Re: RFE 145094: No warning on "conflicting" use of "SEQ" keyword in SuperC

2020-09-08 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:03:28 +, Robert Prins wrote:

>https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=145094
>
>You use SuperC from the ISPF menu, see that there are no differences, copy the
>generated JCL into a job, and suddenly there are differences, because you 
>forgot
>to zap the "SEQ" process option. It does no harm, but results in a condition
>code 4 for non FB(80)VB(255) datasets.
>
>Make it just an informational message!
> 
I'd say, rather that this should be an SR.  The generated JCL should
have the same behavior as the foreground compare.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


RFE 145094: No warning on "conflicting" use of "SEQ" keyword in SuperC

2020-09-08 Thread Robert Prins

https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=145094

You use SuperC from the ISPF menu, see that there are no differences, copy the 
generated JCL into a job, and suddenly there are differences, because you forgot 
to zap the "SEQ" process option. It does no harm, but results in a condition 
code 4 for non FB(80)VB(255) datasets.


Make it just an informational message!

Robert
--
Robert AH Prins
robert.ah.prins(a)gmail.com
The hitchhiking grandfather - https://prino.neocities.org/indez.html
Some REXX code for use on z/OS - https://prino.neocities.org/zOS/zOS-Tools.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN