On 2019-10-05 5:24 AM, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
SMF will give the close time but I've found nothing that will give me the open
time.
Well, SMF14OPE tells you something...
Cheers,
Greg
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
SSI will not do it.
SMF 14/15 is indeed CLOSE time only.
SMF 62 will give you the OPEN for a VSAM dataset.
SMF 92/10 will give you the OPEN for a UNIX file.
You could consider RACF auditing and SMF 80 (230 for ACF2).
(All of the "SMF" answers assume the use IEFU8x exits.)
Charles
David Jousma wrote:
>Does every JES3 shop that wants to remain have to re-buy (I'm guessing yes)?
>Otherwise how's the money going to be made?
Presumably they'll be charging for maintenance and support.
--
For IBM-MAIN
Have you looked at, e.g., IFG0EX0B ?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Lionel B Dyck
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2019 3:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SSI
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 17:31:06 +, Jousma, David wrote:
>Does every JES3 shop that wants to remain have to re-buy (I'm guessing yes)?
>Otherwise how's the money going to be made?
Buy? Is a one-time charge an option these days?
--
Tom Marchant
Thank you but subsystem datasets are not what I was looking for - my goal is to
capture the date/time a data set is opened and the date/time a data set is
closed. SMF will give the close time but I've found nothing that will give me
the open time.
Lionel B. Dyck <
Website:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 07:11:21 +, Martin Packer
wrote:
>
>Interesting. And no I didn’t know about it. Question: At what stage does
>the ESQA into ECSA check wave a red (or orange) flag?
>
>Cheers, Martin
From monitors it depends I guess. But the OS does it right away via
IRA103I SQA/ESQA
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 07:55, Jerry Callen wrote:
>
> See: https://github.com/CBTTape/290
> It contains an implementation of subsystem datasets.
As does CBT 364.
The two of them (290 has very useful doc) along with the current JES2
source will give you enough information to write your own simple
Didn't mean to create confusion with the below statement.
I should have said, "We will begin to functionally enhance OUR OFFERING
starting with the 2nd release..." to distinguish it from IBM JES3.
I'm just so used to saying "JES3," muscle memory got the better of me... LOL
On 10/3/2019 10:24
I was thinking along the lines of licensing. Does every JES3 shop that wants
to remain have to re-buy (I'm guessing yes)? Otherwise how's the money going
to be made?
_
Dave Jousma
AVP |
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 01:24, Ed Jaffe wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for all the support. As many of you know, we have
> been working with JES3 for decades, so it's a perfect fit for us.
Wow!
I'm not a JES3 guy, but the two obvious questions that come to mind are:
Is JESXCF used by JES3, and if
In this case the private key is in RACF, but thank you.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
What's the magic spell(s) to get SMF Signature Validation to work? I've been
trying for a couple of days and it's failed every time. Latest failure is this;
IFA741I UNABLE TO PERFORM SMF SIGNATURE VALIDATION
IFA742I SMF SIGNATURE VALIDATION FAILED DUE TO
INCONSISTENT RECORDS - FIRST FLAG
Good luck Ed. I am sure that there are a lot of JES3 people pleased with this.
Sincerely,
John T. Abell
Tel:800-295-7608Option 4
President
International: 1-416-593-5578 Option 4
E-mail: john.ab...@intnlsoftwareproducts.com
Fax:800-295-7609
International:
G'Day,
I want to scratch a tape which has a retention period of 1095 days. This is
what it looks when I query the tape:
RTN-SCHED(1) BY RMF 5DC1095
I saw this example in the TLMS doc. Would it scratch the tape?
/* //TLMSINQR EXEC CATINQR //CAIIPT DD *
See: https://github.com/CBTTape/290
It contains an implementation of subsystem datasets.
The documentation you WANT is the Washington Systems Center Technical Bulletin
GG66-3131-00, which, unfortunately, seems to have become Pure Unobtainium.
-- Jerry
Thanks Mark for the heads up. We've not seen the behavior noted in this APAR,
although I am tracking it now for closure. In my case, got lazy over the
years and hadn’t been paying attention to CSA/ECSA SQA/ESQA allocation and
utilization that has crept up. ESQA has been hovering around
Interesting. And no I didn’t know about it. Question: At what stage does
the ESQA into ECSA check wave a red (or orange) flag?
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 3 Oct 2019, at 22:34, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:18:32 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>
>> If you are running
ZEKE /ZENA is ASG product's ...check in
https://www.asg.com/en/Contact-Us.aspx
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:14 PM Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM <
kees.verno...@klm.com> wrote:
> Since you mention z/OS in your question, this is a correct place. This a
> generous forum of technical people, eager to
19 matches
Mail list logo
