Re: ESPIE IC > 15?

ABEND S0C4 was overloaded since SVS, but I remember seeing the correct interrupt code reported on dumps and in APAR descriptions, e.g., PK00040. What I really want is a separate ABEND code and SPIE mask bit for each type of program check, but that ship has sailed. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

Re: ESPIE IC > 15?

It has worked that way for PIC x'10' and x'11' since MVS/XA, 40 years ago. '38' - x'3B' were added via APAR OW57082, 19 years ago. It looks to me like the original interrupt code would be in STCBOLCP, but STCBOLCP is not designated as a Programming Interface. What you would really want

Re: ESPIE IC > 15?

Ouch! Those overloaded odes make diagnosis more difficult. Thanks. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Jim Mulder [d10j...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Sunday, March

Re: Job submission from CMS to MVS

Shmuel, I use have the VM 'submit' exec spool it to a disconnected user that in turn submits the jcl to z/OS via FTP. I use RSCS to get the output back to the original user (if needed). I use FTP because I don't have RACF on z/VM and RSCS does not properly pass the credentials without

Re: ESPIE IC > 15?

The code did not work, and appeared to have not worked for a long time. We could not come up with any use for a function that would give control to an ESPIE exit before invoking the Real Storage Manager for a DAT exception. There would not seem to be anything useful that an ESPIE exit

Re: ESPIE IC > 15?

Even if MVS marked unused segment table entries as invalid, processing PGM IC=16 ('10'X) would be much faster because allocating an empty page table wouldn't require any I/O. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe

Re: ESPIE IC > 15?

Well, why was 17 allowed, but not 16? That seems random, and at least it's consistent now. Along with the codes for region table exceptions. And anyway, supervisor state is not allowed, much less required. sas On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 11:06 AM Seymour J Metz wrote: > The use of ESPIE with IC

Re: Job submission from CMS to MVS

Shmuel I use RSCS to z/OS 2.4 here; works great. DJ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Job submission from CMS to MVS

I was thinking of CMS and MVS under the same CP. Yes, I forgot that FTP was another option, and I'd like to see those numbers as well. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: Job submission from CMS to MVS

Is there a workstation program for CMS? That would certainly work, and I'd be curious how many are using it, or SNA from CMS, for that matter. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: ESPIE IC > 15?

The use of ESPIE with IC 17 was documented in the authorized macro reference, so it was available for customer use. It's no more restricted than, e.g., ATTACH RSAPF=YES, and doesn't even reqquire Supervisor mode, just APF or system key. I'm hoping someone from IBM knows. -- Shmuel (Seymour

Re: ESPIE IC > 15?

"The following description of the SPIE macro also appears in z/OS MVS Programming: Assembler Services Reference ABE-HSP , with the exception of interruption type 17. This interruption type designates page faults and its use

Re: Job submission from CMS to MVS

Hi R'Shmuel AMV"SH, Gut Voch How about via TCP/IP from CMS? Regards, David On 2022-03-06 09:58, Seymour J Metz wrote: There are two obvious way to submit an MVS job from CMS: 1. Spool it ti RSCS and let it go in via NJE 2. Spool it to a virtual reader on MVS I'm curious as to how many

Re: Job submission from CMS to MVS

On Mar 6, 2022, at 07:58:17, Seymour J Metz wrote: > > There are two obvious way to submit an MVS job from CMS: > > 1. Spool it ti RSCS and let it go in via NJE > > 2. Spool it to a virtual reader on MVS > (Not for real MVS.) 3. (Not obvious?) FTP SITE FILE=JES. (Works alike from

Re: ESPIE IC > 15?

Thanks. Any idea why they took it away? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Joe Monk [joemon...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 6, 2022 10:16 AM To:

Re: ESPIE IC > 15?

Looks like as of z/OS 2.3. 2.2 doc: If a program interruption occurs, the SPIE/ESPIE exit receives control only when all of the following conditions exist: - The interrupted program is a problem state program. - The program interrupt code is in the range 1–15 and 17. 2.3 doc: If a

Job submission from CMS to MVS

There are two obvious way to submit an MVS job from CMS: 1. Spool it ti RSCS and let it go in via NJE 2. Spool it to a virtual reader on MVS I'm curious as to how many shops do which, and how they're configured. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

Re: JES2 DUPL_JOB parameter

Back in olden days there was a RDINUM JES2 parameter specifying max number of Internal Readers, and I believe it was a fairly low value (less than 5 as I recall on our initial MVS/XA system in the 1980's), either the default or recommended value at the time.  I remember having to increase that

ESPIE IC > 15?

When did ESPIE stop supporting interrupt code 17? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the