OpenVPN certificate with x3270 emulator

2020-10-31 Thread Peter
Hello

Is there anyone in the group who has used OpenVPN certificate with x3270
emulator. I am trying to find a documentation which helps me to achieve
this.

Could someone please point me in the right direction ?

Peter

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: REXX: ADDRESS ISPEXEC failing with rc = -3

2020-10-31 Thread Seymour J Metz
> Is Lloyd posting on BITNET 

ITYM the news group bit.listserv.ibm-main; does BITNET even exist these days?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 11:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX: ADDRESS ISPEXEC failing with rc = -3

On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 20:34:42 -0400, Tom Conley wrote:

>On 10/30/2020 7:13 PM, lloyd christensen wrote:
>> Thanks, took that plus hours of cursing and trying different stuff. Finally 
>> got a different IKJEFTxx member and it worked. Lots of problems with it 
>> wanting to allocate the same profile I was logged on with, and aggravation 
>> with allocation issues for the profile and ISPFILE. Eventually got it though.
>>
Is Lloyd posting on BITNET where many of us can't see his questions, but
only your replies?

>If you don't care about saving anything in the profile, allocate a temp
>PDS dataset with a small allocation for ISPPROF.  Same for any other
>output files you don't care about saving.
>
+1
I do that regularly, not only to avoid ENQ conflicts but also in code for
general consumption where I want to control the environment and not
have it muddled by individual users' idiosyncratic profiles.

Likewise, any libraries specific to interactive operation such as panels
can be omitted, DUMMY, or DISP=(NEW,DELETE) in batch operations.

Unless the OP is heavily invested in ISPF craft this seems like something
that might be done more simply in pure Rexx with an IRXJCL step, shedding
the burden of ISPF and all its libraries.

Of course, I'd do such a chore in a POSIX shell script invoked by BPXBATCH,
AOPBATCH, BPXWUNIX, or COZBATCH.  Rexx has no instream data sets of
its own (but JCL SYSINs might suffice.)  Shell here-documents provide a
combination of symbol substitution and command substitution not available
with SYSIN DD DATA,SYMBOLS=...

I truly miss command substitution in JCL.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: VSAM-RLS and DFSMStvs basic questions

2020-10-31 Thread Jesse 1 Robinson
We were ESP for TVS back in the day. The product held a lot of promise for (I 
would say) larger shops who had to do VSAM updates during a limited batch 
window. The problem to solve was recovering from some kind of failure. From the 
dawn of time, the logic was to back up everything in sight before beginning the 
update cycle. If a serious failure occurred, everything would be restored and 
restarted. This was a time-consuming procedure. 

TVS allows a program to update a file that was concurrently open for read. No 
more need for mass backup/restore. But application programs for decades have 
been written to expect backup/restore. They would almost certainly need to be 
modified/rewritten to work with TVS. The end result would be great but 
difficult (read expensive) to achieve. 

We ended up not implementing the GA product. The cost of the product was less 
an issue than the cost of accommodating it. 

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of Joe 
Monk
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 4:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: VSAM-RLS and DFSMStvs basic questions

*** EXTERNAL EMAIL - Use caution when opening links or attachments ***

Radoslaw,

He is asking about shareoption (4 x)  not (x 4) aka cross-region sharing, not 
cross-system sharing.

In VSE, Shareoption(4) allows vsam file sharing among partitions (similar to a 
z/os address space). VSE manages  that automatically, for the user.

Joe

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 6:22 PM R.S.  wrote:

> W dniu 30.10.2020 o 23:51, Tony Thigpen pisze:
> > All,
> >
> > I have a z/VSE client that believes it is time to move to z/OS. But, 
> > they have one big concern. They have a lot of ShareOption=4 VSAM files.
> >
> > For those that don't know it, ShareOption=4 files on z/VSE "work out 
> > of the box" without any need for the application program to perform 
> > any enqueue or dequeue. z/VSE automatically performs those 
> > functions, unlike z/OS where the application has to handle the enqueue 
> > process.
> >
> > In their case, they use shareoption=4 so that they can update VSAM 
> > files from batch Cobol programs while at the same time CICS Cobol 
> > programs are also updating the files. They don't want to have to 
> > change their programs.
> >
> > From my initial research, it appears that this same function can be 
> > reproduced on z/OS using DFHSMStvs. (And, it looks like VSAM-RLS is 
> > also required to support DFHSMStvs.)
> >
> > Are we going down the right path?
>
> IMHO no.
>
> Some remarks:
> 1. Any migration will require some work to do. Sometimes little less 
> effort give you much worse results.
> 2. SHR (x 4) means cross-system sharing. Why it is cross-system? Why 
> don't you consolidate it into one system? What are the reasons?
> 3. VSAM RLS is almost free - that means it is not licensed, but it 
> require Coupling Facility - even in single system configuration. Such 
> kind of Parallel Sysplex. Even when you want to have single CPC, you 
> still need CPU engine for CF, that is ICF processor. It is approx. 
> 250k$ (for big machine). And some memory. However tvs is not necessary. Note:
> tvs is paid, because there are ISV options. And there are some IBM 
> add-ons like CICSVR, etc.
> 4. Let's go back to point 1 - maybe it is good time to move from VSAM 
> to Db2? Note, there is special software product which allow VSAM 
> application to work with Db2 with minimal changes. And of course you 
> would have a lot of Db2 advantages over VSAM, and any new development 
> could directly interface with Db2, not Db2 under cover of VSAM. Of 
> course neither the product, nor Db2 is free, but...
>
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS 2.4 and FTP server with FTP ATTLS verifying client certificates

2020-10-31 Thread Joshua Bennetone
If the Core FTP LE client is running on your local PC then you will only
need a TTLSRule to protect the FTP server.  Otherwise you would need two
separate rules: one for the server and another for the client.

Assuming your FTP client is not running on Z there are two things from the
policy that I would change in the TTLSRule:
1) The LocalPortRange should be the port that your FTP server is listening
on (typically 21).
2) The Direction should be INBOUND.

I would also make sure your keystore database
/usr/local/certificates/BCI.kdb contains the following:
- Personal certificate for FTP server
- Certificate Authority (CA) that signed the FTP server's personal
certificate
- Certificate Authority (CA) that signed the remote FTP client's personal
certificate (since you are doing client authentication)


Best regards,
Josh Bennetone
z/OS CommServer Developer

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: REXX: ADDRESS ISPEXEC failing with rc = -3

2020-10-31 Thread Tom Conley

On 10/30/2020 11:24 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:


Is Lloyd posting on BITNET where many of us can't see his questions, but
only your replies?



Gil,

Probably, I was echoing the list because the question of how to run ISPF 
in batch comes up a lot.


Regards,
Tom Conley

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN