IBM Open Enterprise SDK for Node.js 20 is now available!

2023-11-14 Thread Fang Lu
IBM Open Enterprise SDK for Node.js 20 is now available! This latest release brings exciting updates and features that Node.js developers on the IBM Z platform will appreciate such as the experimental Permission Model, synchronous import.meta.resolve, the stable test runner, updates to the V8

Re: UNIX "BLKSIZE"?

2023-11-14 Thread Jon Perryman
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 20:14:37 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >What's XSAM? Cite an IBM or general IT source. Tony used the term first and you want to rag on me. It's a lowercase "x" which I take as meaning the group of Sequential Access Methods (e.g. QSAM, BSAM, VSAM, ...).

Re: UNIX "BLKSIZE"?

2023-11-14 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 19:04:44 -0600, Jon Perryman wrote: > >xSAM works because UNIX files are 1 logical record and it's I/O methods makes >each byte of that logical record easily addressable. A single read can read >starting at any byte location desired for 1 byte, 1,000 bytes or to the end of

Re: UNIX "BLKSIZE"?

2023-11-14 Thread Jon Perryman
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 19:09:26 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote: >Not all z/OS UNIX filesystems are VSAM linear datasets, nor do such >datasets directly match the UNIX file semantics. ZFS and HFS are filesystems, not files so why would they match UNIX file semantics? Files in z/OS filesystems match

Re: RACF, the FACILITY class, and z/XDC

2023-11-14 Thread Jack Zukt
Hi, Rver since IBM gave us CDT, user defined classes migration stopped being a problem. You no longer need the assembler macros to define user classes. Everything is in the RACF database. Best wishes Jack On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, 08:42 Rob Scott wrote: > Although setting up your own SAF class is

Re: ATTACHX/STIMERM WAIT=YES

2023-11-14 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 12:49:54 + Peter Relson wrote: :>As was alluded to, if it doesn't work when you "do that" (STIMERM WAIT), then don't "do that". :>If you want to be able to "communicate" then you wait on multiple ECBs and do not use STIMERM WAIT, but use STIMERM with an exit that posts

Re: RACF, the FACILITY class, and z/XDC

2023-11-14 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
Since everyone already answered, here is my answer :-) 1. You can choose your own class. Advantages: You choose max. profile length, etc. Naming conventions is completely up to you, that means no interference with other products/profiles, no reserved names/prefixes. Disadvantage: Some people

Re: ATTACHX/STIMERM WAIT=YES

2023-11-14 Thread Peter Relson
As was alluded to, if it doesn't work when you "do that" (STIMERM WAIT), then don't "do that". If you want to be able to "communicate" then you wait on multiple ECBs and do not use STIMERM WAIT, but use STIMERM with an exit that posts one of the ECBs. The "communication" can be by posting one

Re: RACF, the FACILITY class, and z/XDC

2023-11-14 Thread Ituriel do Neto
David, Why don't you give the option to select the RACF class to the customer? You can give the instructions to create a new class in CDT or instruct them to use the XFACILIT class. Best Regards Ituriel do Nascimento Neto z/OS System Programmer Em segunda-feira, 13 de novembro de 2023

Re: ATTACHX/STIMERM WAIT=YES

2023-11-14 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:37:15 -0600 Paul Schuster wrote: :>How to handle this situation: task ‘A’ attaches a subtask, task ‘B’. :>The ‘B’ task issues a STIMERM WAIT=YES :>Task ‘A’ terminates, but gets the A03 abend since task ‘B’ still active. :>How can task ‘A’ communicate to the subtask ‘B’

Re: ATTACHX/STIMERM WAIT=YES

2023-11-14 Thread Rob Scott
If the OP would like to see some example source for this sort of thing, I included simple task and timer interactions in the "Example Cross-Memory Server" code I wrote for Share Dallas. You can download the code from : https://github.com/rscott-rocket/mxe Rob Scott Rocket Software