[Default] On 7 Jun 2019 09:26:29 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote:
>How many vulnerabilities have you seen that did not come down to people? Those
>sysprogs are just the tip of the iceberg as far as configuration, enforcement,
>management, policy, procedure,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 11:34, Glenn Wilcock wrote:
> The DFSMS team recently created a LinkedIn Group for z/OS DFSMS:
> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12238880/ Join the group to stay current
> on the latest enhancements, tips, news, etc. For example, while z/OS
> release RFAs describe all of
I got this request from a customer:
I need a keyring on the SYSX top secret database for XXID01. I have a
Certificate Authority key at XX.CER
and a personal key at XX.PFX.
This is for SMPE RECEIVE ORDER processing.
What are the steps to get this setup. I did execute a CHKCERT on
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 08:52, Mike Schwab wrote:
> Well, the hardware does move a 256 byte area aligned on a 256 bytes
> boundary very efficiently. And would allow you to load the register
> with an address without storing the last byte. So a storage pool with
> allocation of multiples of 256
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:57:37 -0400, Susan Shumway wrote:
>
>All formats of the z/OS V2R4 product documentation are now published!
>Links to everything are on the z/OS Internet Library:
>https://www.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zosInternetLibrary
>...
>Otherwise, as always, we
Sounds like another good RFE - go for it.
I think getting the current LISTDSI updated/enhanced will probably be easier
than that major enhancement but I could be wrong.
Lionel B. Dyck <
Website: http://www.lbdsoftware.com
"Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:37:26 -0500, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
>I just submitted this RFE this morning that will address this issue (if/when):
>
>https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=134932
>
>Note that there is another RFE for a LISTDSI enhancement for which the
Okay, that's good to hear! Thanks for the follow-up, gil.
-Sue Shumway
On 7/26/2019 2:16 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:17:47 -0400, Susan Shumway wrote:
Okay, please point me to such a PDF as an example if you come across
one. They should all be the same, with form numbers
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:17:47 -0400, Susan Shumway wrote:
>
>Okay, please point me to such a PDF as an example if you come across
>one. They should all be the same, with form numbers that you can copy
>and paste as text, so it would be an anomaly.
>
I may have panicked needlessly (and infected
I just submitted this RFE this morning that will address this issue (if/when):
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=134932
Note that there is another RFE for a LISTDSI enhancement for which the
developers asked for more input so that implies they may be open to
Hi gil,
I'll pass your questions on to the builder to answer.
-Sue Shumway
On 7/24/2019 5:19 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 20:18:55 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Associations? Doesn't the IBM server send file types? Doesn't Chrome support
file types, which have been in HTTP
I know that you don't like CSI, but IMHO that's the best way to go.
Postprocessing the LISTC output is easy, but will break if IBM changes the
format.
In the long run, have you considered asking IBM for a CI enhancement to allow
both generation and member in DSN, or to allow relative
Hi Kees,
Okay, please point me to such a PDF as an example if you come across
one. They should all be the same, with form numbers that you can copy
and paste as text, so it would be an anomaly.
-Sue Shumway
On 7/25/2019 2:01 AM, Vernooij, Kees - KLM , ITOP NM wrote:
Hi Sue,
I was talking
Thanks for pointing that out, Kirk. I'm passing this along to our
builders so that they can investigate. In the meantime, if you need to
point to a library PDF from anywhere, try linking to either of these
types of pages instead:
- KC landing page of the containing element, for example
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:47:13 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
>I just don't see any _simple_ way to do this. I need to convert the
>gdgbase(0) into gdgbase.GVnn absolute. Believe it or not, I have a
>product which creates a number of PDS libraries (not PDSE) which are GDG. I
>want to generate some
Take some (any) big C or COBOL program and run it through the relevant
compiler with the pseudo-assembler output option turned on, OPT and ARCH(9
or 10). Then do an ISPF FIND for the op code. No guarantees of course.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi Glenn,
outside of US is LinkedIn not so popular and common. Without account it
is not possible to read the group.
Would you please so kind to post your infos also to this discussion list
or on some IBM-webpage.
Thanks,
Alexander
-- Original Message --
From: "Glenn Wilcock"
To:
Try the following:
/* Rexx - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - */
/* determine the absolute generation of a GDG*/
/* Execute the rexx passing it the GDG Base and the relative */
/* generation number
The DFSMS team recently created a LinkedIn Group for z/OS DFSMS:
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12238880/ Join the group to stay current on
the latest enhancements, tips, news, etc. For example, while z/OS release RFAs
describe all of the major enhancements in a release, they don't include
Hello,
Thank you for your reply, I tried varying the PATH online.
But the problem was not solved.
Next time, I will try to change the IOCP (added CUADD).
Best regards,
Toyokazu Kobayashi
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Charles"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Friday,
I have REXX code that uses LISTC to find the latest fqdn but that isn't always
desired even if it is the only way.
I just created an RFE requesting LISTDSI provide support for relative GDG -
please add your vote
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=134932
> So I cannot use the "tso" Unix command...
Doh.
Never mind.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
(Another "too late" reply. That'll teach me to go on vacation.)
This script illustrates how to do it, but I'm not sure it would work early in
the IPL sequence (since it needs to run TSO commands):
#!/bin/sh
if /bin/tsocmd "listd '$1'" >/dev/null 2>/dev/null ; then
echo "$1 exists"
else
Not sure if possible, but i would give a try to jcl refer back. Step 1 use
the dd as dummy, but run a rexx to free and allocate the right ddname with
a member name received from jcl parm.
Step 2 reference the dd, but it is now a different name.
ITschak
בתאריך יום ו׳, 26 ביולי 2019, 15:50, מאת
Well, the hardware does move a 256 byte area aligned on a 256 bytes
boundary very efficiently. And would allow you to load the register
with an address without storing the last byte. So a storage pool with
allocation of multiples of 256 bytes would greatly helped.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:53
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 07:44:51 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 4:19 PM Tom Marchant <
>000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
>> How about an IEBCOPY step where you specify GDGBASE(0) on
>> INDD (or whatever) and select MEMBER to be unloaded to a
>> temporary
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 4:19 PM Tom Marchant <
000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:47:13 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
> >I just don't see any _simple_ way to do this. I need to convert the
> >gdgbase(0) into gdgbase.GVnn absolute. Believe it or not,
> I request your help to merge all cert-related record types from
> IRRDBU00 (hopefully just the ones listed here - 0207, 0500, 0560,
> 0561, 0562, 1560), and dedupe it based on the unique cert "name" field.
> Once done, I need help printing out all the other fields mentioned
> above so as to get
Hello All,
This is more of a SORT question than RACF or certs, so posting here.
Below is the 'CERTEXP' JCL member in RACFICE2 that shows all certs that are
expiring in the next 'n' days.
//USER01I JOB MSGLEVEL=(1,1),NOTIFY=,CLASS=A,
// MSGCLASS=H,REGION=19M
//*
//RACFICE EXEC
Thanks Mark, I will give it a try.
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, 21:37 Mark Charles, wrote:
> I just set up z/OSMF and remember the answer to this: MEMLIMIT parameter
> needs to actually work. This can be controlled by SMFPRMxx and/or SMF
> exits. You probably won't get any messages from SMF when SMF
30 matches
Mail list logo
