Thanks to you all for your thoughts and good advice so far!*
*
Horst,
*Re. you saying:
(IMHO the term overhead is misleading, 'management time' would be more
accurate).*
What do you mean by this?
Simply stated: overhead is all wat is NOT 'captured' on some application
or sw component.
LPAR
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ''MVS overhead'' (as indicated by OMEGAMON)
Thanks to you all for your thoughts and good advice so far!*
*
Horst,
*Re. you saying:
(IMHO the term overhead is misleading, 'management time' would be more
accurate).*
What do you mean by this?
Simply stated
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jan Vanbrabant
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 4:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ''MVS overhead'' (as indicated by OMEGAMON)
Hi,
A customer of mine is HiperDispatch with defined capacity (hence
possible softcapping based
Jan,
it appears the monitor is trying to tell you that you have a low capture
ratio. Searching for that term should give you a good understanding of what
the message really means, and in a lot of good advice, e.g. in the Effective
zSeries Performance Monitoring Using Resource Measurement
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jan Vanbrabant
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 3:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ''MVS overhead'' (as indicated by OMEGAMON)
Hi Dave co-listers,
1°
Is OMEGAMON capable
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 22:28:16 +0100, Jan Vanbrabant wrote:
This system has bad P/Is, for example one Service Class has a P/I=18.5
while there are no bottlenecks at all with the resources, while being idle
for 96,9%.
I would take this as a clue. When a service class has goals that are too
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jan Vanbrabant
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 4:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ''MVS overhead'' (as indicated by OMEGAMON)
Hi,
A customer of mine is HiperDispatch
