Quoting my dearly departed mother, Is this the biggest problem in your life
today?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bill Godfrey
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 1:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FB
Not being sure if the original post required individual members, the output
of IEBPTPCH could be modified.
from :MEMBER NAME to ./ ADDetc etc
so as to provide input to IEBUPDTE. I'm not sure of how trailing blanks
will be treated.
I did something like this years ago, but in
No no, John is correct. Page 1 of the installation guide states: My, you are
handsome!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mitch
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 12:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Or in my case, EE, forever is July 1. (he he he)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 12:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FB to VB PDS
Tony's Basement
Geez Jim, you been hangin' around Metz too long. :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 1:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What exactly does SHRD tell me in the
Guys, I have a classic case of WHEN=GROUP processing.I have an input
file FB/80:
Header1..data-I-need-in-column 1
Detail1.data-I-need-in-column 10
Detail2.data-I-need-in-column 20
Detail3..data-I-need-in-column 30
Header2... data-I-need-in_column 1etc
: Tony's Basement Computer tbabo...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 01/23/2015 09:41 AM
Subject: Another df/sort objective.
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Guys, I have a classic case of WHEN=GROUP processing.I have
an input file FB/80
The entry for Congerville, IL is incorrect. A farmer called it in using the C
scale. I drove right by that morning and laughed at the radio.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, January
DVDU NOT RACF-DEFINED
The above was generated using the CICS CESN signon transaction.
From: Tony's Basement Computer tbabo...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: Enumerating User IDs (was: CANCEL TSO Logon?)
Back years ago I
Being old enough to remember the pre-Protected days, when this feature appeared
we implemented it into every user profile we could find that satisfied the
criteria. Zero pain, more uninterrupted sleep.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I once suggested to management that we secure our z/OS user profiles. At the
time they were used as EMAIL addresses as well. I explained the scenario of
rotating IDs as Mike suggested it could lead to a DoS exploitation.
Naturally the EMAIL people prevailed.sigh.
-Original
.a user without a TSO segment ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Boris Lenz
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 9:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CANCEL TSO Logon?
On Mon, January 5, 2015 16:29, Charles
DoS, revoke all the non-Special and non-Protected users.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 9:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CANCEL TSO Logon?
Agreed, and I even convinced my 2 buddies, the 71 year old heart surgeon and
the 70 year old pilot. I figured I'd change careers eventually, maybe I'll
drive the courtesy van at my local Cadillac dealer. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
This thread brings back a memory from back in the day when they actually
paid me to be a SYSPROG. IPOUPDTE was all we had so we added a step to load
the sacred member, do the changes, delete the member in a following step.
Annoying, like my new Keurig coffee machine.
-Original
Thanks for links, John. I'll check them both. There is another aspect to
vision impairment that most web based apps introduce their own deficiency, i.e.
contrast. We have some folks whose vision doesn't need enlargement or
magnification because that's not their challenge. Contrast is the
Years ago, I'm guessing maybe 10, I wanted to do exactly that, create a PDS or
PDSE, by writing a bunch of members, then in the next job step reset all the
stats, just to get record counts. Being too lazy to go 3.5 or S * G, I posted
this request to the list. Some kind REXXer sent in a reply,
I'm trying to develop a seemingly simple SPLICE operation where all the input
comes from a single dataset. I want to
combine several records types into 1 record containing the fields from each
input record type. For example I have an input file where various types can
appear in a
Since all the DCB stuff is there why even specify a model? I haven't for
decades.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Clark, David
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 12:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GDG
Likewise, I have shot myself in a lower extremity when creating/modifying a
logon proc. A once old timer advised while still in edit, submit it. JCL
errors will occur then as opposed to later.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
Years ago at our county fair I asked one of the 083 fortune tellers are you
sure that's 9 edge, face down? Blank stare was his reply.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014
I have a minor DF/SORT application that works on one LPAR and fails on
another. The leading zero appears to be the culprit.
PARSE=(%01=(ABSPOS=31,ENDBEFR=C'.',FIXLEN=8)), works cc=0,
but if I specify 08 (zero-eight) for FIXLEN
This brings back memories of a small zOS shop I worked at in the late 90s.
They routinely built user catalogs whose entire name was 8 characters or
less, and intentionally happened to match a high level qualifier(s). Their
reasoning for this practice was that they did not have to define aliases.
Holy Granola Ed, I had to do a double take. This post looked like a
Wheeler-mania. :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 2:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Gilmore, did Dale Carnegie ever punch you in the nose?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of John Gilmore
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 8:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: XR vs SR
Shane,
How is it that I
25 matches
Mail list logo
