Re: Rename in-process catalog issue

2016-11-28 Thread Rob Schramm
And now for the answer http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA36138 Turns out that issuing the DELETE NOSCRATCH on a 2.1 system can have a better effect (RACF/ACF2/TSS willing) and will clean up the mystery bit that gets set during a failed ALTER NEWNAME. Rob Schramm On Tue, Nov

Re: Rename in-process catalog issue

2016-11-28 Thread retired mainframer
It helps if you show us the command you issued and the exact error message you received, including the msg ID. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Rob Schramm Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 9:46 PM To:

Re: TSO Setup on SSH

2016-11-28 Thread David Crayford
On 29/11/2016 11:57 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote: David Crayford wrote: the midnight command port which has weird key bindings. On *nix I live in Midnight Commander ... there's a port for z/OS? Yep. It's part of Rockets ported tools http://www.rocketsoftware.com/ported-tools. Do you run it

Re: TSO Setup on SSH

2016-11-28 Thread Edward Gould
> On Nov 28, 2016, at 8:16 AM, Paul Gilmartin > <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 17:10:17 -0600, Edward Gould wrote: >> >> If you don’t like EBCDIC go play in the ASCII world. >> > Oh, I do! this forum is conducted in ASCII, isn't it? Yes however

Re: TSO Setup on SSH

2016-11-28 Thread Jack J. Woehr
David Crayford wrote: the midnight command port which has weird key bindings. On *nix I live in Midnight Commander ... there's a port for z/OS? Do you run it from OMVS or just when you ssh in? -- Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of www.well.com/~jax #

Re: TSO Setup on SSH

2016-11-28 Thread David Crayford
On 29/11/2016 9:18 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:40:11 +0800, David Crayford wrote: ISPF does surprisingly well with UNIX files tagged UTF-8. Agreed. IMO, ISPF has very good support for z/OS UNIX now. I spend most of my time in a shell but ISPF sure beats using the

Re: IBM doc page - down or dead?

2016-11-28 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:23:18 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote: >Gord, > >The correct link is > >http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/ > >You are missing the library before bkserv > Well, last week, a google search for: rexx unix site:ibm.com ... returned many useful, effective

Re: IBM doc page - down or dead?

2016-11-28 Thread Sri h Kolusu
Gord, The correct link is http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/ You are missing the library before bkserv Kolusu From: Gord Tomlin To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 11/28/2016 03:17 PM Subject:IBM doc page - down or dead? Sent

IBM doc page - down or dead?

2016-11-28 Thread Gord Tomlin
The page I use to reach IBM manuals has been unavailable all day. I get IBM's usual 404 page instead. http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/ Is anyone able to reach this page? Can anyone at IBM comment on whether this page is intentionally missing? -- Regards, Gord Tomlin Action

Re: Catalogs in a SYSPLEX

2016-11-28 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
As noted earlier in this thread, sysres datasets should be cataloged with volser ** and unit . That tells the system to look on the currently IPLed sysres regardless of volume name. BTW I don't subscribe to the floating MCAT strategy. Our master catalog lives away from sysres and

Re: Catalogs in a SYSPLEX

2016-11-28 Thread Ken Smith
I like this approach! But I thought certain data sets used in NIP and early phases of IPL had to be in the master cat, e.g., SYS1.LPALIB which presumably is in your SYSRES cat? How does it work? Ken On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:28 AM, van der Grijn, Bart (B) < bvandergr...@dow.com> wrote: > We

AW: Re: STC as batch

2016-11-28 Thread Peter Hunkeler
> Look up "started jobs" in the fine manuals. That will not make it a "batch job". -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the

New z/XDC Release and C Language support

2016-11-28 Thread Calin Cole
A brief announcement to the community: Today we are publishing a new release of z/XDC. Notably it extends support to the IBM XL C/C++ and Metal C Languages. For details please see our release page at: http://www.colesoft.com/release-z2-2/ Calin Cole ColeSoft Marketing 414 Third Street, NE

Re: TSO Setup on SSH

2016-11-28 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:32:08 +0530, venkat kulkarni wrote: >Thanks for reply. I am looking for free tool for making this setup work .Do >we have any solution. > Cygwin is free (= very attractive price). But the setup is tedious although the benefits are enormous (you can almost pretend you don't

Re: TSO Setup on SSH

2016-11-28 Thread venkat kulkarni
Thanks for reply. I am looking for free tool for making this setup work .Do we have any solution. On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:24:24 +0530, venkat kulkarni wrote: > > > >I think, we still need

Re: Couplexx values for sysplex - Query

2016-11-28 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
I understand your point. Still suggest you look first at the system weight values in SFM. They establish a prioritized 'queue' of systems that will get partitioned out in case the sysplex hangs. . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS

Re: TSO Setup on SSH

2016-11-28 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:24:24 +0530, venkat kulkarni wrote: > >I think, we still need solution of the this issue that how do we transfer >MVS sequential or PDS dataset using SFTP. > I can do it with Cygwin and ssh rather than SFTP. Are Cygwin and ssh available to you? The price is very

Re: TSO/E LOGON recovery?

2016-11-28 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 08:25:57 -0600, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: > >Paul, is this not a rehash of your thread 'CANCEL TSO Logon?' in January 2015? > It is. Apologies. Perhaps my memory is short, not refreshed by sufficient recurrences of the situation; perhaps I was overwhelmed by the flood of

Re: TSO Setup on SSH

2016-11-28 Thread John McKown
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote: > Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >> Wordpad is 50% better. It understands UNIX files on input but always >> saves as DOS. >> >> Notepad++ accepts DOS, UNiX and Classic Mac files and saves by default >> in the input format. Or the

Re: TSO Setup on SSH

2016-11-28 Thread Jack J. Woehr
Paul Gilmartin wrote: Wordpad is 50% better. It understands UNIX files on input but always saves as DOS. Notepad++ accepts DOS, UNiX and Classic Mac files and saves by default in the input format. Or the user can select the output format. Any Windows user who interacts with Unix, z/OS,

Re: TSO Setup on SSH

2016-11-28 Thread Jack J. Woehr
David Crayford wrote: Don't whine! If you're unhappy with scp then why don't you port it to do what you want? Two reasons: 1. Life is short and I'm both familiar with the porting process for OpenSSH and quite busy. 2. Everything works fine on IBM i, the IBM system I use the most!

Re: TSO/E LOGON recovery?

2016-11-28 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Paul Gilmartin wrote: >> LOGON >> userid >> IKJ56410I COMMAND NOT ACCEPTED DURING LOGON >> LOGON >> One might expect that when it prompts with "LOGON" it would accept a userID. Paul, is this not a rehash of your thread 'CANCEL TSO Logon?' in January 2015? John McKown wrote: >​That is

Re: TSO Setup on SSH

2016-11-28 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 17:10:17 -0600, Edward Gould wrote: > >If you don’t like EBCDIC go play in the ASCII world. > Oh, I do! this forum is conducted in ASCII, isn't it? On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 18:14:01 -0600, John McKown wrote: > >> scp is universally outside z/OS a binary transfer protocol which

Re: TSO/E LOGON recovery?

2016-11-28 Thread John McKown
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:30:16 +1100, Wayne Bickerdike wrote: > > >Did you hit PA1 and follow the logon prompt? > > > I get: > > LOGON > userid > IKJ56410I COMMAND NOT ACCEPTED DURING LOGON

Re: TSO/E LOGON recovery?

2016-11-28 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:30:16 +1100, Wayne Bickerdike wrote: >Did you hit PA1 and follow the logon prompt? > I get: LOGON userid IKJ56410I

Re: STC as batch

2016-11-28 Thread Allan Staller
Look up "started jobs" in the fine manuals. Is it possible to invoke a STC by submitting a batch Job ? If so will it just run by adding Job card ? I am sorry for being ignorant. Any suggestions would help. HTH, ::DISCLAIMER::

Re: Couplexx values for sysplex - Query

2016-11-28 Thread baby eklavya
Hello Skip , Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this . Appreciate your time and effort to help me out . The reason for implementing difference is that we have had weird issues on few of the pre-prod systems which are unfortunately a part of the production plex . We wanted to have these

Re: TSO Setup on SSH

2016-11-28 Thread David Crayford
On 28/11/2016 2:14 PM, Jack J. Woehr wrote: David Crayford wrote: He does! We all do. Most of the people whinging about EBCDIC on here also work on *nix systems. EBCDIC is a terrible anachronism but unfortunately we're stuck with it. I do indeed play on *nix. I came to traditional IBM