Re: [EXTERNAL] Restore dataset with a different prefix

RENAMEU allows you to either swap the HLQ or specify the full alternative name. If I remember right, there is some rule about your replacement string being the same length as the original string, when you are trying to replace more than 1 qualifier with one or more qualifiers.. – Vignesh

Re: Restore dataset with a different prefix

RENAMEU will let you change the HLQ but will not let you change the number of qualifiers in the DSN. However, if you have a small number of HLQs to deal with, you could restore to a set of relate HLQs. For example, RENAMEU=((SYS1.**, ZSYS1.**),(TCPIP.**,ZTCPIP.**),...) Then you can list all

Re: Strange issue with SDSF main panel

Tom Conley wrote: >I've had a very hard time enabling the new commands in SDSF. Indeed. Catch-all profiles in WARNING in a sandbox help a lot. >Issue the TRACE ON;TRACE 80 command, then your failing APF command, then TRACE >OFF. Do a DA OJOB, and a ? in front of the user's TSO session, and

Re: Strange issue with SDSF main panel

On 1/29/2019 12:27 AM, Barbara Nitz wrote: I have a strange issue with the ISPF main (first) panel. I have added permission to view the APF list: pe ISFCMD.ODSP.APF.* cl(sdsf) id(grpname) ac(r) and I have refreshed the raclisted sdsf class. I expected the APF command to show up in the ISPF

Re: Using IPCS ACTIVE and alt ASID to display extended private storage

Is it possible that the storage you expect to find was freed due to the abend? The SVCDUMP would be a real time trap, while using IPCS ACTIVE is somewhat later. At any rate, try displaying X'5000' in the target address space and see what it shows you. If it skips all the way to CSA, that would

Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV [EXTERNAL]

We have a home written utility that does this. We are looking at replacing this by standard features and besides SCHENVs, the SCHEDULE parameter WITH is a good new candidate. How do you add a SCHENV to a job? Does the user/submittor do this or is it done automatically? Kees. >

D U,,ALLOC GIVES MSGIEE106I *UNKNOWN (UNKNOWN) MVS DISPLAY ALLOCATED UNITS COMMAND

In response to a D U,,ALLOC command, msgIEE106I is issued indicating a jobname of *UNKNOWN for certain DASD units. It is also not possible to Vary the unit(s) offline (unable to vary). This problem was traced to an OEM product changing the UCB in a job's TIOT without incrementing the new

Re: Using IPCS ACTIVE and alt ASID to display extended private storage

> > IPCS ACTIVE will work with other address spaces and system key fetch > > protected storage if the user of IPCS has been granted access to the > > facility classes. > > How does it behave if the target address space is swapped out? (Could > this be the problem the OP is now experiencing

Re: Internal Coupling Channel on z13

Hi Brian. Are you referring to Coupling Facility Thin Interrupts? It sounds like you might be. Also, are you running a dedicated ICF engine? Or sharing? Thanks, Martin Sent from my iPad > On 29 Jan 2019, at 06:24, Brian Westerman wrote: > > Hi, > > Has anyone had any experience with using

Internal Coupling Channel on z13

Hi, Has anyone had any experience with using the internal coupling channels on a z13. "supposedly" IBM has removed the active wait problems (where the CF lpar would try to use 100% of whatever it gets from PR/SM), but I was wondering if it's ready for prime time yet. I have a z13s (single

Strange issue with SDSF main panel

I have a strange issue with the ISPF main (first) panel. I have added permission to view the APF list: pe ISFCMD.ODSP.APF.* cl(sdsf) id(grpname) ac(r) and I have refreshed the raclisted sdsf class. I expected the APF command to show up in the ISPF main panel once I call ISPF. It does NOT show

Re: IARV64 - why ABEND rather than return with reason code?

On 29/01/2019 5:02 am, Charles Mills wrote: Also, note that while C++ appears very similar to C and is 99.9% a proper superset of C, it is a very different language conceptually, at least if used properly. I am not advocating for C (which IMHO offers few design advantages over the structured

Restore dataset with a different prefix

Hi Cross posted. Can we back up an entire volume to a virtual tape and restore all the dataset in a different volume with new prefix to all the restored dataset. For example : TCPIP.SEZALOAD as TSO1.TCPIP.SEZALOAD One way I know is to do renameunconditional and restore it, but since I have a

Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV [EXTERNAL]

We use SCHENV to direct jobs to different lpars related to MQ, DB2, IMS, SAS, Connect Direct and other miscellaneous resources. Thanks.. Paul Feller AGT Mainframe Technical Support -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of

Re: SYSAFF and SCHENV

SCHENV is 20 years old. I'm curious how many other shops have taken the plunge. . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW robin...@sce.com -Original Message- From:

Re: Using IPCS ACTIVE and alt ASID to display extended private storage

On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 13:35, Jim Mulder wrote: > > IPCS ACTIVE will work with other address spaces and system key fetch > protected storage if the user of IPCS has been granted access to the > facility classes. How does it behave if the target address space is swapped out? (Could this be the

Re: Using IPCS ACTIVE and alt ASID to display extended private storage

Thanks for the tip on the FACILITY profiles for BLSACTV.SYSTEM and BLSACTV.ADDRSPAC. Adding them and giving myself access to them did change the results. But it still appears I cannot display any storage allocated to the program I'm debugging in the other address space. For example, if

Re: IARV64 - why ABEND rather than return with reason code?

Ah! That clarifies your "debug it yourself." I was wondering what language I could write in where I would NOT have to debug it myself. I'm not *asking* for a "simple FREEMAIN"; just pointing out what my blue sky preference OS-design would be. It would be easy enough for a developer to front-end

Re: IARV64 - why ABEND rather than return with reason code?

Back in the 80's RAND was giving away PL/S on 3420's at the SF SHARE. I got one and was headed back to the office to play and my pager went off 911-Now. Turns out they had put the IBM Copyrighted Docs on the tape too. So I jumped back on the Muni with head hung low. In a message dated

Re: IARV64 - why ABEND rather than return with reason code?

Here - Here ! Never has a truer word been spoken Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Jim Mulder" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 1:36:00 PM Subject: Re: IARV64 - why ABEND rather than return with reason code? I agree with all of that. But

Re: IARV64 - why ABEND rather than return with reason code?

I agree with all of that. But that is an area of IBM where I have no influence. When you work for a large company, you either learn to live with things like that, or you spend a lot of your time being very frustrated. Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.

Re: IARV64 - why ABEND rather than return with reason code?

Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie NY > > That's why I have been heard to say in IBM, "If you wrote it in C, you > must have wanted to debug the problems yourself". > > I guess it depends on your point of view. I would say that if you wrote it > in

Re: IZUSVR1 failed after new PTFs applied

Does HOMETEST report any errors? (just thinking out loud...) Dana On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 02:01:55 +0100, R.S. wrote: >To complement myself: >IZUSVR1 is zOSMF. > >java.net.UnknownHostException seems to be popular error in Websphere and >it most likely can occur because of TCPIP poor

Re: Using IPCS ACTIVE and alt ASID to display extended private storage

Good to know; must have been a lot of work. Thanks. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Jim Mulder Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 1:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re:

Re: IZUSVR1 failed after new PTFs applied

LRECL=80 RECFM=3120 DSORG=PS. So, 80 FB Matt Hogstrom m...@hogstrom.org +1-919-656-0564 PGP Key: 0x90ECB270 Facebook LinkedIn Twitter From Lord of the Rings, when Frodo decides to

Re: Using IPCS ACTIVE and alt ASID to display extended private storage

IPCS ACTIVE will work with other address spaces and system key fetch protected storage if the user of IPCS has been granted access to the facility classes. I did a considerable amount of work in z/OS 2.3 to improve the performance of IPCS ACTIVE's handling of unallocated storage ranges. I

Re: Using IPCS ACTIVE and alt ASID to display extended private storage

I think that the only tool that will let you do that is zXDC. I have used IPCS “Active” but only to work on a system problem involving common storage (not specifically CSA). But there I was effectively in read only mode. Sent from my iPhone — small keyboarf, fat fungrs, stupd spell manglr.

Re: IARV64 - why ABEND rather than return with reason code?

On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 23:47, Jim Mulder wrote: > It is unfortunate that IBM does not make PL/X (which > has object-oriented capabilities) available > to ISVs. I have often wondered why the large ISVs did > not have their executives constantly hammering IBM > executives over this issue. Of

Re: IZUSVR1 failed after new PTFs applied

I try this way, but few questions come to my mind: 1. Is it regular PS FB 80 dataset? 2. Should I make some customizations of IZUSVR1 to point to this dataset name, or it will be taken just by default? Note: I created PS FB 80 with proper content but it didn't help. I also had no evidence the

Re: Using IPCS ACTIVE and alt ASID to display extended private storage

On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:06:48 -0600 Wendell Lovewell <01e9c0ee0673-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: :>I'm trying to debug TSO process on USERA by using IPCS from USERB by specifying ACTIVE and ASID(x'USERA's asid'). :>An address I need to display is in USERA's extended private area, but

Re: Using IPCS ACTIVE and alt ASID to display extended private storage

I don't know of one, and I see significant issues in implementing it. You might try an RFE, I doubt that IBM will do it. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Wendell Lovewell

Using IPCS ACTIVE and alt ASID to display extended private storage

I'm trying to debug TSO process on USERA by using IPCS from USERB by specifying ACTIVE and ASID(x'USERA's asid'). An address I need to display is in USERA's extended private area, but LOC is only working up to the top of the extended CSA. LOC for any extended private address results in

Re: Ca7 auto-ticketing with ServiceNow tool

Rajesh, I would recommend you go to the CA 7 Community page on the CA Communities site and ask there. https://communities.ca.com/ Better chance of getting product-specific questions from the community of users of that specific product. Russell Witt CA 1 Development -Original

Re: CICS IR I/O wait time (inter-region (MRO) I/O wait)

To begin with - You need to read the following publications for You specific release of CICS CICS/TS Intersystem Communication Guide CICS/TS Performance Guide CICS/TS Problem Determination Guide (IRC WAIT) . You don't state weather the Partner Region is a File Owning region (FOR) or another

Re: IARV64 - why ABEND rather than return with reason code?

> That's why I have been heard to say in IBM, "If you wrote it in C, you must have wanted to debug the problems yourself". I guess it depends on your point of view. I would say that if you wrote it in HLASM you must have wanted to be able to debug it yourself. > It is unfortunate that IBM does

Re: IARV64 - why ABEND rather than return with reason code?

> o No facility to increment a pointer. template static inline T *PointerAdd(const T *ptr, const int increment) { return (T *)( reinterpret_cast(ptr)+increment ); } Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On

Re: Goodbye, thanks, and take care!

Peter, Your contributions will be missed! As someone who once worked outside the US and now works early hours on the East Coast, I always appreciated our contributors from Europe, the Middle East and Asia. Your gain is our loss. As someone else already stated, drop by every now and again. Even

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: how many OSes run on IBMz

I remember having maintain a PICK system w back https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pick_operating_system On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 09:20, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh < vignesh.v.sankaranaraya...@marks-and-spencer.com> wrote: > Hi Arthur, > > Thank you, always open to history lessons  > Didn't

Re: IARV64 - why ABEND rather than return with reason code?

Hi Jim, You said: "... It is unfortunate that IBM does not make PL/X (which has object-oriented capabilities) available to ISVs. ..." It is also unfortunate that PL/X was not made available to customers, just like there is no free z/OS (and z/VM, z/VSE) Download for students and other

Re: Goodbye, thanks, and take care!

Peter Hunkeler wrote: >I will retire by the end of the month. You may not! ;-) You must enjoy your well deserved retirement. >Thank you so much for all the help, and for all the bearing with me. I learnt >a hell lot just by following this and other fora. Quite often I was able to >solve

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: how many OSes run on IBMz

Hi Arthur, Thank you, always open to history lessons  Didn't mean to attempt to give an actual explanation as such.. was just thinking of it in a comical sense, that's all. – Vignesh Mainframe Infrastructure -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Arthur

Re: CICS IR I/O wait time (inter-region (MRO) I/O wait)

Thanks Joe  Unfortunately we don't have CICS Performance Analyzer on this Lpar. On Monday, January 28, 2019, 12:33:26 PM GMT+3:30, Joe Monk wrote: Do you have CICS Performance Analyzer? If so, a cross system work report will answer this question. Joe On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 2:48 AM

Re: CICS IR I/O wait time (inter-region (MRO) I/O wait)

Do you have CICS Performance Analyzer? If so, a cross system work report will answer this question. Joe On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 2:48 AM Mehrshad Manshadi < 0056e0e17177-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Hi, > The IRIOWTT(Interregion I/O wait time) time is very high(14 min). > Would

CICS IR I/O wait time (inter-region (MRO) I/O wait)

Hi, The IRIOWTT(Interregion I/O wait time) time is very high(14 min). Would you please help me to know the cause and which parameter i should control to prevent this issue?  -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: Goodbye, thanks, and take care!

Dang Peter.. I enjoy reading your posts.. Best wishes for the future, and come back occasionally as a “civilian” if you can! Regards, Graeme Graeme Gibson > On 28 Jan 2019, at 18:04, Jake Anderson wrote: > > Peter > > Many times you have helped. > > Best wishes and enjoy your retirement >