Re: IBM Unveils New IBM Z with Pervasive Encryption

IBM's announcement letters for July 17, 2017, are now going live across the time zones, starting with Asia-Pacific and Japan. (Presumably over the next few hours the versions of these announcements for other geographies will go live.) Please watch the wrap! There's a great deal to absorb here, and

IBM Unveils New IBM Z with Pervasive Encryption

IBM's press release is available here: https://www.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/52805.wss Timothy Sipples IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems, AP/GCG/MEA E-Mail:

Re: CICS Logstreams

Remember terminology for us here on the Listserv is important. Wrong words can be misleading.. On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:20 PM Mohamed Gomaa < 00cefc9a9b79-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > I think you mean use your favorite not user > > Thanks > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jul 16,

Re: Any IBM pSeries gurus out there?

Mike, I sent you separate email. Contact me offline. Thanks, Steve Estle -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: CICS Logstreams

I think you mean use your favorite not user Thanks Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 16, 2017, at 8:03 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote: > > I think you mean looking not locking > > User your favorite internet browser and use the phrase > > cics logstream define installation

Re: CICS Logstreams

I think you mean looking not locking User your favorite internet browser and use the phrase cics logstream define installation You will find what you need. Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Mohamed

CICS Logstreams

I am locking for setting CICS log stream using structure in sysplex and for recovery purpose we want to use staging dataset. I am locking for policy sample to define it Thanks Mohamed Juma -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: Sort Question

On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 07:38:36 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote: >>>... all challenges for DFSORT; some not algorithmically solvable. >' >Can you send me a sample of data with all the challenging scenarios and I >will *try* to see if I can solve it. For a fully tested solution it would >be only on

Re: Sort Question

>>... all challenges for DFSORT; some not algorithmically solvable. Paul, ' Can you send me a sample of data with all the challenging scenarios and I will *try* to see if I can solve it. For a fully tested solution it would be only on Monday. Thanks, Kolusu IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: Sort Question

>>>Thanks!… I would never have gotten that without a lot of testing. Also I did not know the first “field” was limited to 30. I learned several things today. Edward, As retired mainframer pointed out, it was MY assumption about the length being 30. You can have whatever you want. Just change

Re: Sort Question

On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:18:41 -0500, Edward Gould wrote: >One of my users asked me this question and I am not quite clear on how to >respond. >Given an email address aaa...@bbb.com (example) > >He just wants to sort on the field before the @ and then for a secondary sort

Re: Sort Question

On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 22:52:47 -0500, Edward Gould wrote: >> On Jul 15, 2017, at 10:39 PM, Sri h Kolusu wrote: >> >> Edward, >> >> Here is a DFSORT JCL which will give you the desired results. I assumed >> that your input file is FB and 80 bytes

Re: Need Hep with HIDS and z/OS

Thanks to all who responded . As a novice in this area, I have many questions. What is the increase in CPU with any intrusion detection product ? . When is intrusion detected ? Meaning in real time when the event happens or is it logged/posted later on a some report ? --

Re: Need Hep with HIDS and z/OS

Charles Mills wrote >"log user actions and tie said actions back to that user via a unique >identifier" >That is not intrusion detection. Intrusion detection is a good thing, but it >is basically looking for outsiders trying to get in. (Loosely speaking.) Not >known users doing good and

Re: Running unsupported is dangerous was Re: AW: Re: LE strikes again

Scott Ford wrote: >But from a application point of view, if the application is using AT/TLS >and there are Pagent protection policies for PORTS/IP addresses and the >application is using encryption, where's the risk ??? There's plenty of risk when running an unsupported, unpatched release. Even

Re: Sort Question

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Edward Gould > Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2017 8:53 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Sort Question > > > On Jul 15, 2017, at 10:39 PM, Sri h Kolusu