And you can be part of it for free! :)
https://quantumexperience.ng.bluemix.net/qx/
On 3/21/2019 6:14 AM, Mark Regan wrote:
https://www.networkworld.com/article/3373550/quantum-computing-will-break-your-encryption-in-a-few-years.html
https://tinyurl.com/y4ddvsm2
--
Jack J. Woehr
https://www.networkworld.com/article/3373550/quantum-computing-will-break-your-e
ncryption-in-a-few-years.html
or
https://tinyurl.com/y4ddvsm2
Regards,
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1 USNR-Retired, 1969-1991
Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/12/13/ibm_australia_mistakes/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Paul Gilmartin said, in part:
>A lot of that I'd do with SELECT and CALL. But partly I'm being compulsive
>about
>avoiding SIGNAL. And sometimes I force a terminal condition (such as NOVALUE)
>to get the procedure call trace.
(Continuing this Socratically, not really trying to convince anyone,
On 2017-08-05, at 08:30, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> ...
> But isn't that merely:
>
>do_initialization
>if ( condition1 & condition2 & condition3 & condition4 ) {
>do_processing; }
>do_housekeeping
>
Testing whether the eMail interface produces HTML less mangled than
the web
another solution,
>> involving a "dummy loop" and break:
>>
>> void do_something (...)
>>
>> {
>> do_initialization ();
>> do
>> {
>> /* one time dummy loop */
>>
>> if (! condition1)
>> break;
>&g
processing
end;
do_housekeeping
end;
This looks awful because of the indentation.
For example, if implementing this logic in C, I could use goto,
of course. If I don't want to use goto, there is another solution,
involving a "dummy loop" and break:
void do_something (...)
{
;
This looks awful because of the indentation.
For example, if implementing this logic in C, I could use goto,
of course. If I don't want to use goto, there is another solution,
involving a "dummy loop" and break:
void do_something (...)
{
do_initialization ();
do
{
/* one
solution,
involving a "dummy loop" and break:
void do_something (...)
{
do_initialization ();
do
{
/* one time dummy loop */
if (! condition1)
break;
/* don't continue */
if (! condition2)
break;
/* don't continue */
if (! condition3)
On 5/08/2017 7:19 AM, Smith III, Phil (HPE Data Security (Voltage)) wrote:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Rexx has no GOTO. "break" is LEAVE [control-variable] (and "continue is
ITERATE [control-variable]). I never use Rexx SIGNAL other than to force
an error; its side effec
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 23:19:13 +, Smith III, Phil (HPE Data Security
(Voltage)) wrote:
>Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>Rexx has no GOTO. "break" is LEAVE [control-variable] (and "continue is
>>ITERATE [control-variable]). I never use Rexx SIGNAL other than to forc
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>Rexx has no GOTO. "break" is LEAVE [control-variable] (and "continue is
>ITERATE [control-variable]). I never use Rexx SIGNAL other than to force
>an error; its side effects are dreadful.
By "to force an error", do you mean "to
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 13:01:27 -0500, Steve Beaver wrote:
>Charles. PL/1 and REXX are about the same The break would be a goto
>
Rexx has no GOTO. "break" is LEAVE [control-variable] (and "continue is
ITERATE [control-variable]). I never use Rexx SIGNAL other than to for
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: Break a dataset into new record boundaries?
In 1358352865.70255.yahoomail...@web120503.mail.ne1.yahoo.com, on
01/16/2013
at 08:14 AM, Ze'ev Atlas zatl...@yahoo.com said:
Don't misunderstand me, I love Rexx
In 1358352865.70255.yahoomail...@web120503.mail.ne1.yahoo.com, on
01/16/2013
at 08:14 AM, Ze'ev Atlas zatl...@yahoo.com said:
Don't misunderstand me, I love Rexx... just would want it to have
better IO and regular expressions (in z/OS - on other platforms
Rexx already has this capability,
In 1358346823.60155.yahoomail...@web120503.mail.ne1.yahoo.com, on
01/16/2013
at 06:33 AM, Ze'ev Atlas zatl...@yahoo.com said:
I would do Perl too, but what if you are limited to Rexx and EXECIO
Then I'd grit my teeth and use parse to split the data. In either case
the real problem is what
Da: Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
A: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Inviato: Martedì 15 Gennaio 2013 18:04
Oggetto: Break a dataset into new record boundaries?
I've got a dataset that has been mangled through some misguided efforts such
that original record boundaries have been lost. It used
I would do Perl too, but what if you are limited to Rexx and EXECIO
Ze'ev Atlas
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+...@patriot.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: Break a dataset into new record
RETURN
Da: Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
A: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Inviato: Mercoledì 16 Gennaio 2013 16:53
Oggetto: Re: Break a dataset into new record boundaries?
Charles
I've got a dataset that has been mangled through some misguided efforts such
that original record boundaries have been lost. It used to be RECFM=V and
now it is RECFM=F
As luck would have it, every original record begins with the same hex value.
Can anyone suggest a simple tool -- z/OS, USS, or
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:04:30 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
I've got a dataset that has been mangled through some misguided efforts such
that original record boundaries have been lost. It used to be RECFM=V and
now it is RECFM=F
Surely not FTP!?
As luck would have it, every original record begins
: charl...@mcn.org
Subject: Break a dataset into new record boundaries?
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
I've got a dataset that has been mangled through some misguided efforts such
that original record boundaries have been lost. It used to be RECFM=V and
now it is RECFM=F
As luck would have
I've got a dataset that has been mangled through some misguided efforts such
that original record boundaries have been lost. It used to be RECFM=V and now
it is RECFM=F
As luck would have it, every original record begins with the same hex value.
Can anyone suggest a simple tool -- z/OS, USS, or
I know an easy way to do it in a z/OS UNIX file, using sed. The only
restriction is that it won't work if the file has an embedded x'15'
(z/OS UNIX new line). On a z/OS UNIX shell prompt (such as TSO OMVS,
or ssh or telnet). If the value at the start of the record is not a
printable character, you
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:21:37 -0600, Roberts, John J wrote:
If binary, I would just write a one-off ASM program to recover the original
records. It's probably a 30 minute task, easier than trying to learn anything
new.
For me and for some others, that _is_ trying to learn something new.
--
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:04:30 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
I've got a dataset that has been mangled through some misguided efforts such
that original record boundaries have been lost. It used to be RECFM=V and
now it is RECFM=F
As luck would have it, every original record begins with the same hex
record), and then either hit REFIND or a PF key that invoked a macro that split
the record at that point. Easier to debug than the Rexx program, and no false
splits to repair. I will still have to re-join the records that currently break
erroneously at the FB boundaries. Whoever it was, thanks
Doesn't TR just do a one-for-one translation of bytes? I.e. I don't
think you can use it to insert, as your OOPS indicated. Your tr
translates all \??? to \025 and all \025 to \???. I don't think this
is what is desired.
We could merge your answer with mine similar to:
cp -B //'ZOS.DSN'
Charles,
You can use RESIZE operator to break a large record into small records. I
assumed that each record starts with X'5B' ($) and each record has a max
length of 200 bytes and you have a max of 10 records in a single large FB
record.
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL
//TOOLMSG DD SYSOUT
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:04:30 -0800, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
I've got a dataset that has been mangled through some misguided efforts such
that original record boundaries have been lost. It used to be RECFM=V and
now it is RECFM=F
You did not say how it was mangled, and that can be
another crisis on my plate but I may give this a try. Thanks
again,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Sri h Kolusu
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Break a dataset
:
From: Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date: 01/15/2013 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: Break a dataset into new record boundaries?
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sri -
Thanks! That will do it, assuming I do have ICETOOL. I will have
wrote:
Charles,
You can use RESIZE operator to break a large record into small records. I
assumed that each record starts with X'5B' ($) and each record has a max
length of 200 bytes and you have a max of 10 records in a single large FB
record.
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL
//TOOLMSG DD SYSOUT
snip
I think I just need a PF-key-invocable macro that would split a
record at the cursor position, putting the character under the
cursor into the latter record.
/snip
You don't need an edit macro for that one. Just edit the dataset, enter the
KEYS command and set the PF key of your
, January 15, 2013 11:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Break a dataset into new record boundaries?
snip
I think I just need a PF-key-invocable macro that would split a
record at the cursor position, putting the character under the cursor
into the latter record.
/snip
You don't
...@mcn.org
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:04:14
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Break a dataset into new record boundaries?
Cool idea but
1
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Break a dataset into new record boundaries?
1. Shouldn't happen if you hit enter right away. They're just lines for you to
insert text, if wanted.
2. The file has to have variable length records
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Break a dataset into new record boundaries?
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:16:55 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
Yeah, it seems to be working. Not sure yet. I think perhaps the apparent
blanks
as expected.
Repeat as necessary.
Thanks all!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Break a dataset into new record
that split the record at
that point. Easier to debug than the Rexx program, and no false
splits to repair. I will still have to re-join the records that
currently break erroneously at the FB boundaries. Whoever it was,
thanks for the TF suggestion -- that should work.
I confess I have
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Break a dataset into new record boundaries?
Charles:
If all the records are V then why not just zap the dscb? then user iebgener?
If the records are mixed (F VB) then use any of the suggestions
41 matches
Mail list logo
