Not true for non-static calls. We are past COBOL 5 (V6.2 at the moment) and
"CALL variable USING . . . " where "variable" has any of the "national"
characters ($#@) works every time. We have multiple dynamically called utility
subroutines with those characters in the program name.
Why in the
Here's a false one you could still make true:
"I’m out until David post more BS."
On 4/7/2023 8:35 PM, Bill Johnson wrote:
It should be easy to list the dozens of false things I've posted here. Can I
see at least half a dozen?
On Friday, April 7, 2023 at 11:28:35 PM EDT, Frank
That's exactly what we suggest to our Syzygy Automation Suite product sites.
They start automation SUB=MSTR, and then set a script entry that starts it up
again and ends the one that it's currently executing under when JES is
successfully up and executing. I don't see any reason why Netview
For those interested, the following calls C function "@@GETCB" ( int
__getcb(int); ) passing the fullword 3 by value. There are several
alternatives, as discussed earlier, but this is what I am going with.
***
* see if we're
Just so you know, it's not SYSPLEX that you need, it's GRS and you have have
that with just a couple FICON ports.
I have been doing it at several sites now that really don't need CF's (and some
who can't afford them) and it works very well, no problems at all.
Brian
It should be easy to list the dozens of false things I've posted here. Can I
see at least half a dozen?
On Friday, April 7, 2023 at 11:28:35 PM EDT, Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
The first one is iffy, but the second one can be absolutely true. It's best
to at least know when one doesn't
I’m well aware when I don’t know something. Please list the things I’ve stated
that weren’t true.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, April 7, 2023, 11:28 PM, Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
The first one is iffy, but the second one can be absolutely true. It's best to
at least know when
The first one is iffy, but the second one can be absolutely true. It's best to
at least know when one doesn't know something.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Matt Hogstrom
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 7:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 at 20:44, Paul Gilmartin
<042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
[...]
> Heck, you can't even:
> //RUN EXEC PGM='MYNAME.LINKLIB(MYFILE)',PARM='Wonbat'
>
> Even though TSO lets you:
> CALL 'MYNAME.LINKLIB(MYFILE)' 'Wonbat'
>
> And why does TSO force the
Your comment wasn’t directed at my but it made me think of two of my favorite
phrases.
"I’m proud of my humility."
“I’m smart enough to know how dumb I can be.”
Enjoy the Easter weekend all y’all.
Matt Hogstrom
“It may be cognitive, but, it ain’t intuitive."
— Hogstrom
>
> Are you also
Is it the case that the parameter in the SQL parameter ATTACH option (TSO, CAF,
etc.) does not matter as long as the DSNULI stub is included in the program
bind? This appears to me to be the case, but I want someone to specifically
state it for me in case I am misunderstanding.
Also, how do I
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 22:10:15 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>z/OS for UNIX files holds program objects, just like PDSE as far as I know.
>Now all we need is
>//RUN EXEC PGM='/u/myname/myexefile'
>
Heck, you can't even:
//RUN EXEC PGM='MYNAME.LINKLIB(MYFILE)',PARM='Wonbat'
Even though TSO
You still retired? Golfing? How’s everything?
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, April 7, 2023, 7:44 PM, william janulin
<008d52e04f2e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
I think everyone should lighten up a bit. We care all professionals and our
jobs care demanding enough
++1
On 4/7/2023 7:43 PM, william janulin wrote:
I think everyone should lighten up a bit. We care all professionals and our jobs care
demanding enough without getting into trivial " spitting " contests that help
no one. This forum should be one that is a tool that all of us can benefit from.
BillPlease get off the cross and stop telling everyone how great you are.
The actual greats never have to convince everyone that their great. Here's a
word you need to embrace is "HUMBLE"...try it some time.
Thanks,
Tom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
I think everyone should lighten up a bit. We care all professionals and our
jobs care demanding enough without getting into trivial " spitting " contests
that help no one. This forum should be one that is a tool that all of us can
benefit from.
Just saying,. Bill J.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on
First off, I’ve NEVER said I know it all. Many of you can’t even comprehend
simple English. But, there are some here who think they are an expert at
everything and post hundreds of times a week. Absolutely nothing I posted this
week has been proven wrong. Challenger banks were never going to
And you are the poster child. Pathetic.
Doug Fuerst
-- Original Message --
From: "Bill Johnson" <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 07-Apr-23 18:23:33
Subject: Re: Stop the ragging on COBOL please [was: RE: ASM call by
value]
Many
I'll try all that on our sandbox system. Thanks all.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, April 7th, 2023 at 5:21 PM, Steve Horein
Congratulations, excellent.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, April 7, 2023, 6:41 PM, Mike Schwab wrote:
ACT score 31 of 35 in 1979-80 ranked 99%, not sure of IQ but did get
me into Mensa.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 5:28 PM Bill Johnson
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
ACT score 31 of 35 in 1979-80 ranked 99%, not sure of IQ but did get
me into Mensa.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 5:28 PM Bill Johnson
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Not vain at all. But, I’ve been tested for high IQ. 145. Also received state
> awards in high school for
Try dataname:
XX PROGNAME PIC X(08) VALUE 'progname'..
XX can be 77 or a regular level number.
Then, CALL PROGNAME parms...
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023, 5:25 PM Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
> Literal. The compiler flags it as not allowed.
>
> From: IBM Mainframe
Not vain at all. But, I’ve been tested for high IQ. 145. Also received state
awards in high school for Algebra and Geometry. Which earned me some
scholarship money.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, April 7, 2023, 6:24 PM, Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
Are you also modest, or are you
Literal. The compiler flags it as not allowed.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Charles Hardee
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 4:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Cobol calling module with non alphanumeric no longer allowed???
Are
Are you also modest, or are you vain?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 4:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Not aging well (know-it-alls)
I
Many here are prime examples.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, April 7, 2023, 6:18 PM, Mike Schwab wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 5:13 PM Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
>
> No one knows as little as one who think's he knows it
I've never had issues with inlined code when using IBM Debugger. I've never
explicitly checked its behavior, but I've never run in to an issue. We use
OPT(1) [for some probably bad reason not OPT(2)].
The only times I've seen the issue Tom is referring to are:
1. We backed out the latest
Exactly right. Which describes many here.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, April 7, 2023, 6:13 PM, Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
No one knows as little as one who think's he knows it all.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Doug
Sent:
How about someone who knows everything about release foo but doesn't understand
that it could change in release bar, and therefore never hits the updated
manuals?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 5:13 PM Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
>
> No one knows as little as one who think's he knows it all.
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
> Doug
> Sent: Friday, April
I agree that it's likely a subscript range overflow. I believe I had this same
symptom for a program, and the cause was trying to write beyond my
working-storage (because of attempting to subscript beyond the length of a
table.) It wiped out some file area control blocks and caused this
While this is true, in that you can't look at, say, Fault Analyzer if it's dump
is for a previous version, even having a separate debug file won't generally
save you from that. Because you'd usually put the new version there as well.
From: IBM Mainframe
It's an 8 character token used to uniquely identify the job.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Steve Horein [steve.hor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April
No one knows as little as one who think's he knows it all.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Doug
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 12:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Stop the ragging on COBOL please [was: RE: ASM call by value]
Are you doing a call literal or call dataname?
On Friday, April 7, 2023, Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
> I've tried calling modules (that exist!) with both '@' and '#' signs in
> them and Enterprise COBOL 5+ does not allow this. COBOL 4 allowed this.
> Is there any good reason why this is the case?
>
z/OS for UNIX files holds program objects, just like PDSE as far as I know.
Now all we need is
//RUN EXEC PGM='/u/myname/myexefile'
And, of course, allowing UNIX files in JOBLIB/STEPLIB.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin
The first two are equivalent. The third command releases the log data for
processing; whether it reclaims space depend on the SYSOUT class definition and
any overriding // OUTPUT (if that's supported under MSTR)..
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
I've tried calling modules (that exist!) with both '@' and '#' signs in them
and Enterprise COBOL 5+ does not allow this. COBOL 4 allowed this. Is there
any good reason why this is the case?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
I don’t lie, cheat, steal, smoke, do drugs, drink alcohol. I do lots a charity,
give huge tips, help animal shelters, and much much more.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, April 7, 2023, 4:26 PM, Mike Shaw wrote:
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023, 1:02 PM Bill Johnson <
I meant to include that I didn't find the doc very clear relating to:
$T REQJOBID,JESLOG=SUPPRESS
Is "Jobid" the JES2 number, or can it be a name, or is it literal and touch
"all" jobs?
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 4:18 PM Steve Horein wrote:
> Okay, I logged onto to work to see what was happening.
Okay, I logged onto to work to see what was happening.
JES3 shop. Every night at 22:00, the following command is issued:
*F J=NETVIEW,NOLOG,N=ALL
I don't know if this is an equivalent command for JES2 (
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=section-t-reqjobid-set-jobid-attributes
):
$T
Anyone have an idea of what the actual name of zPLX is?
I'm trying to name it correctly in my load module analyzer compiler name
translation table.*
I tried scanning SYS1.MACLIB for comments. There are no lines with PL/X and a
Z, so it might not be zPL/X or PL/X for z/OS. But there are
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023, 1:02 PM Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> <...snip...>
> I know my character is flawless.
<...snip...>
Wow.
Mike Shaw
MVS/QuickRef Support
Chisoft
--
For IBM-MAIN
I'm sorry if my messages have been bothersome to the group. I tend to
get drawn into unproductive discussions, which is a personal flaw. From
now on, I'll focus solely on technical discussions.
On 7/4/23 23:50, Dave Jousma wrote:
I seem to notice a trend here on IBM-MAIN. Ive been active
An idea: Is your program CALLing a subroutine/program? Could it
be that program is overlaying past working-storage?
If so, try PARMCHECK for the programs. It has a subparm, MSG|ABD
(issue message or ABEND), followed by length (which defaults to
100 bytes).
If that area gets
I would guess that it's not a trend, just a blip - in the forum, I mean, though
not necessarily in individuals. I will agree that all humans are in the
process of growing more like whatever it is we're becoming, a tautology that
should scare some of us and reässure others. Or as Rick Joyner
IDCAMS Print will print the record in text and hex. Skip to just get
the previous records and attempt the failing record.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 1:35 PM Schmitt, Michael wrote:
>
> Since no one else has answered, I'll speculate.
>
> One possibility is that the file is fine, but it is driving
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 17:18:52 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul Gilmartin
>> >
>> Do program objects in a z/FS directory satisfy (some) requirements for PDSE?
>
>Maybe, but you still cant share without SYSPLEX
>
In the old, old days, before *HFS* sharing
I’m seldom right. Except with respect to challenger banks, mainframe not going
bye bye, ING stock being big time terrible, spending 4 years learning investing
from one of the smartest investment advisors in America, being a contestant on
Who Wants to be a Millionaire, getting a 10k reward for
That would be a failure of your development lifecycle process. Anything
running in production MUST have compile listings available of the exact version
running in production, and it doesn't hurt to retain the binder listing too.
If you are still running an "older version" in production and
My bet is you watch Fox.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, April 7, 2023, 2:14 PM, Doug wrote:
"Seldom right, but never uncertain." Frank Reagan.
Describing you, I'd venture
Doug Fuerst
-- Original Message --
From: "Bill Johnson"
Are you talking about a scenario where you can't reproduce the ABEND in the
recopmiled version? If not, why do you want the old symbol table, etc.?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Yes, it will. And if you are debugging an abend that occurred with an older
version of the program, the listing is no longer available in the program
object.
--
Tom Marchant
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 18:33:18 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Won't that replace the NOLOAD segments with the new ones?
>
Are you running NETVIEW SUB=MSTR so that it can start earlier in the IPL?
Have you considered stopping it after the IPL is complete and restarting it to
run under JES?
--
Tom Marchant
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 18:01:11 +, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
>The problem is with our Netview STCs. They execute
Since no one else has answered, I'll speculate.
One possibility is that the file is fine, but it is driving application logic
that is stomping on LE, leading to the internal error. If COBOL, try compiling
with SSRANGE. And add the HEAPCHK(ON) LE runtime option, such as via CEEOPTS
DD. HEAPCHK
Won't that replace the NOLOAD segments with the new ones?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Tom
Marchant [000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Until the program is recompiled and relinked.
--
Tom Marchant
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 10:48:04 -0700, Tom Ross wrote:
>With the
>NOLOAD class program segmenets in new COBOL the debugging data is always
>available, always in sync
Just blue sky here -- But decades ago I developed SEGMENT (macro
and a subroutine) for DOS to MVS migrations to match what
DOS/POWER did. I understand that IBM now has implemented a better
version of what I wrote in the '80s. This *may* allow you to get
JES to "spin" the specified DD names if
I just tried that. No difference in what I'm observing in JESMSGLG.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, April 7th, 2023 at 2:13 PM,
"Seldom right, but never uncertain." Frank Reagan.
Describing you, I'd venture
Doug Fuerst
-- Original Message --
From: "Bill Johnson" <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 07-Apr-23 13:36:27
Subject: Re: Stop the ragging on COBOL
We do START NETVIEW,SUB=MSTR,MSGLEVEL=(0,0) for NetView.
I have not tried omitting the MSGLEVEL parameter to see if it really makes
a difference or not.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 1:01 PM Mark Jacobs <
0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> The problem is with our Netview STCs.
The problem is with our Netview STCs. They execute under MSTR and on our GDPS
systems can stay up for months and months at a time. Their JESMSGLG can grow to
several million lines which consumes a non-insignificant amount of spool space.
I was hoping to add JESLOG=SUPPRESS to its job card to
I think it depends on the started task first issuing a Request
JOB ID CALL to JES. Then you get minimal JES support. At that
point the JOBLOG= may possibly have meaning. Take this with some
salt, because I haven't done this level of programming for many
years and do not currently have the
>BTW: I didn't say "strange debugging option"; what is strange IMO is the=20
>fact
>that COBOL requires the modules in PDSEs not because the language needs=20
>this,
>but only to support some debugging tools, which could IMO store their=20
>information
>at another place. But the COBOL community
I have a math major, studied Accounting in college before switching to Criminal
Justice then later to computer science & math. Then as my number 1 hobby,
learned the stock market from a guy who was on the cover of Barron’s magazine
and invested rather wisely over the last 40 years. I made 1
Mirror
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, April 7, 2023, 9:48 AM, Joe Monk wrote:
"I know more about banking than you know it alls."
You dont know what you dont know.
Joe
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 9:16 PM Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I know
You don’t really understand Twitter do you? If I follow the WaPo, the NYT, the
Guardian, the LA Times, the Miami Herald, the Associated Press, Al Jazeera
English, NPR, PBS, BBC, and science magazines, scientists, journalists,
lawyers, and other fact based sources, it’s like subscribing to them
Crayford originally said challenger banks and posted these 5. Startling, Yolt,
Monzo, Moneze, N26. Of those 5 from his mention last year, almost all 5 have
either closed, pulled out of some markets, had CEO quit, & none are thriving.
Blowing his theory they will replace real banks.
When money
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 9:47 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Just PDSE
>
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 16:17:04 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>
> >The issue with this has always been
This might be a silly question, but does the JESLOG parameter on a job card do
anything when a started job executes under the master subsystem rather than
under JES2?
Mark Jacobs
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com), Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
I like this. It’s why I don’t care what listers think about me. I know my
character is flawless. My reputation is one of challenging bullsh*t. Many don’t
like to be challenged. I’m retired now. (Recent) It gives you a freedom you
don’t have throughout life where you have to bite your tongue.
Ditto!
Thank You and Please Be Safe!
Len Sasso
Systems Administrator Senior
CSRA, A General Dynamics Information Technology Company
327 Columbia TPKE
Rensselaer, NY 12144
TEAM: Together Everyone Achieves More
Office Hours: M-F 7 AM - 3:30 PM
Out-Of-The-Office:
Cell: (518) 894-0879
I'd love to know if they figure out new ways to lend or save money. I
guess different vehicles may qualify (CD's, Money Market's, etc.) but
loans are generally mortgages, personal, cars (which is a form of
personal anyway) and commercial. I thought they figured out every way
possible to give
I’ve got a plethora of Engineers in my family. They were all able to get
employed pre-social media/LinkedIn.
I don’t think there are many idiots on here. There are some who embellish their
skillsets and some AH’s who use the platform for their egos.
I’ve worked with a lot of brilliant people in
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 16:17:04 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>The issue with this has always been and still is the fact that you cannot
>safely share PDES without SYSPLEX (perhaps not full SYSPLEX) ...
>
Do program objects in a z/FS directory satisfy (some) requirements for PDSE?
--
gil
I have a program that abends with a U4038 on file close. This only happens
when a specific record is on an input file. No record, no problem.
This is from the dump -
IGZ0099C Internal error CLOSE-FIB was detected in module IGZ@QSAM.
From compile unit at entry point at compile
The issue with this has always been and still is the fact that you cannot
safely share PDES without SYSPLEX (perhaps not full SYSPLEX) but still more
than our small couple LPAR shop needed, And since our development to production
path was from Development LPAR to Production LPAR via libraries
Thank you for your comments and sanity.
I hope everyone here has a great Passover, happy Good Friday, a great Easter,
and generally a relaxing and enjoyable weekend.
Enjoy life
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
“Worry more about your
I seem to notice a trend here on IBM-MAIN. Ive been active for probably 25
years on it, and the benefits I have received, and presume at least some of the
advice/info I have provided has been helpful for some.
But what I notice, and I know none of these people personally, is that as folks
I didn't say anything about creating a LM or PO directly. I don't know
specifics on how it's done, but the debug data ends up as a NOLOAD segment of a
PO if the TEST(NOSEPARATE) option is specified.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Seymour J
Re fake resumes: I learned a long time ago not to trust any resume not given
directly by the applicant. And if you're the applicant, don't assume that the
agency didn't add skills that you don't have.
In the specific case of LinkedIn, that issue shouldn't exist, but there may be
serious
Thanks. By "modern financial technology" do you suppose they're talking about
things like on-line banking apps? Because pretty much everyone does that
nowadays - so, as you said, "just banks". On the other hand maybe "financial
technology" means trying out new practices in borrowing and
Off the net:
So-called challenger banks are in most cases small modern retail banks
which challenge longer-established institutes by offering modern
financial technology and are more focused on the customer. This way they
want to “challenge” the old banks. Challenger banks are also called neo
I've following this thread mostly because I'm bored and it has mild
entertainment value, but I'm handicapped by not knowing what a "challenger
bank" is. Can someone define it?
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* Every year, on April 15, all members of Congress would
So you get your "news" from Twitter. For me, that explains ALOT!
Doug Fuerst
-- Original Message --
From: "Bill Johnson" <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 07-Apr-23 8:23:03
Subject: Re: Stop the ragging on COBOL please [was: RE: ASM
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023, at 13:23, Bill Johnson wrote:
> I’ve read numerous articles and analysis that indicates LinkedIn has a
> problem with embellished & fake resumes. Here’s one.
>
>
"I know more about banking than you know it alls."
You dont know what you dont know.
Joe
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 9:16 PM Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I know more about banking than you know it alls. Already proved Crayford
> wrong regarding the
I would be tempted to just switch to PDSE and be done with it. Of course, that
doesn't help with the C++ issue, but it's still one less thing to worry about.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Bernd Oppolzer
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023
So by you lying about people's beliefs and motives is a sign of highest regard?
I suggest that you take your own advice.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
David Crayford
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 12:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
I’ve read numerous articles and analysis that indicates LinkedIn has a problem
with embellished & fake resumes. Here’s one.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/29/linkedin-has-a-fake-profile-problem-can-it-fix-this-blot-on-its-cv
I also don’t like having my information on the
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023, at 05:36, Bill Johnson wrote:
> Yes Bill Johnson is my real name and I’ve never been on LinkedIn.
> That’s just an ego trip and place where people like you go for
> confirmation...
I've certainly seen some people use it as an ego-trip, for "networking"
and - presumably -
91 matches
Mail list logo
