Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 MY APOLGIES BINYIAMIN was right I had the wrong PC number he knows me to well thank you
-- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 Posted code
From: Joe Reichman [mailto:reichman...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 2:44 PM To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'Subject: This is the program that is causing the abend TESTRCOV AMODE 31 TESTRCOV RMODE ANY YREGS AR0 EQU 0 AR1 EQU 1 AR2 EQU 2 AR3 EQU 3 AR4 EQU 4 AR5 EQU 5 AR6 EQU 6 AR7 EQU 7 AR8 EQU 8 AR9 EQU 9 AR10 EQU 10 AR11 EQU 11 AR12 EQU 12 AR13 EQU 13 AR14 EQU 14 AR15 EQU 15 ** * Address Space Recovery Rtn|6 * |7 * Determine Address Space and Type of Abend |8 * |9 * Give user OPtion of Sdump | 10 *++ 34 LRR3,R15 USING TESTRCOV,R3 LRR4,R1 Save Sdwa Address LRR10,R14 WTO 'In TESTrcov rtn ..' * **---*41 ** SET ADDRESSABILITY SDWA EXTENSION *42 **---*43 USING WS_DSECT,R13 USING SDWA,R4 Address SDWA LRR7,R4 L R4,SDWAXPAD Get Record Able Area DROP R4 USING SDWAPTRS,R4 L R4,SDWASRVP DROP R4 USING SDWARC1,R4 CLI SDWATYPE,SDWATFRR Is This a FRR BNE IS_ESTAENo Must Be Is An Estae LRR13,R0 Point to work area STR10,SAVE14 STR7,SDWADDR B PROCESS IS_ESTAE DS0H STR10,SAVE14 STR7,SDWADDR TESTAUTH FCTN=1,STATE=YES,KEY=YES BZPROCESS LRR4,R7 DROP R4 USING SDWA,R4 ICM R2,B'',SDWAPARM Get Paramters *L R2,0(,R2) STR2,USER_PARM USING ESTPARM,R2 ICM R6,B'',SDWAPC Get PC control USING HRPCRTN,R6 LMH R15,15,HRATSQ L R8,HRSTNO LRR7,R4Hold R4 L R4,=F'-1' *-- PC0(R8)Make us Authorized < PC rtn * Program creating PC rtn TESTRCOV CSECT 00010076 TESTRCOV AMODE 31 00011076 TESTRCOV RMODE 31 00012076 YREGS 0002 AR0 EQU 0 00020153 AR1 EQU 0 00020253 AR2 EQU 0 00020353 AR3 EQU 0 00020453 AR4 EQU 0 00020553 AR5 EQU 0 00020653 AR6 EQU 0 00020753 AR7 EQU 0 00020853 AR8 EQU 0 00020953 AR9 EQU 0 00021053 ARA EQU 0 00021153 ARB EQU 0 00021253 ARC EQU 0 00021353 ARD EQU 0 00021453 ARE EQU 0 00021553 ARF EQU 0 00021653 STM R14,R12,12(R13) 00022053 LRR8,R15ESTABLISH ADDRESSABILITY 00030016 USING TESTRCOV,R8 00030176 LRR14,R13 00030236 LAR13,SAVEAREA 00030336 STR14,SAVEAREA+4 00030436 LAR0,WS_LEN 00030588 STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R0),ADDR=(R5) 00030789 LRR10,R13 00030888 LRR13,R5 00030988 USING WS_DSECT,R13 00031088 STR10,4(,R13) 00031188 * 00031388 LA R0,((SDWAEND-SDWA)+(SDWASEND-SDWARC1)+(SDWAIEND-SDWARC2)X00031476 +(SDWALEND-SDWARC3)+(SDWAEEND-SDWARC4)+(SDWAPEND-SDWAPTRX00031576 S)+(SDWAPTRS-SDWAPEND)+(SDWAREND-SDWANRC1)+(SDWASEN-SDWAX00031676 NRC2)+(SDWADEND-SDWANRC3)) 00031776 STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R0),ADDR=(R6),SP=0 00031876 LA R0,24 00031976 B XMEM 00032199 *STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R0),ADDR=(R7),SP=227 00032299 *USING ESTPARM,R7 00032699 * 00033377 *-* 00033485 * LOAD TESTAUTH AND MAKE MAKE IT A PC RTN * 00033585 *-* 00033685 * 00033785 * GIVE US ABILITY TO DO ALL XMEM STUFF 00033885 00033985 XMEM DS0H 00034096 XCECB,ECB 00034299 LAR1,ECB 00034399 XRR1,R1 00034499 MODESET KEY=ZERO,MODE=SUP 00034599 LA R0,LESTPARM+HRPCNMS 00034699 STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R0),ADDR=(R5),SP=228 00034799 L R3,16 00034899 USING CVT,R3 00034999 STR5,CVTUSER 00035099 USING ESTPARM,R5 00035199
Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002
Okay I’ll post both the invoking program and the one with the ETDEF at 1 Pm USA EST thanks for your help > On Jan 9, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> > wrote: > > Many possibilities, including generating the wrong PC number. > > I would suggest posting you entire program. > > On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 21:31:44 -0500 Joe Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com> wrote: > > :>I just ran the program again under TESTAUTH and did a WHERE after I got the > abend from TESTAUTH its pointing to the inst right after the PC thing is the > PC rtn does what it is supposed to do and I can continue executing > :> > :>-Original Message- > :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll > :>Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 9:20 PM > :>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > :>Subject: Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 > :> > :>Are you sure the 0C2 is occurring at the PC instruction, not because your > program is in problem state when issuing the ETDEF or ETCON macros? I would > run outside of TESTAUTH, so I could get a dump and then look at the PC table > definitions to ensure they are what you are expecting. > :>Wayne Driscoll > :>Rocket Software > :>Note - All opinions are strictly my own. > :> > :>-Original Message- > :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Joe Reichman > :>Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 7:29 PM > :>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > :>Subject: Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 > :> > :>I have an OLD ESA/390 Pops book I am quoting from > :> > :> "if the current PSW specifies problem state the current PSW-key mask in > control register 3 is tested against the AKM and PSW key mask are anded and > if the result I zero a privilege operation is recognized" > :> > :>So If I am in problem state the AKM field which I specified as everything 0 > :>- 15 determines if the PC is a privileged operation > :> > :>-----Original Message----- > :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Charles Mills > :>Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 7:44 PM > :>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > :>Subject: Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 > :> > :>S0C2 is not a key problem, it is a state problem. Does your S0C2 PSW show > supervisor state? > :> > :>Is there any possible cause for S0C2 *other* than "you tried a privileged > op code but you were not in supervisor state"? > :> > :>Charles > :> > :> > :>-Original Message- > :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Joe Reichman > :>Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 3:55 PM > :>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > :>Subject: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 > :> > :>Hi > :> > :> > :> > :>I have a PC rtn defined in the following way with AKM=(0:15) meaning all > keys can access > :> > :> > :> > :> ETDEF TYPE=SET,ETEADR=ETD,ROUTINE=(R2),SSWITCH=YES, X > :> > :> STATE=SUPERVISOR,AKM=(0:15),EKM=0,PC=STACKING > :> > :> > :> > :> > :> > :>And yet while running under TESTAUTH I get the following ABEND > :> > :> > :> > :>IKJ56641I TESTPRGK ENDED DUE TO ERROR > :> > :>IKJ56640I SYSTEM ABEND CODE 0C2 REASON CODE 0002 > :> > :>-- > :>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > :> > :>-- > :>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ? 77 > Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ? Main Office Toll Free Number: +1 > 855.577.4323 Contact Customer Support: > https://my.rocketsoftware.com/RocketCommunity/RCEmailSupport > :>Unsubscribe from Marketing Messages/Manage Your Subscription Preferences - > http://www.rocketsoftware.com/manage-your-email-preferences > :>Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy > :> > :> > :>This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information > of Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is
Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002
Many possibilities, including generating the wrong PC number. I would suggest posting you entire program. On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 21:31:44 -0500 Joe Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com> wrote: :>I just ran the program again under TESTAUTH and did a WHERE after I got the abend from TESTAUTH its pointing to the inst right after the PC thing is the PC rtn does what it is supposed to do and I can continue executing :> :>-Original Message- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll :>Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 9:20 PM :>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU :>Subject: Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 :> :>Are you sure the 0C2 is occurring at the PC instruction, not because your program is in problem state when issuing the ETDEF or ETCON macros? I would run outside of TESTAUTH, so I could get a dump and then look at the PC table definitions to ensure they are what you are expecting. :>Wayne Driscoll :>Rocket Software :>Note - All opinions are strictly my own. :> :>-Original Message- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Joe Reichman :>Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 7:29 PM :>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU :>Subject: Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 :> :>I have an OLD ESA/390 Pops book I am quoting from :> :> "if the current PSW specifies problem state the current PSW-key mask in control register 3 is tested against the AKM and PSW key mask are anded and if the result I zero a privilege operation is recognized" :> :>So If I am in problem state the AKM field which I specified as everything 0 :>- 15 determines if the PC is a privileged operation :> :>-Original Message- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills :>Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 7:44 PM :>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU :>Subject: Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 :> :>S0C2 is not a key problem, it is a state problem. Does your S0C2 PSW show supervisor state? :> :>Is there any possible cause for S0C2 *other* than "you tried a privileged op code but you were not in supervisor state"? :> :>Charles :> :> :>-Original Message- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Joe Reichman :>Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 3:55 PM :>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU :>Subject: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 :> :>Hi :> :> :> :>I have a PC rtn defined in the following way with AKM=(0:15) meaning all keys can access :> :> :> :> ETDEF TYPE=SET,ETEADR=ETD,ROUTINE=(R2),SSWITCH=YES, X :> :> STATE=SUPERVISOR,AKM=(0:15),EKM=0,PC=STACKING :> :> :> :> :> :>And yet while running under TESTAUTH I get the following ABEND :> :> :> :>IKJ56641I TESTPRGK ENDED DUE TO ERROR :> :>IKJ56640I SYSTEM ABEND CODE 0C2 REASON CODE 0002 :> :>-- :>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN :> :>-- :>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ? 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ? Main Office Toll Free Number: +1 855.577.4323 Contact Customer Support: https://my.rocketsoftware.com/RocketCommunity/RCEmailSupport :>Unsubscribe from Marketing Messages/Manage Your Subscription Preferences - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/manage-your-email-preferences :>Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy :> :> :>This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information of Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket Software immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you. :> :>-- :>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN :> :>-- :>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, :>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> http://www.dissensoftwar
Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002
I just ran the program again under TESTAUTH and did a WHERE after I got the abend from TESTAUTH its pointing to the inst right after the PC thing is the PC rtn does what it is supposed to do and I can continue executing -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 9:20 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 Are you sure the 0C2 is occurring at the PC instruction, not because your program is in problem state when issuing the ETDEF or ETCON macros? I would run outside of TESTAUTH, so I could get a dump and then look at the PC table definitions to ensure they are what you are expecting. Wayne Driscoll Rocket Software Note - All opinions are strictly my own. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Joe Reichman Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 7:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 I have an OLD ESA/390 Pops book I am quoting from "if the current PSW specifies problem state the current PSW-key mask in control register 3 is tested against the AKM and PSW key mask are anded and if the result I zero a privilege operation is recognized" So If I am in problem state the AKM field which I specified as everything 0 - 15 determines if the PC is a privileged operation -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 7:44 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 S0C2 is not a key problem, it is a state problem. Does your S0C2 PSW show supervisor state? Is there any possible cause for S0C2 *other* than "you tried a privileged op code but you were not in supervisor state"? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Joe Reichman Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 3:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 Hi I have a PC rtn defined in the following way with AKM=(0:15) meaning all keys can access ETDEF TYPE=SET,ETEADR=ETD,ROUTINE=(R2),SSWITCH=YES, X STATE=SUPERVISOR,AKM=(0:15),EKM=0,PC=STACKING And yet while running under TESTAUTH I get the following ABEND IKJ56641I TESTPRGK ENDED DUE TO ERROR IKJ56640I SYSTEM ABEND CODE 0C2 REASON CODE 0002 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ■ 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ■ Main Office Toll Free Number: +1 855.577.4323 Contact Customer Support: https://my.rocketsoftware.com/RocketCommunity/RCEmailSupport Unsubscribe from Marketing Messages/Manage Your Subscription Preferences - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/manage-your-email-preferences Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information of Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket Software immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002
Are you sure the 0C2 is occurring at the PC instruction, not because your program is in problem state when issuing the ETDEF or ETCON macros? I would run outside of TESTAUTH, so I could get a dump and then look at the PC table definitions to ensure they are what you are expecting. Wayne Driscoll Rocket Software Note - All opinions are strictly my own. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Joe Reichman Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 7:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 I have an OLD ESA/390 Pops book I am quoting from "if the current PSW specifies problem state the current PSW-key mask in control register 3 is tested against the AKM and PSW key mask are anded and if the result I zero a privilege operation is recognized" So If I am in problem state the AKM field which I specified as everything 0 - 15 determines if the PC is a privileged operation -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 7:44 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 S0C2 is not a key problem, it is a state problem. Does your S0C2 PSW show supervisor state? Is there any possible cause for S0C2 *other* than "you tried a privileged op code but you were not in supervisor state"? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Joe Reichman Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 3:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 Hi I have a PC rtn defined in the following way with AKM=(0:15) meaning all keys can access ETDEF TYPE=SET,ETEADR=ETD,ROUTINE=(R2),SSWITCH=YES, X STATE=SUPERVISOR,AKM=(0:15),EKM=0,PC=STACKING And yet while running under TESTAUTH I get the following ABEND IKJ56641I TESTPRGK ENDED DUE TO ERROR IKJ56640I SYSTEM ABEND CODE 0C2 REASON CODE 0002 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ■ 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ■ Main Office Toll Free Number: +1 855.577.4323 Contact Customer Support: https://my.rocketsoftware.com/RocketCommunity/RCEmailSupport Unsubscribe from Marketing Messages/Manage Your Subscription Preferences - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/manage-your-email-preferences Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information of Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket Software immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002
I have an OLD ESA/390 Pops book I am quoting from "if the current PSW specifies problem state the current PSW-key mask in control register 3 is tested against the AKM and PSW key mask are anded and if the result I zero a privilege operation is recognized" So If I am in problem state the AKM field which I specified as everything 0 - 15 determines if the PC is a privileged operation -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 7:44 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 S0C2 is not a key problem, it is a state problem. Does your S0C2 PSW show supervisor state? Is there any possible cause for S0C2 *other* than "you tried a privileged op code but you were not in supervisor state"? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Joe Reichman Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 3:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 Hi I have a PC rtn defined in the following way with AKM=(0:15) meaning all keys can access ETDEF TYPE=SET,ETEADR=ETD,ROUTINE=(R2),SSWITCH=YES, X STATE=SUPERVISOR,AKM=(0:15),EKM=0,PC=STACKING And yet while running under TESTAUTH I get the following ABEND IKJ56641I TESTPRGK ENDED DUE TO ERROR IKJ56640I SYSTEM ABEND CODE 0C2 REASON CODE 0002 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002
S0C2 is not a key problem, it is a state problem. Does your S0C2 PSW show supervisor state? Is there any possible cause for S0C2 *other* than "you tried a privileged op code but you were not in supervisor state"? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Joe Reichman Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 3:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002 Hi I have a PC rtn defined in the following way with AKM=(0:15) meaning all keys can access ETDEF TYPE=SET,ETEADR=ETD,ROUTINE=(R2),SSWITCH=YES, X STATE=SUPERVISOR,AKM=(0:15),EKM=0,PC=STACKING And yet while running under TESTAUTH I get the following ABEND IKJ56641I TESTPRGK ENDED DUE TO ERROR IKJ56640I SYSTEM ABEND CODE 0C2 REASON CODE 0002 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
PC rtn AKM=(0:15) Getting S0C2 REASON 002
Hi I have a PC rtn defined in the following way with AKM=(0:15) meaning all keys can access ETDEF TYPE=SET,ETEADR=ETD,ROUTINE=(R2),SSWITCH=YES, X STATE=SUPERVISOR,AKM=(0:15),EKM=0,PC=STACKING And yet while running under TESTAUTH I get the following ABEND IKJ56641I TESTPRGK ENDED DUE TO ERROR IKJ56640I SYSTEM ABEND CODE 0C2 REASON CODE 0002 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN