.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Conley
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 7:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Any reason to still use SWA=BELOW?
Just wondering if there is any reason to still use SWA=BELOW. I'm seeing this
in a JES2
, not by JES2.
>Just wondering if there is any reason to still use SWA=BELOW. I'm
>seeing this in a JES2 parm member and I'm surprised, since I changed to
>SWA=ABOVE ages ago.
>
>Regards,
>Tom Conley
>
>--
If something/some program executing in that jobclass (I assume it's a batch
initiator) is still running control blocks and not using SWAREQ, then yes it
might be needed.
Mark Jacobs
Tom Conley wrote on 10/8/18 8:37 PM:
Just wondering if there is any reason to still use SWA=BELOW. I'm
seeing
Just wondering if there is any reason to still use SWA=BELOW. I'm
seeing this in a JES2 parm member and I'm surprised, since I changed to
SWA=ABOVE ages ago.
Regards,
Tom Conley
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
