Having explored the topic in the past, I believe you need to talk to IBM. The
platform and code for the HMC and SE systems is under tight control and nobody
but IBM can provide you with access to the thing. IBM customers are not allowed
to do that. And event if/when you get the thing, it will
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 09:29, R.S. wrote:
>
> IMHO the topic is HMC for zPDT. Unfortunately zPDT does not have HMC in
> any form, real or emulated.
> It's not mainframe, it's only emulation.
No, zPDT *is* a mainframe. It implements a permitted subset of the
architecture documented in the
I hate to be defending some anonymous old fogey, but his message is intended to
endorse regular and rigorous maintenance, not to criticize it.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132
W dniu 2019-02-01 o 19:50, Tom Conley pisze:
On 2/1/2019 12:22 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
I'd like to explore this teaser post. I was (I think also) dubious
about the original comment in that it seems to disparage--or at least
discourage--mass service like RSU, which I view as a major advance
At first I thought maybe the referent was me. Wise? Debatable. Older? Remotely
possible. But I searched my closet in vain for a 'denim newsie'. I guess that
could signify my road apple hat.
Anyway those who've heard me say 'always broke' know that I mean nothing
derogatory. Quite the
As I mentioned previously, we devised a set of JES2 exit routines that process
JECL cards (/*SCHENV ...) to create the required 16 byte SCHENV card. The user
can code that directly if desired; otherwise we build it from JECL.
The only value we insert directly on the user's behalf is 'TAPE'. 20
On 2/1/2019 12:22 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
I'd like to explore this teaser post. I was (I think also) dubious about the original
comment in that it seems to disparage--or at least discourage--mass service like RSU,
which I view as a major advance in software maintenance. Is there really
I'd like to explore this teaser post. I was (I think also) dubious about the
original comment in that it seems to disparage--or at least discourage--mass
service like RSU, which I view as a major advance in software maintenance. Is
there really wide-spread distrust of an "unavoidable 'push'"?
I confess that my advice was based on (geologically) ancient experience. I
don't remember what macro I was using, but I truly hit the problem I alluded
to. Illustrates the down-side of 'experience'. The longer you've done
something, the less likely you are to haul out the manual (physically or
Hello, IBM mainframers!
I am currently working with some folks who are building a new IBM System/360
simulator using SIMH for historical software preservation purposes. The plan
includes supporting the unique features of the model 67.
We are looking for machine readable copies of IBM's
No. The ussue ia clearly HMC. I just explained why we do not have one
(zPDT) and why we need one (develpment of automatic STIG assussment of
HMC).
I don't need my own one. It can be other people hmc (and no need to be
connected to a real mainframe. Autonatic Assessment of mainframes we
already
IMHO the topic is HMC for zPDT. Unfortunately zPDT does not have HMC in
any form, real or emulated.
It's not mainframe, it's only emulation.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 2019-02-01 o 13:10, ITschak Mugzach pisze:
But you need an HMC to connect to... Ir install an agent. Bcpii
Thanks all.
> Charles fell
> into the subtle case that specifying PLISTVER=MAX in effect is saying "I
> am using new function".
I plead guilty. I fell into the trap of reading
> If you can tolerate the size change, IBM recommends that you always
> specify PLISTVER=MAX on the list form of the
The Syntax for ICKDSF is:
FLASHCPY WITHDRAW UNIT(CCUU) TARGETVOL(LSS,CCA,CCUU)
Example:
FLASHCPY WITHDRAW UNIT(5C06) -
TARGETVOL(X'01', X'07',5C87)
Joe
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 8:26 AM esmie moo <
012780d99c7b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I noticed that the jcl was
How do you want to do that?
1) Is the SYSOUT still on the JES2 Spool?
2) Has the SYSOUT been purged from the JES2 Spool?
3) Do you need an automated process?
4) Do you need a manual process?
5) What level of z/OS are you running?
You can
1) Purchase a sysout management product -
On 1/31/2019 6:51 PM, Shaffer, Terri wrote:
I have to say, I've never seen this before so.
BROWSE ,ISPCFIGU:18772000:0F98 ,Line,0132,Col,001 080
Command ===>,,Scroll ===>,CSR
-10 (18771FF0) *
As a general rule for LIST/EXECUTE form macros, avoid coding anything else
on the execute call except for E. The reason is that the LIST call
determines what data needs to be included in the generated code
Not for macros written in the base control program (and elsewhere) in the
past 30
Disagree.
Obviously place as much as possible in the LIST form, but if it is not
repeated that much you can use COMPLETE without worries.
Using PLISTVER=MAX on the MF=E declares that the running system is at least
the level of the system that compiled. Never a good idea for a vendor. Use the
I noticed that the jcl was misaligned. I don't know why. I will try to fix
the problem.
/* //STEP1 EXEC
PGM=ICKDSF,REGION=4M //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //SYSIN
DD * FLASHCPY WITHDRAW SDEVN(816B)
I thought it uses TGTVOL and SRCVOL, not SEDVN/TDEVN, but I could be wrong.
;-D an
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
esmie moo
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2019 7:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ICKDSF QUESTION
Gentle Readers,
I am trying to
Gentle Readers,
I am trying to terminate the relationship between the source and target adress
of FLASHCOPY which was initiated by FDRFLASH.
I am encountering the following error"ICKDSF - MVS/ESA DEVICE SUPPORT
FACILITIES
But you need an HMC to connect to... Ir install an agent. Bcpii is limited,
rest api is poßible, but still need an hmc
בתאריך יום ו׳, 1 בפבר׳ 2019, 13:09, מאת Mike Schwab :
> I think they do a remote control of the HMC from another PC.
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 4:11 AM ITschak Mugzach wrote:
>
I think they do a remote control of the HMC from another PC.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 4:11 AM ITschak Mugzach wrote:
>
> I know, but there is a virtual appliance for rs6000. I need a hmc to
> develop an agent for our stig compliance automation product IronSphere, but
> zpdt (our mainframe) doean't
W dniu 2019-02-01 o 10:27, ITschak Mugzach pisze:
Thimoty,
I need the hmc itself, not the interface / web app.
What do you need?
Do you have mainframe without HMC?
AFAIK it is possible only when mainframe bought from second hand,
because IBM always deliver HMC.
However in that case you can
I know, but there is a virtual appliance for rs6000. I need a hmc to
develop an agent for our stig compliance automation product IronSphere, but
zpdt (our mainframe) doean't have or support this facility.
ITschak
בתאריך יום ו׳, 1 בפבר׳ 2019, 12:01, מאת R.S. :
> W dniu 2019-01-31 o 17:02,
W dniu 2019-01-31 o 17:02, ITschak Mugzach pisze:
I know power systems has one. Dies system z has such product?
No.
Both HMC and SE are physical machines. PC vel x64.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
==
Jeśli nie jesteś
Ron,
If they are in the output queue, then they probably haven't been printed.
Do you want to keep a copy on the output queue?
If not, just change the class and destination to one that a printer processes.
If you want the output copy left, you could do something like XDC it to a flat
file,
I like tape too, especially since we introduced a VTS its connections were
initially 'faster' than disk, which could only catch up with new disk systems.
After the tape-to-disk migrations of decades ago, I started disk-to-tape
migrations again to gain disk space. Sadly there were not many
Thimoty,
I need the hmc itself, not the interface / web app.
ITschak
בתאריך יום ו׳, 1 בפבר׳ 2019, 8:01, מאת Timothy Sipples :
> >I know power systems has one. Dies system z has such product?
>
> The Hardware Management Console is available in traditional desktop and 1U
> rack mounted form
I still like tape.
No B37 abends. No waiting for recalls from HSM and reduces the need for HSM
recycling.
As long as only 1 open is required at a time and no one needs to
browse/edit the dataset, I don't see any reason to store large sequential
datasets on DASD.
CA-1 reporting and ISPF panels
30 matches
Mail list logo