I don't know how many here have had to moderate a message board. I
have, and it isn't as simple as just 'removing a thread'. In order to
make sure that *nothing* is off-topic, you have to ignore what the
header says (since many people simply 'reply' and leave whatever header
is there, while inserting their own content). Sometimes a header that
looks off-topic contains relevant material. It is possible for
hundreds of messages to be posted in one day, and if you aren't a 'full
time' moderator it may be several days before you get looking at
everything. While it may be possible to identify off-topic threads
based upon the header, depending on how often one looks at messages even
that may not highlight the 'problem' immediately due to the sheer number
to have to review. Sometimes no matter how good your intentions,
someone files a first amendment lawsuit. So, perhaps it is better
sometimes to wait and see if a topic dies on its own before taking action.
I coach water polo, and attend all referee meetings. One of the most
talked about topic is how parents and coaches interact with referees.
Everyone thinks they are justified in whatever comments they make to
referees, no matter how inappropriate - so the best reply is "if you
think you can do a better job, volunteer to do it yourself". Criticism
is easy. It takes more than complaining to solve the problem. 'Nuff
said, I think. Back on 'lurk'...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
