Re: "first previous"?

2018-12-10 Thread Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: "first previous"? > > I believe that "first previous" is equivalent to the relative -1 > generation. > > Linda > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 1, 2018, at 5:38 PM, retired mainframer mainfra...@q.com>

Re: "first previous"?

2018-12-07 Thread Linda
I believe that "first previous" is equivalent to the relative -1 generation. Linda Sent from my iPhone On Dec 1, 2018, at 5:38 PM, retired mainframer wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On >> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin &g

Re: "first previous"?

2018-12-01 Thread retired mainframer
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2018 12:13 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: "first previous"? > > From Program Management UG and Ref: > >

Re: "first previous"?

2018-12-01 Thread Paul Gilmartin
018 at 3:13 PM Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >> From Program Management UG and Ref: >> >> A SYMPATH specification applies to all SYMLINK specifications that >> precede it, >> back to the first previous SYMPATH. >> >> The word "previous" se

Re: "first previous"?

2018-12-01 Thread zMan
that > precede it, > back to the first previous SYMPATH. > > The word "previous" seems superfluous here. I wonder whether it means > "very first SYMPATH" or "nearest previous SYMPATH? > > -- gil > >

"first previous"?

2018-12-01 Thread Paul Gilmartin
From Program Management UG and Ref: A SYMPATH specification applies to all SYMLINK specifications that precede it, back to the first previous SYMPATH. The word "previous" seems superfluous here. I wonder whether it means "very first SYMPATH" or "nearest