On 2019-10-31 8:18 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
The documentation here is very vague So to my understanding If use I
CELQPIPI to with a INIT_SUB and GETSTOR,FREESTORE replacement and the
INIT_SUB initializes a C program does that mean when the C program does a
malloc the GETSTORE service routine
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 22:07:13 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>
>Actually, I am curious to the need of BPXBATCH altogether. I ponder,
>occasionally, if JCL could be changed somehow to support a kind of EXEC
>statement that would allow for a lower case parameter that would be the name
>of, or path
The documentation here is very vague So to my understanding If use I
CELQPIPI to with a INIT_SUB and GETSTOR,FREESTORE replacement and the
INIT_SUB initializes a C program does that mean when the C program does a
malloc the GETSTORE service routine is invoked and when the program does a
free the
Frank,
As one example, consider text manipulation and reformatting. In the *ix worlds
(including z/Linux), (g)awk and/or perl seem to be the languages of choice for
searching and/or rearranging and/or selecting data from text files. z/OS Unix
has at least a version of the awk utility that
As someone who rarely uses BPXBATCH, and doesn't have an alternate program, I'm
curious as to some of the major issues with BPXBATCH.
Actually, I am curious to the need of BPXBATCH altogether. I ponder,
occasionally, if JCL could be changed somehow to support a kind of EXEC
statement that
Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Does anyone happen to know the best way for a running task
to give up running and let another task run?
But - this isn't "give up" as in ending the task, just giving up
the CPU to allow another task to run and then returning to this
task.
Sorta like "I'm done for
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:51:28 +, Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
wrote:
>Hello group,
>
>We use DFSMSdss to move datasets from one sysplex to another.
>The method is:
>Dump the datasets with DFdss to a dumpdataset.
>FTP the dumpdataset to the other sysplex.
>Restore the datasets in the other
You are correct - you need to define a group (or userid) for every HLQ that you
will use in dataset profiles. That is how RACF works.
The owner of the group can be another group. For instance group SYS1 can be
owner of group ISP, then dataset profiles for ISP.** can be created.
Is there a concern? This isn't new?
APAR Identifier .. OA49263 Last Changed 19/03/29
NEW FUNCTION TO ENABLE SMF IN-MEMORY RESOURCES AND THE SMF
REAL-TIME INTERFACE
Symptom .. NF NFStatus ... CLOSED UR1
Severity ... 4
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 23:46:30 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
>http://planetmvs.com/freeware/dampf08.txt
>WTO from exit.
>
That seems to show:
**Descriptive Name = Notify user in real time of a critical **
**WTO message from a batch job that he **
**
Anyone have the server IP address to send a dump to Microfocus?
TIA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:29 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> BPBATCH still sucks. IBM is unlikely to enhance it because it competes
> with the separately priced AOPBATCH.
>
> It seems very unlikely to me that this is the reason.
Everyone should take a look at APAR OA49263
Steve
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:36:59 -0400, Don Poitras wrote:
>
>//* The idea here is that I'd like to see the commands printed
>//* along with the output. set -x will do that (while printing
>//* a "+" in front of the commands, but that's ok), but sends
>//* it's debugging output to stderr. By
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:27 AM David Crayford wrote:
> I have used COZBATCH for years but recently had a requirement to be able
> to ship something similar so we could install a web application from a
> PAX member using a batch job.
> I wrote my own batch shell utility using a tip from Kirk
If you're running authorized then DESC=3 should do what you want. Normally you
would do a DOM after the appropriate action was taken, but in your case I
assume that isn't relevant.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM
Hi Sean,
You forgot to include "GENERIC" on the ADDSD Command (unless you REALLY
want to create a Discrete Dataset Profile.)
RACF's behaviour is correct.
You can create a GROUP which has the appropriate access to 'ABC.DEF'.
You can CONNECT users to this GROUP (so that these users have access to
Hello group,
We use DFSMSdss to move datasets from one sysplex to another.
The method is:
Dump the datasets with DFdss to a dumpdataset.
FTP the dumpdataset to the other sysplex.
Restore the datasets in the other sysplex.
The problem is that the datasets that have the changebit OFF in the
I started this thread back in September, and got a lot of useful advice
from responders for which a heartfelt 'Thank You'.
Now I'm at the point of putting that advice in to action and I'm afraid
I've hit an apparent problem (in my eyes, at least).
I'm also using a RedBook "ABCs of z/OS System
That does a TPUT from the exit, not a WTO.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mike Schwab
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 12:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WTO
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:43:25 +, Jon Perryman wrote:
>I believe the OP mentioned he received complaints that his
>task was hogging the CPU.
I went back and looked. The OP said no such thing. In fact, the
OP has said nothing about why he wants to do this, despite
being asked no less than
When I looked into this a while back, here's what I came up with. I really don't
like the semi-colons and I really want to see the output along with the
commands.
I'm also a fan of having everything contained in one member so that I don't have
to maintain stuff in different spots.
---
//DONBPX2
I believe the OP mentioned he received complaints that his task was
hogging the CPU.
It would be unusual for "someone" to get complaints from "someone else"
about a task owned by that "someone", unless both the "someone" and the
"someone else" were running in the same address space at the
I guess you are right the C routines are exported functions I can put all of
them in the pre-init table and reference each of them with the token and proper
index the onky thing I’m not sure about is the exported data items whether I’ll
be able to reference them in the functions
Thanks for
Here is my "solution". Actually, I got it from someone R Zenuk. It consists
of a PROC, and a REXX program.
=== proc ===
//BPXJCL PROC USSCMD=,
//***
//* PROC: BPXJCL *
//*
On 2019-10-30 3:35 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
I haven’t spent hours but days I have found that it worked for a C program but
not a assembler that’s had the CELQPRLG macro
I tried it in the following manners
Why not use C? I'm struggling to think of a use-case for calling an LE
assembler
3270 with SSL/TLS is implemented in System SSL - if you really need to know
more I'd read up on that.
Another PAGENT policy function IPSEC tunnels does have the option for ZIIP
assist so if you're running 3270 or other traffic within tunnels you may be
using ZIIP.
Mike Wawiorko
This e-mail
Hi Peter,
You can use DFSMSdss.
Here is an example:
//STEP002 EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,COND=(4,LT,STEP001)
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD *
WTO 'PREVIOUS STEP ...'
Regards,
David
On 2019-10-30 00:22, Peter wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a WTO module which can write a message (highlight message) on a
Forgot to say that all the variations were used copying the example
Thanks
> On Oct 30, 2019, at 12:44 AM, David Crayford wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> You should know the answer to your question because it is clearly documented
> that you can
>
I haven’t spent hours but days I have found that it worked for a C program but
not a assembler that’s had the CELQPRLG macro
I tried it in the following manners
With out the service rtns parm getting a a x’20’
With the service rtns specifically CELQWLOD tracing it
Without an address entry in
Maybe there is a WTOR?
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019, 00:05 Peter wrote:
> The message displayed by WTO just comes up but i want it to br displayed as
> a RED colour message with outstanding message number to suppress by
> operator.
>
> On Wed, 30 Oct, 2019, 8:47 AM Mike Schwab,
> wrote:
>
> >
31 matches
Mail list logo
