There are lots of things that breaks pipelines - and so recovery is a 
necessary thing to think about and build in.

I guess the difference between Pipes and pipes :-) is one of granularity. 
A (CMS-style) pipeline is probably one you're more willing to restart in 
its entirety.

Cheers, Martin

Martin Packer

WW z/OS Performance, Capacity and Architecture, IBM Technology Sales

+44-7802-245-584

email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com

Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker

Blog: https://mainframeperformancetopics.com

Mainframe, Performance, Topics Podcast Series (With Marna Walle): 
https://anchor.fm/marna-walle

Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA



From:   "Timothy Sipples" <sipp...@sg.ibm.com>
To:     IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date:   23/09/2021 05:27
Subject:        [IBM External] The Business Case for Pipes in the z/OS 
Base (was: Re: REXX - Interpret or Value - Which is better?)
Sent by:        "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>



I misplaced the original post, but somewhere in this thread someone 
commented that checkpointing is less important. I think I disagree, so 
just a quick comment from me.

Yes, absolutely, there's much more computing power and much better I/O. 
There are also lots of efficiency gains -- much better compilers, for 
example. However, if anything the data volumes and related requirements 
are growing even faster. We've also seen recent, real world incidents 
involving major organizations failing to meet batch processing deadlines 
with serious consequences, in some cases to whole national economies. My 
anecdotal observation is that checkpointing is becoming more important at 
least on z/OS, not less. By sheer coincidence I'm having a technical 
conversation this afternoon that (when you boil it down to its essence) is 

"please implement a certain type of checkpointing."

I interpreted this particular remark as a side comment, not really 
anything that genuinely affects whether pipes are useful in some cases. 
Yes, pipes are useful. It's not necessary to bash checkpointing in defense 

of pipes, or vice versa.

- - - - - - - - - -
Timothy Sipples
I.T. Architect Executive
Digital Asset & Other Industry Solutions
IBM Z & LinuxONE
- - - - - - - - - -
E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to