You might want to look at my SHARE presentation
http://share.confex.com/data/handout/share/126/Session_18592_handout_9070_0.pdf
I describe how BCPii is used to automate a daily DR test.
The lack of support for zVM is indeed annoying. I spoke to Steve
Warren(responsible for BCPII development at
That explains "A158" and "3090" (and "C580") :-) True dat. :-)
In my new "How To Be A Better Performance Specialist (Than Martin Packer)"
:-) presentation I reinforce the importance of having a view of an
installation's history.
I was talking last week to a customer's "NextGen z" people with
I've known shops that let serial or model number creep into naming conventions.
Like Mark, we control names across upgrades. Back in the Stone Age, IBM used to
recommend embedding model number in SMF and JES names. And that required a cold
start to change! Sort of nuts it seems to me.
.
.
.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:25:45 -0700, Ed Jaffe
wrote:
>On 4/26/2016 1:13 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
>> When my client replaces their CPCs the name is kept the same. For example
>> CPCA, CPCB, CPCC, ... etc. The RACF profile is based on that name so
>> nothing needs to
On 4/26/2016 1:13 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
When my client replaces their CPCs the name is kept the same. For example
CPCA, CPCB, CPCC, ... etc. The RACF profile is based on that name so
nothing needs to be changed in RACF.
A RACF SEARCH command produces the following profiles beginning with
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 07:58:23 -0700, Ed Jaffe
wrote:
>Oh yeah, and I need to set up a
>slew of HWI security profiles in RACF with our new CPC serial number.
>Ugh. Another time...
>
When my client replaces their CPCs the name is kept the same. For example
CPCA,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 07:58:23 -0700, Ed Jaffe
wrote:
>On 4/25/2016 5:20 PM, Pinnacle wrote:
>> :-P BCPii is fairly prevalent these days.
>> It's enabled everywhere I've been.
>
>Now that we're talking about BCPii, despite it being a _totally,
>completely and
I have to agree that BCPii is an inappropriate answer to OP's question. We had
to set it up years ago when we went to GDPS to manage our DR environment. We
soon expanded its role to include all LPARs (except z/VM) on all CECs. I highly
recommend BCPii , which is more powerful today than when we
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Ed Jaffe
wrote:
> On 4/25/2016 5:20 PM, Pinnacle wrote:
>
>> :-P BCPii is fairly prevalent these days. It's
>> enabled everywhere I've been.
>>
>
> Now that we're talking about BCPii, despite it being a _totally,
> completely and
On 4/25/2016 5:20 PM, Pinnacle wrote:
:-P BCPii is fairly prevalent these days.
It's enabled everywhere I've been.
Now that we're talking about BCPii, despite it being a _totally,
completely and thoroughly_ inappropriate solution to the OP's original
question, I gotta wonder how prevalent
10 matches
Mail list logo