Re: Question About ADRDSSU

2022-04-11 Thread Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
Paul, Assuming your sentence including "beginning with MONSOON,V70" was intended to say "beginning with MONSOON.V70" I still think this will only move data sets starting MONSOON.V70. (note the final "."). Data sets such as "MONSOON.V70MORE" would not be moved. If data sets of the same name

Question About ADRDSSU

2022-04-11 Thread esst...@juno.com
. Hello . I have a question regarding ADRDSSU - In the past I have used the following control statements to MOVE a specific dataset from one volume to another. . //COPYMOVE EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=7M,TIME=99 //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //OUTVOL1 DD

Re: IBM Deceived Investors

2022-04-11 Thread Mike Schwab
Xerox was caught booking copier / printer revenue when the sale was made, not when the actual payments were received, in 1997-2000. I think the stockholders got some money for the boosted revenues. https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/complr17465.htm On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 9:42 PM

Re: IBM Deceived Investors

2022-04-11 Thread Charles Mills
If you report revenue in category X when it was actually in category Y I believe that would be misleading investors and could result in criminal or civil exposure, even if the total dollars were correct. I am not saying IBM did that; just saying that if some company did that ... What CA did

Re: IBM Deceived Investors

2022-04-11 Thread Bill Johnson
Bingo Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Monday, April 11, 2022, 4:34 PM, Mike Schwab wrote: Did IBM inflate their total number?  That could result in criminal charges and stockholder lawsuits. Sounds like they just moved actual revenues from one category to another category to get bonuses. 

Re: IBM Deceived Investors

2022-04-11 Thread Mike Schwab
Did IBM inflate their total number? That could result in criminal charges and stockholder lawsuits. Sounds like they just moved actual revenues from one category to another category to get bonuses. I expect only clawback from the employees. On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 5:08 PM Bill Johnson

Re: Don't shoot the messenger

2022-04-11 Thread Mike Schwab
z processors before z13 IPL in 31 bit mode and the OS changes to 64 bit mode. z13+ IPL in 64 bit mode and require z/VM to run 31 bit mode. On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 3:56 PM PINION, RICHARD W. wrote: > > Will OS/390 2.9 run under z/VM on a z114 processor? > I think it won't. But, someone else says

Re: Command execution through OUTTRAP giving rc -1645

2022-04-11 Thread Hobart Spitz
I don't think VARSTORAGE(HIGH) is the best approach. I would stick with LOW. The message suggests that RACF is running out of storage. .OUTTRAP knows nothing about userlists, so it's probably not an OUTTRAP message. Further, the return code is not from OUTTRAP, it is from the command being

Re: z16 documentation discrepancy

2022-04-11 Thread Martin Packer
I’m not sure if this is a metathread about consistency or not  but let me assume not. With z/OS 2.5 you can go above 4TB – up to 16TB – but only with 2GB pages. And these aren’t your ordinary run of the mill pages. Think Db2 BPs, Java Heap, zCX. (We talked about this – Marna and I in the last

z16 documentation discrepancy

2022-04-11 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
Actually it is not z16 specific, similar discrepancies could be observed for previous generations. I mean memory limits for given LPAR modes (General, CF, z/VM, Linux Only) and operating systems. Example: PR/SM Planning says z/OS 2.5 is limited to 4TB, while it was announced the limit was

Re: [TSO-REXX] Command execution through OUTTRAP giving rc -1645

2022-04-11 Thread Vaid Laturkar
Gil, thanks for the other options but since this exec has been executing successfully for years at multiple customers and the current situation is unique, really looking to get this fixed/clarified. On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 11:03 PM Paul Gilmartin <

Re: [TSO-REXX] Command execution through OUTTRAP giving rc -1645

2022-04-11 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Apr 11, 2022, at 10:51:12, Vaid Laturkar wrote: > > cross post to IBM-MAIN, TSO REXX. > (I do not see your most recent ply on IBM-MAIN) > We have a long running REXX exec working at different customer sites. > This uses OUTTRAP to trap output of RACF command 'SEARCH CLASS(USER)' and > then

Re: IBM Deceived Investors

2022-04-11 Thread Bill Johnson
Also, just received an email that I was part of the class settlement against Apple. I can’t wait for my $5. I’ve been part of these class action lawsuits at least 20 times over the years. Ambulance chasers who go after bigger fish. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Monday, April 11, 2022,

Re: IBM Deceived Investors

2022-04-11 Thread Bill Johnson
I worked for Phar Mor. Where the CEO and his minions actually cooked the books. And went to prison. 10 years for the CEO. 3 for the CFO. Gained some street smarts. (More on street smarts later) The civil suits came AFTER the criminal ones. This case is a joke. The board approved. The auditors

Re: Don't shoot the messenger

2022-04-11 Thread Tony Thigpen
I am running OS/390 2.10 on a z10 native. You must have the z990 compatibility feature installed. You can only run 31bit and you must not try to set the date/time during the IPL. IOCP must be done on HMC. I am using newer DS8000 so flash-copy does not work because the OS does not recognize the

Re: IBM Deceived Investors

2022-04-11 Thread Steve Beaver
The problem becomes if in discovery something is unearthed -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Bill Johnson Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2022 11:36 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Deceived Investors Nobody

Re: Don't shoot the messenger

2022-04-11 Thread Allan Staller
I think it depends on the processor being emulated by the z/VM system. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of PINION, RICHARD W. Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 9:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Don't shoot the messenger [CAUTION: This Email is

Don't shoot the messenger

2022-04-11 Thread PINION, RICHARD W.
Will OS/390 2.9 run under z/VM on a z114 processor? I think it won't. But, someone else says it will. Confidentiality notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the