Re: dataset list ISPF =3.4 batch job

2020-09-24 Thread Joe Monk
Sure ... Run this using ISPF in batch. To execute it for a different HLQ than your userid: TSO %clstname L(HLQ) PROC 0 L() G(SAVE) /* */ /* Quick ISPF save of data set names. This is much quicker */ /* than using OPT 3.4, because it does not do an obtain */ /* for each data set in the list

Re: Determining program name/number of paramaters from called COBOL program

2020-09-22 Thread Joe Monk
Well, here is the answer to at least part of the puzzle, if not all... "You can find the name of the calling programs from a COBOL V5 or V6 program at run time by using the LE service CEETBCK. For more information, see the z/OS® Language Environment® Vendor Interfaces."

Re: Determining program name/number of paramaters from called COBOL program

2020-09-22 Thread Joe Monk
em out, ... > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf > of Joe Monk > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 4:40 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >

Re: Determining program name/number of paramaters from called COBOL program

2020-09-22 Thread Joe Monk
s just an STM (24 bit) or > similar instructions. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf > of Joe Monk > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2

Re: Determining program name/number of paramaters from called COBOL program

2020-09-22 Thread Joe Monk
question is what special cases does the OP need to > handle. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf > of Joe Monk > Sent: Tuesday, September 22

Re: Determining program name/number of paramaters from called COBOL program

2020-09-22 Thread Joe Monk
If it's using standard OS linkage, he could use an assembler routine to do a traceback and get some of the items. The problem will come in if passed by value instead of by reference... Joe On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 2:58 PM Seymour J Metz wrote: > I doubt that it's possible in general, certain

Re: Determining program name/number of paramaters from called COBOL program

2020-09-22 Thread Joe Monk
Language Environment or non-LE? Joe On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 2:24 PM Chris Cantrell < chris.cantr...@palmettogba.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am hoping someone out there can help me with this 'opportunity'. > > In a Z/OS enterprise COBOL environment, I want to be able to retrieve the > calling

Re: Searching MLPA module

2020-09-21 Thread Joe Monk
onrefreshable code there, > but it is not always read only. Unlike PLPA, it is subject to page out. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > ________ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf &

Re: Searching MLPA module

2020-09-18 Thread Joe Monk
A is key zero and it's bad form to put nonrefreshable code there, > but it is not always read only. Unlike PLPA, it is subject to page out. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > > From: IBM Mainfra

Re: Searching MLPA module

2020-09-18 Thread Joe Monk
Thats incorrect. MLPA is read only. Joe On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 9:42 AM Itschak Mugzach < 0305158ad67d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > MLPA is in CSA and is modifiable while lpa is read only. > > בתאריך יום ו׳, 18 בספט׳ 2020, 17:17, מאת Peter ‏: > > > Apology for being ingorant ..

Re: SMPe ptfs download to USS

2020-09-17 Thread Joe Monk
No, its because the process uses java... Joe On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 7:57 AM kekronbekron < 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > I could be *completely* wrong .. so ... will wait for the list to correct > me. > Think this could be because TCP/IP is built 'in' USS, and

Re: z14 ZR1 CE LR LSYSTEM not found

2020-09-14 Thread Joe Monk
Jennifer, Have you seen these? https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ieaf100/ieaf10071.htm Joe On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 7:05 AM Jennifer McCumber < 0331f2b9a863-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Joe > > We are at 2.3 > >

Re: z14 ZR1 CE LR LSYSTEM not found

2020-09-13 Thread Joe Monk
What version of z/os? Joe On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 11:05 PM Jennifer McCumber < 0331f2b9a863-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Hi > > The CSYSTEM and LSYSTEM is an actual status via the service element while > looking at the channel problem determination of the VCHPD. > > The weird

Re: z14 ZR1 CE LR LSYSTEM not found

2020-09-11 Thread Joe Monk
You might check the fiber path between the buildings. I think the link budget on a CE LR is only 7db, so if you have some lossy fiber pairs and/or patches you might be losing too much light. Reference: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/sites/default/files/inline-files/536468_GA23-0367-13.pdf. -

Re: Architectural Level Sets

2020-09-09 Thread Joe Monk
OS/360 always runs in BC mode. MVS 3.8J and earlier IPL in BC mode and then change the PSW to EC mode. Joe On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 4:47 PM Seymour J Metz wrote: > In XA mode the problem is the SIO instruction. DOS.360, OS/360, OS/VS, > etc. don't support SSCH. Does OS/360 need BC when you

Re: Architectural Level Sets

2020-09-09 Thread Joe Monk
According to this guide, the 3090 could still start in BC mode when in 370 mode. See page 7-6. http://vtda.org/docs/computing/IBM/Mainframe/Hardware/System/SA22-7121-6_3090ProcComplexFunctionalCharacteristics.pdf Joe On Wed, Sep 9, 2020, 16:07 Lennie Bradshaw <

Re: [OT] Rabies [Was: Ransoming a mainframe disk farm]

2020-09-08 Thread Joe Monk
It is an interesting note that the rabies protocol is post-exposure. You will get post-exposure treatments on Days 0, 3, 7, and 14. The treatment on day 0 consists of a globulin shot as well as the vaccine. The other three are vaccine only. Joe On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:46 AM Robert Prins

Re: Ransoming a mainframe disk farm

2020-09-07 Thread Joe Monk
I will tell you that when it happened to my client, the "ransom" was $1million. It was less expensive to lose a days work. in restoring from backups. Joe On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:53 PM Charles Mills wrote: > > It should be a moral decision to *never* pay any ransom, no matter what > the cost

Re: Ransoming a mainframe disk farm

2020-09-07 Thread Joe Monk
Let me tell you why it is not such a hypothetical problem... As we all know, Microsoft now allows under Windows for Linux, Windows access to Linux datastores. So, imagine I have a mainframe data store mounted as a Linux FS on a Windows box running Windows for Linux. Now, the windows box gets

Re: PL/I integer arithmetic

2020-09-07 Thread Joe Monk
/GC33-0009-3_OS_PLI_Language_Reference_Jul74.pdf Joe On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 8:43 AM Robin Vowels wrote: > You think that I am not looking at IBM's PL/I LRM? > > On 2020-09-07 23:25, Joe Monk wrote: > > The answer is here: > > > > > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter

Re: PL/I integers (was: Constant Identifiers)

2020-09-07 Thread Joe Monk
"DECLARE (I, J) FIXED DECIMAL (15); I = 4; J = 3; PUT ((I/J*J));" Well, just doing the math, that should give an answer of 4. 4/3 * 3/1 = 4/1 = 4 ... Joe On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 9:15 AM Seymour J Metz wrote: > Did you read what I wrote? The code you wrote has nothing to do with the >

Re: PL/I integer arithmetic

2020-09-07 Thread Joe Monk
t I wrote is correct for such. > See Table 15 top entry, for ANS rules for division; > Table 16 top entry, for IBM rules. > > On 2020-09-07 22:19, Joe Monk wrote: > > Actually it does... > > > > Under the IBM suboption: > > > > > >- Nonz

Re: Constant Identifiers

2020-09-07 Thread Joe Monk
/knowledgecenter/SSZHNR_2.0.0/com.ibm.ent.pl1.zos.doc/pg/rules.html Joe On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 12:23 AM Robin Vowels wrote: > On 2020-09-07 13:05, Joe Monk wrote: > > "No it isn't. 4/3 yields 1.33... to 15 digits, > > and is of precision (15,14)" > > > > Depend

Re: Constant Identifiers

2020-09-07 Thread Joe Monk
Fortran mindset. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf > of Joe Monk > Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2020 7:35 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU &

Re: Constant Identifiers

2020-09-06 Thread Joe Monk
4 PM Robin Vowels wrote: > On 2020-09-07 09:35, Joe Monk wrote: > > "PL/I doesn't have integers." > > > > Sorry Shmuel, youre incorrect. > > > > FIXED BINARY (15,0) is a 2 byte integer and FIXED BINARY (31,0) is a 4 > > byte > > integer. >

Re: Constant Identifiers

2020-09-06 Thread Joe Monk
"PL/I doesn't have integers." Sorry Shmuel, youre incorrect. FIXED BINARY (15,0) is a 2 byte integer and FIXED BINARY (31,0) is a 4 byte integer. "The ratiio 4/3 is FIXED BIN," No, its FIXED DECIMAL (1,0)... Joe On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 2:33 PM Seymour J Metz wrote: > PL/I doesn't have

Re: Ransoming a mainframe disk farm

2020-09-04 Thread Joe Monk
fornia Edison Company > Electric Dragon Team Paddler > SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager > 323-715-0595 Mobile > 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW > robin...@sce.com > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Joe Monk > Sent: Friday, Septem

Re: Ransoming a mainframe disk farm

2020-09-04 Thread Joe Monk
Skip, I will tell you what saved one of my customers. When they use a VTL, they replicated that VTL to another site. So, when some files got encrypted via ransomware, they were able to quickly replicate the files back and re-boot. Joe On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:51 PM Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: >

Re: Multiple FTP Servers

2020-09-04 Thread Joe Monk
Generally, for passive FTP/s, the connection is negotiated on port 21 and then redirected to a higher port. Joe On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 10:50 AM Roberto Halais wrote: > Listers: > > We are converting all our file transfer jobs from FTP to FTPS. > Our security people insist we do not use port

Re: Architectural Level Sets

2020-09-02 Thread Joe Monk
Page 7-31 says the only condition for XA is the "move-inverse facility" has to be installed... http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/princOps/SA22-7085-1_370-XA_Principles_of_Operation_Jan87.pdf Joe On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:10 AM Seymour J Metz wrote: > Strange! The XA PoOps shows MVCIN as

Re: Architectural Level Sets

2020-09-01 Thread Joe Monk
"MVS didn't use 2KiB pages," Yes, MVS 3.8J does use 2KB pages. Joe On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 7:20 PM Seymour J Metz wrote: > MVS didn't use 2KiB pages, so I never paid any attention to whether the > 4341 or 3081 had them, but MVS/XA required DAS. Access registers came > later, on the 3090, and

Re: Architectural Level Sets

2020-09-01 Thread Joe Monk
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf > of Joe Monk > Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 5:55 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Architectural Level Sets > > 370 supported DAS (

Re: Architectural Level Sets

2020-09-01 Thread Joe Monk
370 supported DAS (the code is in MVS3.8J). 43XX running MVS supported DAS also. 4381 could have up to 64M of main storage... Joe On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:26 PM Mike Schwab wrote: > Well, XA+ machines only supported 4K pages / 1M segments and not 2K > pages / 64K segments. Then DAS and

Re: Dovetail/Kirk Wolf?

2020-09-01 Thread Joe Monk
Dave, I would encourage you to check whether websockets are enabled on the T:Z product. If not, nothing to worry about, and you can report the issue to your security team as mitigated. Joe On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 6:00 AM Jousma, David < 01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: >

Re: Mainframe Multi factor authentication possibilities

2020-08-25 Thread Joe Monk
I dont understand how this is supposed to work. 2FA is for ONE user. If you have many users using one common userid, the system should invalidate any other user logged on with that. same userid and a different 2FA. Joe On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:42 AM Paul Gilmartin <

Re: PF key - one PF key - not responding

2020-08-24 Thread Joe Monk
When youre in EDIT mode, try PFSHOW on the command line. See what it says. Joe On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:22 PM Bob Bridges wrote: > While replying to some of the ideas you folks sent me I thought to try > another one: I said works in Outlook, but I forgot to > distinguish: It's working in

Re: DFSORT confusion.

2020-08-20 Thread Joe Monk
, Aug 20, 2020 at 7:05 AM John McKown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 7:03 AM Joe Monk wrote: > > > What happens if you code the include like this? > > > > OUTFIL INCLUDE=(19,1,CH,EQ,C'ABCDEFGHIJKLNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789') > > > > Hum, I don't know why that

Re: DFSORT confusion.

2020-08-20 Thread Joe Monk
What happens if you code the include like this? OUTFIL INCLUDE=(19,1,CH,EQ,C'ABCDEFGHIJKLNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789') Joe On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:27 AM John McKown wrote: > This is on z/OS 1.12 (sorry). A programmer has run two DFSORT jobs with > slightly different control statements which

Re: Name those boxes

2020-08-18 Thread Joe Monk
The console is an IBM 1415-2, hard to tell, but looks like it is for a 7010 CPU system. http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/IBM-ProdAnn/7010.pdf Joe On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:51 PM Ken Smith wrote: > The phone is a Western Electric model 500 > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_500_telephone >

Re: Remember the 9370?

2020-08-12 Thread Joe Monk
And then there were also the micro-channel 9370s... 9371-1xx. Ran VM and DOS/VSE. Joe On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:20 AM Martin Packer wrote: > In that sense it was rather like the AS/400 - and from the same era. > > Before the - nicer to my eyes - black machine aesthetic kicked in. > > Cheers,

Re: EC6 ABEND with X'00FFCE54' in R15

2020-08-09 Thread Joe Monk
"I wonder what's so special about TSO?" TSO in batch or TSO Interactive? But either way, doesnt TSO normally spin off subtasks with an ATTACH/ATTACHX? Joe On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 11:01 AM Thomas David Rivers wrote: > Joe Monk wrote: > > >Umm... dont you maintain a table

Re: EC6 ABEND with X'00FFCE54' in R15

2020-08-09 Thread Joe Monk
Umm... dont you maintain a table of your pthreads? Like storing off their ids somewhere? If not maybe you should? Then you can have a routine in your exit that kills off the pthreads from the table using their id before you exit... Joe On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 6:14 AM Thomas David Rivers wrote:

Re: Multiprise 3000

2020-08-08 Thread Joe Monk
Did you look on ebay? Joe On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 6:10 AM W Mainframe < 01304632a58d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Guys,Any suggestion about a small storage unit for a Multiprise 3000 > (7060-P30)? I am just looking for internal ssa disks... But seems they are > hidden... :) >

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-07 Thread Joe Monk
Not a good idea to be hurling insults from a work account. Joe On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 4:25 AM R.S. wrote: > BBC > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland > > > > > > > > W dniu 07.08.2020 o 03:28, Seymour J Metz pisze: > > PKB > > > > > > -- > > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > >

Re: Edit Macro

2020-08-06 Thread Joe Monk
So, you would do it like this: ISPEXEC EDIT DSN(BLAHBLAH) MACRO(START) In START: ISREDIT MACRO ISREDIT EICUPDT 5 ISREDIT END The initial macro has to call the EICUPDT macro. Joe On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 6:48 PM Joe Monk wrote: > It is a REQUIREMENT that when you run ISREDIT in BA

Re: Edit Macro

2020-08-06 Thread Joe Monk
END suggestion. > > I did add that - but the process is not executing the macro. > > So that is not the problem. > > Thanks > > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Joe Monk > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2020 5:57 PM &g

Re: Edit Macro

2020-08-06 Thread Joe Monk
Well... The first thing youve got to do is fix your edit macro. When you run an edit macro in batch, it has to end with "ISREDIT END". So, you might have two different versions, one for batch and one for online. Second, when you run ISREDIT in batch, you have to use a macro to supply the input.

Re: OT: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-08-05 Thread Joe Monk
"Federal limits, state limits... This is something I don't understand." It is a concept called federalism. The state has certain powers, and the federal government has certain powers. Joe On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:16 AM R.S. wrote: > Federal limits, state limits... This is something I

Re: z/VM guest with old z/OS

2020-08-03 Thread Joe Monk
So what level of z/vm are you upgrading to? Joe On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:11 AM CarlosM Martinez wrote: > I am on a 2818 M02 (Z114) running Z/VM 5.4.0. service level 0902 (64 > bit) with Z/OS 01.13 moving over to a Z/15 soon, > > Carlos Martinez > SUNY Downstate > > -Original

Re: z/VM guest with old z/OS

2020-08-03 Thread Joe Monk
Jim, So has ESA/390 been eliminated from z/Architecture? Joe On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:16 PM Jim Mulder wrote: > There is no "might" about it. As shipped by IBM, nothing lower than > z/OS 1.12 will run on a z14 or z15. I don't know who you think "might" > know more about this particular

Re: z/VM guest with old z/OS

2020-08-01 Thread Joe Monk
Brian, You said: "> I don't know about z/VM 5.3, but running z/OS 1.10 under z/VM on a > z13 and z14 works (and probably also on a z15), so it's likely that > it will work on a z12." Jim said: "Prior to z/OS 1.12, z/OS IPL uses Dynamic Address Translation while still in ESA/390 mode. z14 and

Re: Started task stopping immediately. No error messages.

2020-07-27 Thread Joe Monk
IMHO, the clue to this is in his printout. PGM=FTPD,REGION=0M,TIME=NOLIMIT,PARM='POSIX(ON) ALL31(ON)/TRACE PORT 990' IEF043I Actions taken by SMFLIMxx parmlib policy for FTPSDFTPD Step MEMLIMIT set to ONOUDONT by policy - SMFLIM00 0002 So, it looks some exit is killing the task

Re: Keeping TSO users our of CICS

2020-07-27 Thread Joe Monk
You can get around the problem with an MPF exit to automatically REVOKE. Look at CBT 708. Joe On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 3:32 PM McCabe, Ron wrote: > Hello IBM Listers, > > Got an interesting problem that I would like to know how we can avoid. > Our Help Desk users TSO accounts have the SPECIAL

Re: Influence of IBSYS/IBJOB on OS/360

2020-07-26 Thread Joe Monk
I dont think you'll find such a thing. I always thought IBSYS/IBJOB were the predecessors of DOS/360, and DOS/360 was written as a temporary holdover to run on the 360 until OS was ready, because OS was completely new implementation of things on the new machine (i.e. a completely new OS). Joe

Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-23 Thread Joe Monk
"Lb Foot is not a measure of pressure" ... correct. It is a measure of torque. A pound-foot (lbf⋅*ft*) is a unit of torque (a pseudovector). One pound-foot is the torque created by one pound of force acting at a perpendicular distance of one foot from a pivot point. Conversely one pound-foot is

Re: DFSORT task (I hope)

2020-07-23 Thread Joe Monk
If you want to do it DFSORT, I think you'll have to use ICETOOL with the SPLICE option. Joe On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 3:11 AM R.S. wrote: > I have the following case: > > Large (thousands) list containing filenames, > filea10002 > fileb10041 > filec20043 > filed39093 > longfileabc > anotherfile

Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-22 Thread Joe Monk
termine whether a crime was motivated by > hate or prejudice? Answer: We need thought police. -from "See, I Told You > So" by Rush Limbaugh */ > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Joe Monk

Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-22 Thread Joe Monk
The measure of weight is a kgf. Kilogram force. It is a kilogram multiplied by 9.8 (gravity force). But in shorthand we say kilogram. On Wed, Jul 22, 2020, 15:36 Pommier, Rex wrote: > A kilogram may not technically be a weight, but if not the whole world, at > least a large percentage of the

Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-22 Thread Joe Monk
Centigrade? It always thought it's Celsius. :) Joe On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:16 AM Bob Bridges wrote: > Interesting; centigrade is the one system I use nowadays without having to > think much about it. It's so easy: 0s are cold, 10s are cool, 20s are > warm, 30s are hot. > > I get

Re: Using AN EAX value of PC Routineto index into the Authority Table

2020-07-19 Thread Joe Monk
dress Space (AS2) to the Accessing Address Space (AS1) ?" How does it know what address space is the accessing address space (AS1) before it is called by that address space? Joe On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 6:39 AM esst...@juno.com wrote: > -- Original Message ------ >

Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-19 Thread Joe Monk
u/~smetz3 > > > > ____ > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf > > of Joe Monk [joemon...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2020 10:41 PM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >

Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?

2020-07-18 Thread Joe Monk
"Historically, COBOL made the wrong choice when they codified COPY for INCLUDE and used MOVE." I respectfully disagree. COBOL's mother is FLOW-MATIC. MOVE was in FLOW-MATIC. Joe On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 6:52 PM Wayne Bickerdike wrote: > Bob, > > David didn't say there were languages that did

Re: Using AN EAX value of PC Routineto index into the Authority Table

2020-07-18 Thread Joe Monk
This is explained on page 113: "The example also shows the difference between cross memory data movement with a move to primary (MVCP) and a data movement performed through ARs and the MVC instruction. PGM1 uses the SSAR instruction to establish AS2 as the secondary address space, then it uses

Re: Copying Extended format datasets between partitions

2020-07-14 Thread Joe Monk
tp. > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland > > > > > > > W dniu 14.07.2020 o 15:26, Joe Monk pisze: > > Why not just dump them, FTP the dump file between the two partitions, > then > > restore the dump file? > > > > Joe > > > >

Re: Copying Extended format datasets between partitions

2020-07-14 Thread Joe Monk
Why not just dump them, FTP the dump file between the two partitions, then restore the dump file? Joe On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 8:11 AM R.S. wrote: > Well, that change the perspective. It's a pity you didn't mention it > before ;-) > In this case one step is better (faster) than two-step

Re: Storage & tape question

2020-07-13 Thread Joe Monk
to sue anybody for that damage. ;-) > > Note: this is far from discussion about disks and tapes. This is my last > message in this sub-thread. > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland > > > > > > W dniu 13.07.2020 o 16:21, Joe Monk pisze: > > "Regar

Re: Storage & tape question

2020-07-13 Thread Joe Monk
on of the pictures and send it using other method. > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland > > > > > > > W dniu 13.07.2020 o 13:25, Joe Monk pisze: > > My point is, once you rent that computer and put your stuff on it, it is > no > > longer "someone else's

Re: Storage & tape question

2020-07-13 Thread Joe Monk
have a beer to a dinner or you don't buy taxi car to get > to airport. However many companies still have their own truck fleet. > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland > > > > > > W dniu 09.07.2020 o 16:22, Joe Monk pisze: > > Im sure that Kim Dotcom w

Re: IBM 2828-G01

2020-07-10 Thread Joe Monk
z/OS 2.4 is supported... z/OS® V2R4 is supported on the following IBM Z® servers: - IBM® z15™ (z15) - IBM z14™ (z14) - IBM z14® ZR1 - IBM z13® (z13®) - IBM z13s®™ (z13s) - IBM zEnterprise® EC12 (zEC12) - IBM zEnterprise BC12 (zBC12)

Re: Storage & tape question

2020-07-09 Thread Joe Monk
Im sure that Kim Dotcom would love your legal theory... Joe On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:51 AM R.S. wrote: > Azure? Cloud? > There is no cloud. It is just someone else's computer. ;-) > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland > > > > > > > W dniu 08.07

Re: SuperWylbur Users

2020-07-08 Thread Joe Monk
"I certainly had no intention to demean Gerhard, with whom I corresponded on other email lists. A gentleman and an expert in multiple disciplines who freely shared his expertise. If he failed after intensive effort, I wouldn’t presume to be his better." Yes Gerhard was special. He and I had

Re: SuperWylbur Users

2020-07-08 Thread Joe Monk
or the rest in the context of the > malformed code. > > It isn't beyond belief that the CCSID of the original source was the 037 > variant of IBM EBCDIC, but that is only a guess based on the age of the > code. > > Peter > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe D

Re: SuperWylbur Users

2020-07-08 Thread Joe Monk
Or at least I for one do not understand. > > Charles > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Joe Monk > Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 3:22 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject

Re: SuperWylbur Users

2020-07-08 Thread Joe Monk
7 PM David Spiegel wrote: > Hi Joe, > Why is it useless? > > Thanks and regards, > David > > On 2020-07-08 16:25, Joe Monk wrote: > > Yep. And its useless. > > > > Joe > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 1:39 PM David Spiegel > > wrote: > > &

Re: SuperWylbur Users

2020-07-08 Thread Joe Monk
Yep. And its useless. Joe On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 1:39 PM David Spiegel wrote: > Hi Joe, > I GUNZIPd and UNTARd WYLBUR via CYGWIN on Windows 10 Pro. > > Regards, > David > > On 2020-07-08 14:25, Joe Monk wrote: > > Here is some info from a while back ... > >

Re: SuperWylbur Users

2020-07-08 Thread Joe Monk
ackets and > such? > > > >-Original Message- > >Fromf Joe Monk > >Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 4:13 AM > > > >Theres a big problem with the stanford distribution that makes it > unusable. > > > >Basically, when they did th

Re: Storage & tape question

2020-07-08 Thread Joe Monk
I do a backup to spinning storage, then a copy of that backup to Azure for long term. Joe On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:12 AM Seymour J Metz wrote: > I've always gone with dual* backups, with one copy off site. Remote > mirroring is a good option where policy permits, and even if retensioning > is

Re: Storage & tape question

2020-07-08 Thread Joe Monk
First off, STOP Second off, disaster recovery is a question of risk mitigation for a business. The business (NOT I.T.) must make the decision as to what level of risk mitigation they are willing to pay for. You can preach at them til their blue in the face, and it wont matter until

Re: SuperWylbur Users

2020-07-08 Thread Joe Monk
Theres a big problem with the stanford distribution that makes it unusable. Basically, when they did the ASCII<>EBCDIC translation, some characters got mistranslated. So, it will not assemble. Joe On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 2:35 AM Timothy Sipples wrote: > There's precedent. Stanford graciously

Re: Storage & tape question

2020-07-07 Thread Joe Monk
In Houston, Texas, a hurricane is VERY likely. Joe On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:27 AM Seymour J Metz wrote: > A terrorist attack is unlikely. > > An earthquake is unlikely. > > A tornado is unlikely. > > A flood is unlikely. > > ... > > The more unlikely risks there are, the greater the odds that

Re: Storage & tape question

2020-07-07 Thread Joe Monk
Most ORGs are abandoning RAID-5 in favor of better like RAID-6. Any DASD array should be engineered with two hot spares and call home service to the vendor for drive replacement. Joe On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:58 AM John McKown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:19 AM Jackson, Rob > wrote: > > >

Re: SuperWylbur Users

2020-07-07 Thread Joe Monk
Me too. Joe On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 6:56 AM John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote: > I've reached out to SSI and asked about this. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to

Re: Assembler question

2020-07-05 Thread Joe Monk
05 BLA-2 PIC S9(8) COMP. > > Do you truly wish to assert that BLA-2 is aligned? > > On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 17:45:37 -0500 Joe Monk wrote: > > :>"Subordinate items are not aligned" > :> > :>yeah, no. > :> > :>If an 01 is

Re: Assembler question

2020-07-05 Thread Joe Monk
oe On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:07 PM Binyamin Dissen wrote: > On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 11:31:55 -0500 Joe Monk wrote: > > :>Cobol has alignment too. You just dont see it. > > :>All storage is aligned. > > The opposite is true. > > Group (01/77) are aligned. > >

Re: Assembler question

2020-07-05 Thread Joe Monk
Cobol has alignment too. You just dont see it. All storage is aligned. Joe On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 10:24 AM Nguyen Dt wrote: > Thank you all for your inputs, > > I am over the problem now. > In fact what i tried to do is to Move some fields to my output fields and > then write it as a report.

Re: Assembler question

2020-07-04 Thread Joe Monk
So in REPORT07, you have: 0CL274. This will not reserve any storage, because the multiplier is zero. (7FE). In the next variable, you have XL2. This is hex, length 2. Notice the location counter is at exactly the same place at REPORT07. (7FE). In the next variable you have XL2 again. This is

Re: When did .net become obsolete? was Re: z/OS use of "legacy" programming languages

2020-07-02 Thread Joe Monk
.NET 3.5 includes all earlier versions. Current .NET is 4.8.x which include 4.6.2 and 4.7.2. Joe On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:39 AM Clark Morris wrote: > [Default] On 2 Jul 2020 02:13:34 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main > r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl (R.S.) wrote: > > >> snip > > > >BTW: As a

Re: z/OS use of "legacy" programming languages

2020-07-02 Thread Joe Monk
Honestly, this whole discussion is kind of pointless, no? z/os IBM/390 IBM/370 IBM/360 all share ... instruction set. While the newer models all have newer instructions, object code assembled on a 360 is just as valid today as it was in 1960. Joe On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 4:13 AM R.S. wrote: >

Re: Migrate z/OS DASD volumes from Mainframe to Hercules Environment

2020-07-01 Thread Joe Monk
ation. > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland > > > > > > > > W dniu 30.06.2020 o 15:32, Joe Monk pisze: > > Call from the IBM Lawyers in 3... 2... 1... > > > > Joe > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:35 AM Jasi Grewal wrote: >

Re: Migrate z/OS DASD volumes from Mainframe to Hercules Environment

2020-06-30 Thread Joe Monk
what model DASD? Joe On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:00 AM Jasi Grewal wrote: > Thank You Mike for response and am an IBM Retiree and continues to work > with IBMers. > I am requesting IBMers to verify the Licensing and the message we are > getting is that it cannot find PLPA dataset and yet the

Re: Migrate z/OS DASD volumes from Mainframe to Hercules Environment

2020-06-30 Thread Joe Monk
Call from the IBM Lawyers in 3... 2... 1... Joe On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:35 AM Jasi Grewal wrote: > Hi, > > I am sorry I am just learning Hercules Systems and trying to migrate one > of my z/OS DASD Systems from Mainframe to Hercules Environment. > I have z/VM running on Hercules but when I

Re: Use of BPXWUNIX and CP - a weekend quandary.

2020-06-27 Thread Joe Monk
Wooden > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Joe Monk > Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2020 10:26 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Use of BPXWUNIX and CP - a weekend quandary. > > What happens if you omit -v? > &g

Re: Use of BPXWUNIX and CP - a weekend quandary.

2020-06-27 Thread Joe Monk
What happens if you omit -v? Joe On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 10:13 AM Lionel B Dyck wrote: > I'm running a rexx script under the OMVS shell and have an anomaly that I > need help with. > > > > I'm copying a OMVS directory that contains a lot of files into a PDS where > each file results in a PDS

Re: New Mainframe Community

2020-06-26 Thread Joe Monk
In my humble opinion joe On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 1:44 PM McCabe, Ron wrote: > I know this is off topic but what does IMHO stand for? > > Thanks, > Ron McCabe > Manager of Mainframe/Midrange Systems > Mutual of Enumclaw > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On

Re: 3 phase power question for the gray hair group. :-)

2020-06-22 Thread Joe Monk
Well its pretty simple. Each phase has a 0 degree point for the rise and fall of the sine wave. You wire each phase to its corresponding 60 degree out connection on the relay coil. So, if the phases dont line up, you dont get a strong enough magnetic field to close the relay. Joe On Mon, Jun 22,

Re: CA-ACCUCHEK

2020-06-17 Thread Joe Monk
CA-ACCUCHEK was a file comparison utility similar to comparex. Joe On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:06 PM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hello list, > > Based on the subject line of my post, does anybody know anything about > something called CA-ACCUCHEK? I have a developer asking about it and I > know

Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question

2020-06-16 Thread Joe Monk
There is an APAR for 0C4 in JES2 when TYPRUN=COPY... https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA57427 Joe On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hello list, > > I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a > competing product. As part of our testing of

Re: COBOL Question

2020-06-09 Thread Joe Monk
"Easytrieve plus" You mean sleazytrieve plus? :) There was also DYL280 and QUIKJOB. Joe On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:55 PM Mike Schwab wrote: > 4GL - I've used Telon which takes a screen layout and database layout > and generates the cobol code and editing rules. ADR-Datacom had Ideal > which

Re: "Everyone wants to retire mainframes"

2020-06-09 Thread Joe Monk
What do you think about paved roads? Theyre something else, huh? Nice and smooth... Joe On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:41 AM Seymour J Metz wrote: > How long has your company been using electricity? Time to modernize. > > Yes, I know that you've replaced the wiring three times and have solar > power

Re: COBOL Question

2020-06-08 Thread Joe Monk
ptable as > well. In fact, if you try to "perform" a "terminal" exit procedure the > compiler will give you a warning that your "calling" procedure will never > reach its exit. > > ________ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Li

  1   2   3   >