Our SyzMPF/z also allows it, so I don't see why CA can't handle it as well,
after all they cost more than 10 times more.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Ron, I don't need a single record per P.O, what i need is pull 100 P.O in the
output file . A P.O will contain multiple records for e.g if each PO has 5
rows then the ouput will be 500. I put something like the below but this is not
working
SORT FIELDS=COPY
INREC
Some sandbox testing shows that IEFSSN00 *seems to be* starting all
subsystems that:
1) Contain the INITRTN() verb, and,
2) Have a proc in SYS1.PROCLIB with the same name as the SUBNAME() verb.
So, on the system containing the IEFSSN00 shown below, SMS, JES2, RACF
and IXFP are started. DFRM is
I second that.
We use SA's ProcOps functionality, and I was curious if OPS/MVS had an
equivalent.
I found OPSHMC does indeed provide similar functionality.
Maybe OPS/MVS also has similar functionality for Job Log Monitoring (which
I have not yet leveraged in our SA environment).
On Tue, May 21,
I've just published version 10.33 of PCRE2 (Perl Compatible Regular
Expressions) for z/OS.The distribution is available on file939 of the
CBTTAPE.org (currently, in the 'UPDATE' page)
http://cbttape.org/ftp/updates/CBT939.zip and eventually will move to the main
page
Sigh...
This reminded me of a "recent" topic that touched on early address space
creation.
I found it in my inbox with the title "How is CAMASTER started?"
Very interesting, with mentions of IKJEFXSR and ICHALTSP.
I sigh because that topic was from June 18th, 2015! I could have sworn it
was only a
Ron,
I read your OP that you wanted a single record per PO. As your sample shows
each PO as a duplicate, SUM FIELDS=NONE would give you just one record per PO,
and you can use INCLUDE to filter that to any 100 records you want.
Based on my reading of the requirement SUM FIELDS=NONE would work.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 4:14 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: problem with FTP from Windows 10 to z/OS
>
> On Tue, 21 May 2019 17:40:13 -0500, Kevin Merkley wrote:
> >
> >In the
Do you need to pull 100 specified numbers, 100 random numbers, or the first 100
numbers?
If the first 100: Sort on key with EQUALS specified. Add a sequence number to
the output record and use the WHEN=GROUP function to increment the sequence
number only when the key changes. Stop when the
Thanks! That helps explain an IPL last year of a newly-created LPAR
where we removed every startup parm we could think of for the first IPL.
ACF2 messages still showed up on the console, so I figured there must be
a hook somewhere. We had copied the res-pack from an already running
system.
On Tue, 21 May 2019 17:40:13 -0500, Kevin Merkley wrote:
>
>In the instructions for customers, I added a part on how to use the script,
>especially for those that are doing the FTP from Windows 10. It actually seems
>to be a "cleaner", more user-friendly way for them to perform this task.
>
Ron . what i need is copy 100 PO numbers details to a new file . One P.O has
multiple rows . I don't think that will work
Thanks
Ron T
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
As someone noted, the RACF STC was originally optional. That's not RACF Lord
and Protector but RACF the Operator Command Utility. SMPE-managed
[SYS1.IBM.]PROCLIB now supplies this element in z/OS 2.3:
//**//
//* RACF:
Sort it first with the SUM FIELDS=NONE option.
RON HAWKINS
Director, Ipsicsopt Pty Ltd (ACN: 627 705 971)
m+61 400029610| t: +1 4085625415 | f: +1 4087912585
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ron
Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, 22 May 2019 08:26
To:
I realized that I never posted my solution.
I ended up writing a Windows PowerShell script. It does some verification of
data in a file that contains upload information such as destination IP address
and userid, etc. Then it displays a window prompting for any required items not
specified in
Hi .
i have FB file with lrecl 5000 and here below is layout. key is first 11 bytes
PO number
102016| 31859949 || 1613QTTR| 1
102016| 31859949 || 1613QTTR| 1
102016| 31859949 || 1613QTTR| 1
102016
I have done various searches and have not found anything that helps.
The problem happens in IPCS dialog mode in Option 1 - Browse.
I want to use a REXX exec (I call it SYSBXCBX) to format control blocks.
SYSBXCBX is in a PDSE in the concatenation of DDname SYSEXEC. I have tested
with interpreted
As with the auth/unauth case, ISPF does not allow the subtasks for different
splits to be ready concurrently. I've used WSA to get around that, but, alas,
IBM is killing it off.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM
You're missing the point; the TMP does not allow two command subtasks to be
ready concurrently. That's very different from how applications normally manage
their subtasks. TSO's rules about authorized and unauthorized commands are
clearly relevant because one of those rules ensures that there
There is a queue for each task, but more than one task can issue STAX. The exit
for a subtask get control before the exit for the parent task.
Are you thinking of CLSTATTN (sp?) and TOPLEVEL?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
On Tue, 21 May 2019 10:27:20 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>I am looking at my ipl process and am trying to understand why some of
>the start by themselves.
>
>I am in a sandbox so I can play all I want.
>
>My current IEFSSN00 is:
>01 SUBSYS SUBNAME(SMS)
>02INITRTN(IGDSSIIN)
>03
What happens if you hit enter after the READY prompt?
Was the keyboard unlocked when you hit PA1?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mike Stramba
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 2:11
After it goes back to TSO READY, what happens if you enter 'TEST'.
Does it go into TEST mode, and if so, what happens if you then enter the 'RUN'
subcommand of TEST?
Does the program resume from where it was interrupted?
Bill
On Tue, 21 May 2019 14:11:09 -0400, Mike Stramba wrote:
>Also tried
hit send before I was done :(
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.icha200/racfss.htm
+
IEFSSN00
SUBSYS SUBNAME(RACF) /* RACF */
INITRTN(IRRSSI00) /* COMMAND PREFIX '@' */
INITPARM('@') /* */
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
there are specific steps to take if you are a RACF shop to initialize RACF
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.icha200/racfss.htm
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Gibney"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday,
I don't think anyone has mentioned IEACMDxx as another source of Starts, etc.
IBM discourages user modification, probably part of why COMMDSxx exists.
And, not this isn't where the RACF address space is started.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of
Charles Mills wrote:
> @Phil has suggested a different e-mail client but I am hoping to make a
> smaller change than that.
FTR, I didn't make that suggestion as "You should do this"; I meant it as "If
you can't find a real solution, I suppose that would solve it". So yeah, a
smaller change
The RACF subsystem gets started out if ICHSEC00, which is invoked out of IPL.
If I recall correctly, both ACF2 and Top Secret provide a replacement for
ICHSEC00 (probably the same code for both products).
Wayne Driscoll
Rocket Software
Note - All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original
On Tue, 21 May 2019 at 12:11, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
> One of the questions I am trying to answer is "who is starting RACF
> during IPL". It's not in COMMNDxx.
>
Just in passing (and I realize this isn't what you're asking, but is maybe
a terminology/concepts issue), the RACF subsystem is not
Maybe check with CA then. Ya never know.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, May 21, 2019 1:11 PM, John McKown
wrote:
> On Tue,
Yes I did mean at the READY prompt.
I think that STAX acts at the TCB level. The CLIST will be running on different
TCB from any program that it invokes, as each command is invoked using an
ATTACH macro. I have seen situations where the CLIST flushes the stack after
the interrupt and so the
Also tried these variants :
CALL 'MYLOGIN.LOAD(PLINT)' 'TRAP(ON)/123456789012'
CALL 'MYLOGIN.LOAD(PLITSO)' 'TRAP(ON)/123456789012'
CALL 'MYLOGIN.LOAD(PLIMVS)' 'TRAP(ON)/123456789012'
Same results ( ATTENTION kills program back to TSO READY, PA1 no effect)
Mike
On 5/21/19, Mike Stramba
Ok I have tried running the program from the TSO ready prompt.
CALL (LOAD(PLIxxx)
I have compiled three versions :
Enterprise PL/I for z/OS V5.R2.M4 (Built:20190424)
z/OS 02.03.00
1) SYSTEM(TSO) option(+ INTERRUPT
2) SYSTEM(MVS)option (+ INTERRUPT
3) no "SYSTEM(XXX)
So no matter if you have RACF,TSS,ACF2 - RACF is always started - similar to
early code for DB2.
Then once the system gets up far enough, you can start RACF,TSS,ACF2
So what are you seeing where you have a question about "who is starting RACF"
So two separate phases for RACF.
And yes, I did
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:02 PM Cieri, Anthony wrote:
>
> This won't help unless you are running IBM System Automation (SA).
> I believe that IBM SA can be configured to "trap" messages written to
> JESSYSMSG.
>
Thanks. We don't run that. We run CA-OPS/MVS. We are heavy into CA
This won't help unless you are running IBM System Automation (SA). I
believe that IBM SA can be configured to "trap" messages written to JESSYSMSG.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Tuesday,
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:11 AM Tony Thigpen wrote:
> Thanks. That helped a lot.
>
> One of the questions I am trying to answer is "who is starting RACF
> during IPL". It's not in COMMNDxx.
>
I looked back in my SYSLOG information from our last IPL. I saw the
following:
19069 15:58:24.57
On 2019-05-21 12:14, Charles Mills wrote:
@Phil has suggested a different e-mail client but I am hoping to make a smaller
change than that.
I'm with Phil on this. Personally, I use and like
https://www.typeapp.com/ . If you're like me and need to check several
email accounts, it's dead easy
By "native TSO" do you mean the READY prompt?
The CLIST processor uses STAX; the override rules are the same as for any other
user of STAX.
REXX doesn't support attention handling code, but the REXX interpreter does do
a STAX and writes a prompt for attention.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Not a mainframe question but a mainframe LIST question.
Whenever I reply to an IBMMAIN thread with my Samsung Android mail client
(phone or tablet) the lines of both my reply and the quoted post all run
together as shown below.
It does not happen when I reply to any other kind of e-mail (that
Thanks. That helped a lot.
One of the questions I am trying to answer is "who is starting RACF
during IPL". It's not in COMMNDxx.
Tony Thigpen
John McKown wrote on 5/21/19 10:56 AM:
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 9:47 AM John McKown
wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 9:27 AM Tony Thigpen wrote:
You may get different results when running the program in a CLIST as opposed to
running it from native TSO. I don't know what other mysteries REXX brings to
the table.
CLIST processing has ATTN handling, which (from memory) overrides the use of
STAX (assembler TSO interrupt handling macro)
When you provision a zCX instance, you need to specify the configuration
details. One of these is the IP address that will be assigned to the
Linux guest. When the guest starts up, by default it will listen on a
network port for ssh connections. You can then use your favorite ssh
client to
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 9:47 AM John McKown
wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 9:27 AM Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
>> I am looking at my ipl process and am trying to understand why some of
>> the start by themselves.
>>
>> I am in a sandbox so I can play all I want.
>>
>> My current IEFSSN00 is:
>>
Let me step back a bit.
zCX is essentially a hypervisor, which runs Linux as a guest operating
system. That guest is running Docker as a process, and exposes it to
the network. You can instruct Docker to run s390x container(s) of your
choosing. They will be run in the context of the Linux
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 9:27 AM Tony Thigpen wrote:
> I am looking at my ipl process and am trying to understand why some of
> the start by themselves.
>
> I am in a sandbox so I can play all I want.
>
> My current IEFSSN00 is:
> 01 SUBSYS SUBNAME(SMS)
> 02INITRTN(IGDSSIIN)
> 03
>From the IBM page:
https://www.ibm.com/support/z-content-solutions/container-extensions/
look at the video and see that it works just like any other Linux box,
i.e. docker exec -it /bin/bash
I don't think the network stuff is going to work any different than z/Linux
running under VM or LPAR.
I am looking at my ipl process and am trying to understand why some of
the start by themselves.
I am in a sandbox so I can play all I want.
My current IEFSSN00 is:
01 SUBSYS SUBNAME(SMS)
02INITRTN(IGDSSIIN)
03INITPARM('ID=00,PROMPT=DISPLAY')
04 SUBSYS SUBNAME(JES2) /*
Maybe I missed something:
Does it mean, the docker container *under z/OS* may contain some zLinux
workload?
Linux (in container) under z/OS?
If yes - can it be offloaded to IFL or it has to run on CP/zIIP/zAAP?
Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
This question was sparked by the thread on tracking PROC usage. I don't see
any way to "trap" messages written to JESYSMSG. I know that I can process
them using the SAPI,
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieaf200/sapi.htm,
or the SDSF API or a number of
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 7:04 PM Lizette Koehler
wrote:
> Is this possible?
>
> If so, what SMF record can I use to find the following
>
> JOBNAME/PROC Used/Date/Time/LPAR
>
>
> Note: No SAS /no MXG
>
> Only IFASMFDP or DAF
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Lizette
>
>
I think this has been asked before and
On 5/21/19, Joe Monk wrote:
> With the INTERRUPT option and TRAP(ON), the compiler should generate a STAX
> macro for TSO/E attention processing.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Adding 'TRAP(ON)' to the PARM for IBMZPLI throws a "not recognized option error"
Instead, running the program with CALL
On Tue, 21 May 2019, at 12:56, Clark Morris wrote:
> [Default] On 21 May 2019 02:05:02 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> bdis...@dissensoftware.com (Binyamin Dissen) wrote:
>
> >How would you use this information? All it does is give instructions on how
> >to
> >run programs.
>
> While I can't
[Default] On 21 May 2019 02:05:02 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
bdis...@dissensoftware.com (Binyamin Dissen) wrote:
>How would you use this information? All it does is give instructions on how to
>run programs.
While I can't speak for the original poster, I used the information to
help
To be more specific - how can I connect via SSH to a docker container
running under zCX?
Also, how does networking work? If I provision a zCX container running
an nginx web server it still uses the host network stack so won't be able
to take advantage of Linux APIs like epoll etc. I guess the
Dumb question: How to we shell into a docker container running on z/OS?
On 21/05/2019 6:25 pm, Anthony Giorgio wrote:
If you would like to build your own s390x Docker container, the
recommended paths are to either use a zCX instance on z/OS, or a Linux
on Z environment.
As for your specific
If you would like to build your own s390x Docker container, the
recommended paths are to either use a zCX instance on z/OS, or a Linux
on Z environment.
As for your specific question - I did some digging, and it looks like
Docker isn't really designed for cross-compiling containers.
With the INTERRUPT option and TRAP(ON), the compiler should generate a STAX
macro for TSO/E attention processing.
Joe
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 4:13 PM Mike Stramba wrote:
> No, it's not a "good call".
>
> I do have the INTERRUPT option enabled.
>
> At least that's what the compiler listing
Mike,
Maybe a dumb question, but do you have TRAP(ON) set in your runtime options?
Joe
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 4:13 PM Mike Stramba wrote:
> No, it's not a "good call".
>
> I do have the INTERRUPT option enabled.
>
> At least that's what the compiler listing says.
>
> What code does the
How would you use this information? All it does is give instructions on how to
run programs.
You would also need to know the library the proc came from And PROC's change.
On Mon, 20 May 2019 17:04:24 -0700 Lizette Koehler
wrote:
:>Is this possible?
:>If so, what SMF record can I use to
60 matches
Mail list logo
