>>What it doesn't do is tag the file in USS as binary (imho it should).
>>
>Does it make a difference? What mode bits does it set?
The files are untagged. Tagging them as binary would be helpful as I plan to
use them with Git.
Lionel B. Dyck <
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
"Worry more
On Thu, 7 May 2020 11:28:04 -0500, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
>The answer on how the aliases are maintained is unknown but this is what the
>man page says (below). I did test it and using -X and -I works in both
>directions. There are no additional files in the USS directory so perhaps they
>are inc
re about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are." - John Wooden
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 11:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Su
On Thu, 7 May 2020 09:25:55 -0500, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
>With z/OS 2.2/2.3/2.4 I have the -X option which supports the use of cp for
>load modules (executables) between z/OS and USS and back. I only have the
>-I (support to retain executable aliases) on the 2.4 system.
>
How is that implemented,
With z/OS 2.2/2.3/2.4 I have the -X option which supports the use of cp for
load modules (executables) between z/OS and USS and back. I only have the
-I (support to retain executable aliases) on the 2.4 system.
Does anyone know if the -I option has been made available via PTF for 2.2
and 2.3?
