>should the doc contain a hint that performance would be
>improved if the token were doubleword aligned?
I say "no". Individual services are not going to document things that are
true everywhere.
Not aligning things might work but might perform worse (not necessarily
because of the
arles
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Peter Relson
> Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 4:59 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IEAVPSE parameter question
>
> It is fine with z
l Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Peter Relson
> Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 4:59 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IEAVPSE parameter question
>
> It is fine with z/OS itself if you use t
point out
that doubleword alignment would be beneficial?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 4:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEAVPSE parameter question
It is fine with z/OS itself if you use the same field for both the input
token and the updated token.
Whether it works for you will depend on whether you care. Maybe your
recovery looks at something that wants to know if you still have the old
token vs the updated one.
The functionality of
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 12:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEAVPSE parameter question
I can really only echo what Chris Blaicher said. Setting up multiple DUs (TCBs
and SRBs) with their own PEs, an
I can really only echo what Chris Blaicher said. Setting up multiple
DUs (TCBs and SRBs) with their own PEs, and managing the PETs can be a
mind-bending experience. I can't say why you can't use the same field
for the updated token, but I strongly suspect you cannot. It's been
more than a year
.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 2:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IEAVPSE parameter question
For IEAVPSE, can pause_element_token and updated_pause_element_token
For IEAVPSE, can pause_element_token and updated_pause_element_token both be
the same field? I don't see much use for the old pause_element_token after
IEAVPSE completes.
Charles
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
