Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: PDSEGEN - 2 years old

2018-06-11 Thread Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek)
AIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: PDSEGEN - 2 years old That's it for me. I like JCL and working source libraries to have 2-5 generations just so I can go back if the need arises (or I just accidentally save when I didn't really want to). As a side note, the other "improvements" with

Re: PDSEGEN - 2 years old

2018-06-11 Thread Steve Smith
That's it for me. I like JCL and working source libraries to have 2-5 generations just so I can go back if the need arises (or I just accidentally save when I didn't really want to). As a side note, the other "improvements" with PDSE V2 seem to cause problems when trying to scroll max down

Re: PDSEGEN - 2 years old

2018-06-11 Thread Jerry Callen
So, I'm curious: What are people actually USING member generations for? For source code, it seems like a decent source control system is a better bet. Are member generations primarily a form of "oops recovery?" -- Jerry --

Re: PDSEGEN - 2 years old

2018-06-01 Thread Kevin Corbett
Lionel, Congratulations and happy anniversary to PDSEGEN. I wanted to let you, and the rest of mainframe world, know that File-AID/MVS from Compuware introduced support for PDSE V2 Member Generations in July, 2015 in release 16.3. Our current GA release, 17.2, has continued to provide

PDSEGEN - 2 years old

2018-05-25 Thread Dyck, Lionel B. (RavenTek)
I wanted to let y'all know that PDSEGEN turns 2 years old tomorrow - 5/26. That is the day that I created the very first alpha version of PDSEGEN using information from Thomas Reed's SHARE presentation on how to access PDSE V2 Member Generations. Since then it has grown thanks to the input,