrs) that is
being displayed back to you (although it doesn't look correct). Did you
check syslog at
Yes, I am allowed to su with no complaints
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New to RACF
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:01:25 +,
Thanks, I will join that list as well :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New to RACF
If you were not aware, there is
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:01:25 +, Tracy Adams wrote:
>I am new to RACF so I apologize for stupid questions...
>
>I am running a REXX script under USS to clone the HFS/ZFS files from one
>system to another. IBM provides a nice sample called copytree in the
>/samples/ dir
Thanks, I confirm that that line is copied correctly I guess that narrows
it down to 16 different possibilities :-) I will pull up the c00x codes to see
where it leads me, probably to a call to IBM.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
If you were not aware, there is a list for RACF
To join, if you have not done so, use this URL
RACFhttp://www.listserv.uga.edu/archives/racf-l.html
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Tracy Adams
>
On 21 April 2016 at 12:01, Tracy Adams wrote:
> seteuid 0
> Error codes: 0 -1 A4 B7F1C00
> EMVSSAF2ERR: SAF/RACF error
>
> Dubious nothing has changed in the RACF world and this use to work. The only
> thing I can find is that the userid needs acc(read) to bpx.superuser
We use through to have a 5 pack resvol set (note these include
OMVS related HFS/ZFS - hence the number/sizes) and have no issues. Biggest
problem I have is folks inadvertently recataloging the datasets from their
indirect values while doing maintenance so we locked down the Master Cat such
I am new to RACF so I apologize for stupid questions...
I am running a REXX script under USS to clone the HFS/ZFS files from one system
to another. IBM provides a nice sample called copytree in the /samples/ dir of
USS. This utility has run fine for us in the past. Now when I execute it with
On 4/20/2016 7:25 PM, Steve Beaver wrote:
DISASM is a nice little "gimme" but I don't think it's been updated in
years. You might find yourself
Doing a lot of coding of DISASM to get it functional for 32 and 64 bit code
I believe you are thinking about a different "DISASM" than the support
http://www.amazon.com/Complaint-Department-Grenade-PINEAPPLE-CD-4/dp/B00APBED0C
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Chris Hoelscher wrote:
> Take a number .
>
> Chris Hoelscher
> Technology Architect, Database Infrastructure Services
> Technology Solution Services
> :
At one shop I worked at a long time ago, we had a 6 pack Sysres system.
They were all 3390 Mod9s. It worked quite well.
Currently our only issue is the OMVS datasets needed. We have put those on a
Sysres volume that is a 3390 Mod54 with all other SYSRES volumes being a 3390
Mod27. We may
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:25:48 -0500, Steve Beaver wrote:
>DISASM is a nice little "gimme" but I don't think it's been updated in
>years. You might find yourself
>Doing a lot of coding of DISASM to get it functional for 32 and 64 bit code
I just looked at it for the first time. It seems to
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 21:06:21 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote:
>Tom Marchant wrote:
>
>>Why not make your STC run AMODE 64, at least part of the time?
>
>Yeah, that's an option, but it's a lot more work and has other possible
>impacts
It's not that hard.
STMG R2,R15,SAVE64save 64-bit
Lucas Rosalen wrote:
As far as I have seen, it's quite simple: create a symbol (using
and changing last char from 1 to 2, for example) and update MCAT
accordingly.
Once I've worked for a client that had 3-volumes respack. It indeed worked.
We used to keep datasets like LINKLIB, MACLIB,
As far as I have seen, it's quite simple: create a symbol (using
and changing last char from 1 to 2, for example) and update MCAT
accordingly.
Once I've worked for a client that had 3-volumes respack. It indeed worked.
We used to keep datasets like LINKLIB, MACLIB, NUCLEUS, etc in 1st volumes
Hello,
>From the z/OS 2.1, I have started using Mod-27 as the Load address(Respack)
for IPLing the z/OS 2.1 LPAR. I am curious how the other Shops are managing
when they do not options of using Mod-27 and they have to survive with
Mod-9. I believe the Extended Indirect cataloging is one Options.
It's gonna run in the mode of the TSO issuer As a supported command it
should be updated to recognize the new ARCHLVL's for the new machine
instructions but it doesn't have to execute them.
In a message dated 4/20/2016 9:26:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
st...@stevebeaver.com writes:
Theo,
OK found the description for ARC1220I Reason Code 36
*The MIGRATE DATASETNAME command is issued with TRANSITION keyword, but the
ACS routines return a management class, storage class, [image: Start of
change]and storage group that match the existing assigned constructs or
management class,
Theo,
I see you have posted this on IBMMAIN.
What we need to know is what is ARC1220I reason code 36
Reason Code 36 is not listed in the Message and Codes manual.
Richard
073 289 9246
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Buckton, T. (Theo)
wrote:
> OK Richard, come let
30 matches
Mail list logo