Re: What is IEANTRTR in Authorized Assembler Services Reference?

On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 00:11:28 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote: >I was looking to see if this was supported in 2.4, but didn't find it IBM guarantees upward compatibility but not backward. You must always assemble your product with your lowest supported libraries (e.g. 2.4 AMACLIB, AMODGEN,

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

VSE JCL. First time I had to use it...Well all the DLBLS before the EXEC. Actually more logical. The O/S? We could run a production CICS region on a 1 MIP machine. That's tight. (and a Meg of main). On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:29 AM Wayne Bickerdike wrote: > If there are embedded ./ IEBUPDTE in

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

If there are embedded ./ IEBUPDTE in the JCL, I write a .# ADD card as the header and then use my PUTPDS REXX code. The odds of a .# ADD appearing I guesstimate as nil. Yes, it's annoying but really, who cares? On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:37 AM Paul Gilmartin <

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

JES2 also has /* commands, such as: /*JOBPARM /*MESSAGE /*NETACCT /*NOTIFY /*OUTPUT /*PRIORITY /*ROUTE etc. So I would imagine those look like comments to you. MVS has JCL so does VSE. Each of them has a "spooler" system (JES2|JES3 for MVS and POWER for DOS type systems last I did a

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 19:47:38 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: >JES3 is not retarded. > I may have judged hastily from such as that the OUTPUT JCL statement came to JES2 before JES3. You could pay extra to not get the feature. >JES3 has this: >//*DATASET parameters. > >//*ENDDATASET > Those

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

JES3 is not retarded. JES3 has this: //*DATASET parameters. //*ENDDATASET This is what the z/OS MVS JCL REF has for the parameters: //*DATASET DDNAME=ddname[,parameter]... The parameters are:     MODE= {E}           {C}     J= {YES}    {NO }     CLASS= {NO }    {MSGCLASS}

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:06:01 +, Lennie Bradshaw wrote: >Paul Gilmartin said, >>> And no DLM is safe to use with instream XMIT output. << > >True. However, for any given stream there is ahigh likelihood of finding a 2 >char symbols that would work for that stream. I wrote a program to scan

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 at 14:06, Lennie Bradshaw wrote: > Paul Gilmartin said, > >> And no DLM is safe to use with instream XMIT output. << > > True. However, for any given stream there is ahigh likelihood of finding a > 2 char symbols that would work for that stream. I wrote a program to scan >

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

Paul Gilmartin said, >> And no DLM is safe to use with instream XMIT output. << True. However, for any given stream there is ahigh likelihood of finding a 2 char symbols that would work for that stream. I wrote a program to scan files to find a suitable delimiter string to use some years back.

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 11:48:02 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: >In a JES2 environment, DLM= can be up to and including 8 >characters (JES3 is limited to 2, not sure of JES3+). > Why is JES3 so retarded? Useful features tend to be added to JES2 earlier than JES3. >In that case, what odds are there of

Re: IBM key management products

Charles wrote: >When I was doing security presentations as part of my job one of the >"controversies" I ran into was that the supposed percentage of insider >attacks is all over the place. I used to see 85% in one set of >statistics and nearly zero in others. I have no independent knowledge. My

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

In a JES2 environment, DLM= can be up to and including 8 characters (JES3 is limited to 2, not sure of JES3+). In that case, what odds are there of coming up with a safe string? Just asking. Steve Thompson On 4/14/2024 9:04 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 20:01:50 -0500, Mike

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:35:00 -0400, David Spiegel wrote: >Hi Gil, >Please see PDSLOAD (CBT File 093). > This appears to be a companion to OFFLOAD: which says: ... If the program detects IEBUPDTE control cards in the member of

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

Hi Gil, Please see PDSLOAD (CBT File 093). Regards, David On 2024-04-14 09:04, Paul Gilmartin wrote: On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 20:01:50 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote: You can set it up for a //SYSIN DD DATA,DLM='??' and add the '??' Card at the end. That's not enough. If the input PDS contains a

Re: ./ ADD - which utility?

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 20:01:50 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote: >You can set it up for a //SYSIN DD DATA,DLM='??' and add the >'??' >Card at the end. > That's not enough. If the input PDS contains a member with a line beginning with "./", which

Re: IBM key management products

W dniu 12.04.2024 o 22:57, Tony Harminc pisze: On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 12:22, Jousma, David < 01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: [...] I personally am still having a hard time wrapping my head around the “real benefit” of dataset encryption. Everyone who has READ or more

Re: Sv: ./ ADD - which utility?

Thanks, I found the JCL and run the jobs successfully. (I had several large files with ./ ADD and the data stacked after, it was one file per PDS. Had I thought I really would need them I had made smaller files and the JCL separate.)