On 14/05/2018 3:16 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
OOREXX solves many of the problems in classic REXX.
And it retains many of them. Like being typeless and lacking lexical
scoping.
I never found writing REXX function packages to be difficult.
Maybe not difficult for some but it's significant
Hello,
This command didn't worked for me and getting same issue.
On Sun, May 13, 2018, 11:21 PM Lucas Rosalen
wrote:
> Hi Venkat,
>
> What about using the syntax below?
>
> "MVS SEND 'your_message' USER(user) NOW"
>
>
>
> -
Heretic indeed! I've been a Rexx user for 35+ years, so I'm at least used to
it. Have written entire products in it, published a book about it, so
(surprise) I disagree.
I believe that Rexx's biggest weakness was that it came from IBM back when
IBM was considered Bad by the non-IBM community. I
Tx.
בתאריך יום ב׳, 14 במאי 2018, 4:56, מאת Mike Schwab :
> https://www.youtube.com/user/moshe5760/videos He's been capturing
> Turnkey 4 on Hercules how to videos.
>
> Here is the cloud offer Video.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuXi1DLq1Sw
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:50 PM, ITschak Mugzac
https://www.youtube.com/user/moshe5760/videos He's been capturing
Turnkey 4 on Hercules how to videos.
Here is the cloud offer Video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuXi1DLq1Sw
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:50 PM, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> Mike, we have the license, just want to move to cloud. Btw,
On Mon, 14 May 2018 00:12:54 +, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
>I was hopeful that the IEZIOB would include the missing fields. Unfortunately
>it does not. Before opening an SR with IBM, I thought I'd give the List one
>more shot. The $BUFFER macro changed in z/OS 2.2; we're jumping from 2.1 to
Mike, we have the license, just want to move to cloud. Btw, who is noshix?
Itschak
בתאריך יום ב׳, 14 במאי 2018, 4:47, מאת Mike Schwab :
> Moshix has a Turnkey 4 Hercules Linux server on Amazon cloud. Ask him
> for an account for personal testing.
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 1:48 PM, ITschak Mu
Moshix has a Turnkey 4 Hercules Linux server on Amazon cloud. Ask him
for an account for personal testing.
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 1:48 PM, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> Need your zPDT users advice. We want to move from local server to Amazon
> hosting. if I recall correctly, at list Scott Ford once
I was hopeful that the IEZIOB would include the missing fields. Unfortunately
it does not. Before opening an SR with IBM, I thought I'd give the List one
more shot. The $BUFFER macro changed in z/OS 2.2; we're jumping from 2.1 to 2.3
using code carried unmodified for decades (!).
The following
On Sun, 13 May 2018 19:16:36 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>OOREXX solves many of the problems in classic REXX.
>
>I never found writing REXX function packages to be difficult.
>
THere's a lack of closure. Why can't a command (ADDRESS) environment
be implemented in Rexx?
On Sun, 13 May 2018 19:
I'm comfortablewith using Unix files. I'm not comfortable with packaging for
MVS components that seems done by people without a clue, but it's not fair to
blame that on the use of Unix.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM
1. m$ started with QDOS, not CP/M
2. CP/M was influence by RT-11
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 10:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.ed
Hi Venkat,
What about using the syntax below?
"MVS SEND 'your_message' USER(user) NOW"
---
*Lucas Rosalen*
rosalen.lu...@gmail.com / lucas.rosal...@ibm.com
http://br.linke
All symbols are case insensitive. Talis are case sensivtive:
bar='baz'
say f.bar
say foo.BAR
say FOO.bar
say FOO.BAR
will give 4 identical outputs, but change that first line to bar='BAZ' and
you're talking about a different variable.
You can use the value BIF to get expressions
I feel compelled to use Perl because of its expressive power and the massive
library available at CPAN, but I consider it ugly. I'd really prefer a language
with regex syntax for people who aren't limited to slow teletypes, more in the
style of ICON, SNOBOL or Wylbur.
As for REXX, it is a very
We all have our favorite candidates for worst language ever. I lean to C, but
there are other worthy contestants.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
David Crayford
Sent: Friday, Ma
I'm at a loss as to why anybody would pay good money for cheese, given that the
Moon is made of the stuff. It's hard to understand the reason for something
when it isn't true in the first place. The fact that you prefer other languages
doesn't make them better.
Is REXX perfect? No way. But then
REXX already supports issuing authorized commands for supported environments,
e.g., TSO. It's not particularly difficult to add a new environment to REXX,
but executing APF authorized commands safely in that environment is not for the
faint of heart.
OS/2 has something similar to shebang called
OOREXX solves many of the problems in classic REXX.
I never found writing REXX function packages to be difficult.
I don't care for Perl syntax, but between its expressive power and the massive
CPAN I find myself using it regardless.
That said, I find that REXX has a much cleaner syntax for scri
It's not from IBM, but IEBUPDTX blows IEBUPDTE and IEBUPDAT away.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Edward Gould
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2018 5:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
S
And the man ate fish for a day
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 12:06 PM, venkat kulkarni <
venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Lucas,
>
> Your solution worked for me
>
> "SUBMIT 'USR1.REXX.CNTL(REXXJCL)'" .
>
> Now, I am trying to issue tso send command using this rexx as below using
> netview bu
Need your zPDT users advice. We want to move from local server to Amazon
hosting. if I recall correctly, at list Scott Ford once said they do. I
know that the licensing server will still stay here. no problems with that.
any pros & cons?
ITschak
--
ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform*
> On May 12, 2018, at 7:31 PM, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>> SNIP---
> Ironically, it already exists in z/OS: /bin/patch, but people are loath to
> use it --
> perhaps they ass
"SEND ''FD FILE HAS BEEN RECEIVED' USER(USR54) NOW'"
in this, " started with SEND and then two single quote start with FD and
then one closed after received and then one single and one double quote
ended after NOW.
Can you please help to correct this .
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 9:17 PM, Chris Ho
Well I see 3 double quotes and 2 single quotes .
Chris Hoelscher
Technology Architect, Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
Humana Inc.
123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Humana.com
(502) 476-2538 or 407-7266
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Disc
Hello Mike,
I dont have uneven number ob " and ' . If you notice
"SEND ''FD FILE HAS BEEN RECEIVED' USER(USR54) NOW'"
I also tried
SEND 'FD FILE HAS BEEN RECEIVED' USER(USR54) NOW
but all the time i get error
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Mike Beer wrote:
> Hi,
> You have an uneven n
Hi,
You have an uneven number of " and ' in your command.
" or ' have to be in pairs. They can be nested, if necessary.
Best regards
Mike
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Im Auftrag von
venkat kulkarni
Gesendet: 13 May, 2018 19:07
An: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Hello Lucas,
Your solution worked for me
"SUBMIT 'USR1.REXX.CNTL(REXXJCL)'" .
Now, I am trying to issue tso send command using this rexx as below using
netview but i am getting below errror
/* REXX */
ADDRESS TSO
SAY 'HELLO WORLD!'
"SEND ''FD FILE HAS BEEN RECEIVED' USER(USR54) NOW
28 matches
Mail list logo