T Development
> IBM Corporation
>
> IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
> 07/09/2020 02:21:03 PM:
>
>> From: Steve Smith
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Date: 07/09/2020 02:21 PM
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: IFG0EX0B to increase secondary allocation
>> S
Well, actually I have read that section, although some time ago. I am very
surprised to see that Richard Pinion's post was a direct quote from there!
Sorry for assuming it
So I still have the same question, I just don't hope much for an answer, as
it would presumably have to be answered by
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 07/09/2020 02:21 PM
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: IFG0EX0B to increase secondary allocation
> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>
> I don't follow. I understand the JFCNWRIT flag, as it's documented. I
> don't know why you would
That's what I got from Sri.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Smith
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 5:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IFG0EX0B to increase secondary allocation
[External Email. Exercise caution when clicking links
I don't follow. I understand the JFCNWRIT flag, as it's documented. I
don't know why you would set it in the first place if you don't have a good
reason for it. But where did this undocumented flag that you're now
setting come from and how does it relate to JFCNWRIT?
sas
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020
I'd like to take this opportunity to thank Sri Kolusu, of IBM, for taking the
time
to help with the open exit IFG0EX0B, in regards to IEBGENER/ICEGENER and
DF/SORT.
He has spent the last few days researching and testing.
He came up with a solution, and the exit is now working with
