Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-06-01 Thread Glenn Wilcock
Hi Lizette, We want to have the documentation as helpful as possible. It would certainly be reasonable for you to open a Request for Publication Change to add information in the HSM SA to indicate that the DFSMShsm Managing Your Own Data has additional information available regarding using

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-06-01 Thread Lizette Koehler
Will do Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Glenn Wilcock Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 9:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING Hi Lizette, We want to have

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-06-01 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In CAJTOO5-e=vog373+b6lnuxdu+zkn2+8w2essamhb0vshxrd...@mail.gmail.com, on 05/29/2015 at 11:11 AM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com said: Admins can't do wildcards on dataset names, since they are bypassing RACF. Shirley knott. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-29 Thread Andy Gilman
Thanks Greg. It's odd that IBM left this out of the Storage Admin manual. I tried some recalls using a pattern mask as shown in the TSO Help output, and it worked (with a single * representing a single qualifier in the data set name). Andy

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-29 Thread Lizette Koehler
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 9:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING On Fri, 29 May 2015 10:46:01 -0500, Andy Gilman wrote: Thanks Greg. It's odd that IBM left this out of the Storage Admin

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-29 Thread Tom Marchant
On Fri, 29 May 2015 10:46:01 -0500, Andy Gilman wrote: Thanks Greg. It's odd that IBM left this out of the Storage Admin manual. I tried some recalls using a pattern mask as shown in the TSO Help output, and it worked (with a single * representing a single qualifier in the data set name).

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-29 Thread Mike Schwab
Admins can't do wildcards on dataset names, since they are bypassing RACF. End users can do wildcards on dataset names, since they are using RACF. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Andy Gilman andrew.gil...@assurant.com wrote: Thanks Greg. It's odd that IBM left this out of the Storage Admin

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-29 Thread Andy Gilman
Tom, I looked for your example in the DFSMShsm Storage Administration manual and couldn't find it. Is it possible you are using some other tool to manage your HSM environment? Thanks. Andy -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-29 Thread Greg Shirey
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING Tom, I looked for your example in the DFSMShsm Storage Administration manual and couldn't find it. Is it possible you are using some other tool to manage your HSM environment? Thanks. Andy

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-29 Thread Lizette Koehler
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 9:38 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING Probably because I do not want to have to look in multiple manuals for information. RECALL and HRECALL should, from my

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-22 Thread John Clifford
for the RECALL command. Did not see FILTER in there. So I will look a little more. Thanks Lizette -Original Message- From: Tom Marchant 000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu Sent: May 21, 2015 12:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-21 Thread Staller, Allan
Sounds good to me. An alternative would be to user DCOLLECT TYPE M records to get the same info. A little less logic would be needed. With CSI, you will need to determine if the dataset is migrated via the volser. DCOLLECT TYPE M records only come from the MCDS so this might be simpler. HTH,

HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-21 Thread Lizette Koehler
I am fairly certain I know this answer, but thought I would ask it anyway. We have a need from time to time to do a large number of recalls (5000 or more) at a time. The datasets have a fairly consistent naming convention. But it looks like the RECALL command does not use masks but requires

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-21 Thread Lizette Koehler
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:12:49 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote: But it looks like the RECALL command does not use masks but requires the entire name filled in. Yes, it does. The manual calls it a filter. It gives the example: HRECALL 'ELMST

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-21 Thread Tom Marchant
On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:12:49 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote: But it looks like the RECALL command does not use masks but requires the entire name filled in. Yes, it does. The manual calls it a filter. It gives the example: HRECALL 'ELMST.*.TEXT' NOWAIT -- Tom Marchant

Re: HSM Recalls and MASKING

2015-05-21 Thread retired mainframer
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 11:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: HSM Recalls and MASKING I am fairly certain I know this answer, but thought I would ask it anyway. We have a need from time to time to do a large number of recalls (5000 or more) at a time. The datasets have