On 10/15/2018 12:19 AM, Martin Packer wrote:
Now, an interesting (to me) question is whether the 4-character version is
unique.
I've always assumed they are not *guaranteed* unique, but in practice
they seem to be. Serial numbers are so sparse that we see customers
*routinely* upgrade from
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: CPU ID display incorrect?
BTW "84" is Singapore, FWIW.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs
ISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 15/10/2018 13:46
Subject: Re: CPU ID display incorrect?
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Tony Thigpen wrote:
>Ok, I was not thinking clearly yesterday.
Nevermind, Sunday is supposed to be a day to rest, go to church and enjoy
your few preciou
Tony Thigpen wrote:
>Ok, I was not thinking clearly yesterday.
Nevermind, Sunday is supposed to be a day to rest, go to church and enjoy your
few precious times with your family, but we z/Os support don't have that
luxury, we must respond within 3.5 nanoseconds once a problem appears no matter
Ok, I was not thinking clearly yesterday.
My 'well seasoned' z/OS systems programmer was having a FIT because he
thought someone had sent the vendor the wrong CPU-ID for an expiring
product (VTAM-Switch) that was scheduled for a key installation this
weekend. He is two timezones away and was
Tell us what it says, please. :-)
Seriously, if TFM fails to cover the ground adequately let us know.
Thanks, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 15 Oct 2018, at 08:24, Elardus Engelbrecht
wrote:
>
> Martin Packer wrote:
>
>> It could be because the OP expects to see the 5-character version of the
Martin Packer wrote:
>It could be because the OP expects to see the 5-character version of the CPU
>ID. But, since the advent of PR/SM we’ve only ever had the 4-character version.
>In SMF we show the 4-character in CPU Data Section in Type 70 but fuller
>versions - because I asked for them
It could be because the OP expects to see the 5-character version of the
CPU ID. But, since the advent of PR/SM we’ve only ever had the 4-character
version.
In SMF we show the 4-character in CPU Data Section in Type 70 but fuller
versions - because I asked for them long ago :-) - in other places
Tony Thigpen wrote:
>Why would the D M=CPU display a wrong number.
What number? What is wrong?
Perhaps something is wrong because you read/posted it on a Sunday? ;-)
>Running z/os 1.13 on a z12-BC.
>17.13.21 HKYP d m=cpu
>17.13.21 HKYP IEE174I 17.13.21 DISPLAY M 204
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2018 2:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: CPU ID display incorrect?
Why would the D M=CPU display a wrong number.
Running z/os 1.13 on a z12-BC.
17.13.21 HKYP
] On
Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2018 2:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: CPU ID display incorrect?
Why would the D M=CPU display a wrong number.
Running z/os 1.13 on a z12-BC.
17.13.21 HKYP d m=cpu
17.13.21 HKYP IEE174I 17.13.21 DISPLAY M 204
PROCESSOR
Why would the D M=CPU display a wrong number.
Running z/os 1.13 on a z12-BC.
17.13.21 HKYP d m=cpu
17.13.21 HKYP IEE174I 17.13.21 DISPLAY M 204
PROCESSOR STATUS
ID CPU SERIAL
00 + 0758C72828
CPC ND = 002828.H06.IBM.84.000A58C7
CPC
12 matches
Mail list logo
