Peter,
My issue with the exit was a user error ( mine ) we didnt copy and LLA
fresh the right library.
Scott
On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 10:22 AM Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw <
lenni...@rsmpartners.com> wrote:
> I seem to recall there was another such pointer in the SMF structures and
> I thought the Nasty
is the maximum number of JES2 managed initiators, but you can add WLM
managed initiators to your batch processing too. The WLM managed initiators
don't count against the limit.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch
Hi all,
What is the max initiator i can assign ? . Google says , in case
is correct , Why cant more than that. in INITDEF . Just a
curiosity question . Please guide me .
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arc
I seem to recall there was another such pointer in the SMF structures and I
thought the Nasty Wet Monster Bank used that. But maybe I am mixing things up.
Could have been some other bank.
These fields were great for local mods and I made extensive use of the CVTUSER
field in the 1980s to hold f
I confess I thought we were talking about a single installation.
But as I said, I was asking mainly out if interest, and to see whether IBM
have done anything with it, rather than making a recommendation.
Ruz
On Sun, 1 Dec 2019, 14:28 Peter Relson, wrote:
> Regarding CVTUSER, the problem, as C
Regarding CVTUSER, the problem, as Charles Mills alluded to, is that at
this point it is hard to "know" that no one else is using it.
It "should" be used only only with the approval of the customer that
"owns" the system.
But at this point, if you can't know that, many feel it not worth the
ris
About impossible for a vendor to deal with hundreds of customers' unique way of
sharing a single CVTUSER.
@Peter's vendor words work like a champ (voice of experience).
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Rupert