Re: Changing the volser of an HSM ML1 volume

2020-07-12 Thread Gadi Ben-Avi
Thanks Will HSM move the files already on the old volume, or do I have to do it myself? Gadi -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richard Marchant Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 9:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Changing the volser of an HSM

Re: Changing the volser of an HSM ML1 volume

2020-07-12 Thread Richard Marchant
Gadi, I would advise you do the following so HSM knows what's where: HSEND ADDVOL newvolser UNIT(3390) MIGRATION(ML1 NODRAIN) HSEND ADDVOL oldvolser UNIT(3390) MIGRATION(DRAIN) HSEND FREEVOL MVOL(oldvolser) AGE(0) TARGETLEVEL(ML1) Once complete you can DELVOL the oldvolser. HTH Richard March

Changing the volser of an HSM ML1 volume

2020-07-12 Thread Gadi Ben-Avi
Hi, I need to change the name of a HSM ML1 volume. The volume only contains VTOC files created by backups. Can I just create a new volume, define it to hsm and move the files to it? Gadi -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arc

Re: Free Mainframe Stuff 2020: Reply Here with Nominations

2020-07-12 Thread Timothy Sipples
Thanks for the nominations, some also coming in via direct e-mail. I'm seeing some freebies that I didn't know about, and that's terrific. Please keep them coming. - - - - - - - - - - Timothy Sipples I.T. Architect Executive Digital Asset & Other Industry Solutions IBM Z & LinuxONE - - - - - - -

Re: IHS NTLM authentication

2020-07-12 Thread Timothy Sipples
Jantje wrote: >If it were me, yes, we would go for that. But... If your organization has some sort of reasonable identity management service that provisions, de-provisions, and otherwise manages user identities, then you could probably hook TLS client certificate management for z/OS into that.

Re: IBM 2828-G01

2020-07-12 Thread Timothy Sipples
IBM Machine Type 2828 is an IBM zBC12 machine. As I write this (mid July, 2020), all the latest generally available IBM operating system releases support this machine model. These releases include: z/OS 2.4 z/VM 7.1 z/VSE 6.2 z/TPF (including the latest PUT as I write this) Certain operating sy

Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM products?

2020-07-12 Thread Al Ferguson
> On 12 July 2020, at 03:50, Israel Wagshal wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 17:09:32 -0500, Al Ferguson > wrote: > > Thank you for the insights. > > How do you change dynamically root filesystem's mount mode to R/W and back to > R/O? Using ISHELL as “root” (UID=0 or SU Command), under the FI

Re: Subject: Subject: Re: Where, oh where, is the IRB?

2020-07-12 Thread Binyamin Dissen
Thanks. Used a different TCB and all is well. On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 17:05:27 + Jim Mulder <030bfaf36c30-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: :>Yes, that will defer the dispatching of IRBs. :>Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie NY  :>| TCB has a sa

Re: Subject: Subject: Re: Where, oh where, is the IRB?

2020-07-12 Thread Jim Mulder
Yes, that will defer the dispatching of IRBs. Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie NY  | TCB has a saved EUT FRR, saved by|| WAIT ,LINKAGE=SYSTEM,EUT=SAVE|| That means that an IRB cannot run on the TCB? ---

Re: Subject: Subject: Re: Where, oh where, is the IRB?

2020-07-12 Thread Binyamin Dissen
TCB has a saved EUT FRR, saved by WAIT ,LINKAGE=SYSTEM,EUT=SAVE That means that an IRB cannot run on the TCB? On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 16:23:19 + Jim Mulder <030bfaf36c30-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: :> Various things can prevent dispatching an IRB.For example: TCBFX,

Re: Subject: Subject: Re: Where, oh where, is the IRB?

2020-07-12 Thread Seymour J Metz
Is the TCB address in the IQE the nominal address or the address of the TCB prefix? The reason that I'm asking is that it looks like IQE+C points to a word of zeros, which would seem to mean no RB chain unless it's the prefix. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 __

Subject: Subject: Re: Where, oh where, is the IRB?

2020-07-12 Thread Jim Mulder
 Various things can prevent dispatching an IRB.For example: TCBFX, TCBNOIRB, TCB has an EUT FRR, TCBPMC. Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie NY   -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch

Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM products?

2020-07-12 Thread John McKown
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 3:50 AM Israel Wagshal wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 17:09:32 -0500, Al Ferguson < > afergu...@neptunescove.org> wrote: > > Thank you for the insights. > > How do you change dynamically root filesystem's mount mode to R/W and back > to R/O? > as "root" or an ID with approp

Re: Where, oh where, is the IRB?

2020-07-12 Thread Seymour J Metz
Are you running in Primary, 31 bit? Is 007AAF88 the correct TCB address? Offset 8 should point to the DEB table, but 0013400E is only halfword aligned. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN

Re: Where, oh where, is the IRB?

2020-07-12 Thread Binyamin Dissen
No CIRB. SCHEDIRB EPPTR=@IRBRTN,TCBPTR=CURRTCB,MODE=SUPR,KEY=SUPR, PARAMPTR=@#HWORK,MF=(E,OSCHEDIRB,COMPLETE) When I took a trap after the SCHEDIRB, I saw that ASXBFIQE/ASXBLIQE were set: IQE is 007AAFE8 7F4B5D10 | ".). | 007

Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM products?

2020-07-12 Thread Israel Wagshal
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 08:54:12 +, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote: Thank you, Gadi. This is what I was missing... >The chmount command can change a file system from Read Only to Read/Write and >back. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM products?

2020-07-12 Thread Israel Wagshal
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 05:17:08 -0400, David Spiegel wrote: Yes, of course. The only valid indirect cataloging for PARMLIBs at LOADxx processing time are: 1) ** (six asterisks) 2) *MCAT* (Master Catalog's volume) 3) &SYSRS1 That's because their value is automatically establish

Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM products?

2020-07-12 Thread David Spiegel
Hi Israel AMV"SH, Shavua Tov! A side point ... If SYS1.PARMLIB is CATALOGd via a Symbolic (e.g. &SYSR1) your IPL will fail, however, for a successful it can be CATALOGd via VOL(*). Regards, David On 2020-07-12 04:50, Israel Wagshal wrote: On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 17:09:32 -0500, Al Ferguson wro

Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM products?

2020-07-12 Thread Gadi Ben-Avi
The chmount command can change a file system from Read Only to Read/Write and back. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Israel Wagshal Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2020 11:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM produ

Re: Is /usr/lpp reserved solely for IBM products?

2020-07-12 Thread Israel Wagshal
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 17:09:32 -0500, Al Ferguson wrote: Thank you for the insights. How do you change dynamically root filesystem's mount mode to R/W and back to R/O? What do you mean by saying "the IBM Root Filesystem is actually mount at /ipl-vol/ "? The Version root has to be mounted R/O o