⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 9:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: CTC conventions
IMHO as every convention, this one is limited. You
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ed Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 9:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: CTC conventions
On 10/17/2018 6:44 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
> In hindsight I
IMHO as every convention, this one is limited. You cannot put any number
of CPCs or LPARs in it. And you don't need it.
From the other hand any fixed-lingth field means some lost, overhead,
i.e. One hex for CPC? That's to much for two CPCs in a shop and can be
completely omitted for single
On 10/17/2018 6:44 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
In hindsight I rue the decision to set aside both 4xxx and 5xxx addresses. In
practice, the low order digit is severely underused. In the beginning I thought
that we would need several different 'devices' for each LPAR. Never actually
found a
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 6:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: CTC conventions
On 10/17/2018 4:23 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
> Just to be clear, a CTC naming convention is not tied uniquely to ESCON or
> FICON architecture. We implemented a scheme in the m
On 10/17/2018 4:23 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
Just to be clear, a CTC naming convention is not tied uniquely to ESCON or
FICON architecture. We implemented a scheme in the mid-90s under ESCON well
before the advent of FICON. It's still in effect.
The scheme we adopted (at IBM's suggestion)
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Allan Staller
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 11:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: CTC conventions
Thanks Rob,
I found that book, but went right past the "ESCON CTC Device Numbering Scheme"
on page 5.
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Allan Staller
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 11:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: CTC conventions
Thanks Rob,
I found that book, but went right past the "ESCON CTC Device Numbering Scheme"
on page 5.
A virtual b
Thanks Daniel.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Blake, Daniel J [CTR]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CTC conventions
Not sure if this is it,
https://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url
DU
Subject: Re: CTC conventions
Goog this, Allan: "redbook paper ficon ctc implementation." Top of the list.
First Tennessee Bank
Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018
: CTC conventions
Esteemed Listers,
I am in the process of adding a new LPAR to my sysplex and need some
documentation for CTC naming conventions.
Many moons ago, there existed a document with a suggested naming convention
such that device addresses could be associated with a particular LPAR
ERV.UA.EDU
Subject: CTC conventions
[External Email]
Esteemed Listers,
I am in the process of adding a new LPAR to my sysplex and need some
documentation for CTC naming conventions.
Many moons ago, there existed a document with a suggested naming convention
such that device addresses could be
Esteemed Listers,
I am in the process of adding a new LPAR to my sysplex and need some
documentation for CTC naming conventions.
Many moons ago, there existed a document with a suggested naming convention
such that device addresses could be associated with a particular LPAR and the
direction
13 matches
Mail list logo
