AW: Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

2018-05-11 Thread Peter Hunkeler
Paul, are you continuing to bother us under a new pseudonym now?

--
Peter Hunkeler


 Von: somitcw <01b1f179dc6e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> An:  
 IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Betreff: Re: GETMAIN LOC=32 Datum: 11.05.18, 07:29


SG24-7605-00
z/OS Version 1 Release 10 Implementation
April 2009
Pages 6 and 104
Claims that next to E-Nuc is ESQA, ELPA, ECSA, then E-private.

When did they move?
Are we requesting a feature that is already there?
IBM could do that real quick.

Paul's wanting SVC 120 to get memory up to 4GB-1 and
have IARV64 and IARST64 stick with 33 to 64bit addresses
would actually need a couple of code changes and a little
documentation.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


AW: Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

2018-05-08 Thread Peter Hunkeler
This thread was one of the most amusing threads I read for a while. It's only a 
quarter to 9am here, but this was definitely the highlight of the day, not to 
say the week.

Kudos to all of you who have patiently responded to Paul's arguments, trying to 
convince him he's wrong.

--Peter Hunkeler


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN