Re: Preparing for a short z/OS contract

2020-11-30 Thread Don Poitras
In article 

 you wrote:
> Rupert Reynolds wrote:
> >Thinking further, I now remember that their only debugger was TSO TEST! I
> >wrote a mixture of Rexx and CLIST commands to extend it a bit (show regs
> >and disassemble the next instruction, every breakpoint).
> >
> >Is there anything more /modern/ that's given away with z/OS?

> Steve Thompson wrote:
> >TSO TEST is all that comes free with the system.

> z/OS also includes dbx, described here (z/OS 2.4 link, subject to change, 
> watch the wrap):

> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r4.bpxa500/bpxa50021.htm


> The very first release of OS/390 (generally available on March 29, 1996, 
> per IBM Announcement Letter 296-018) included an earlier version of dbx, 
> so dbx will very soon reach a full quarter century of history in the base 
> operating system. dbx also had a short, earlier history as a separately 
> chargeable OpenEdition MVS option ("OpenEdition Debugger feature"). Do try 

> to keep up, please. :-)

> According to Wikipedia, dbx's original developer was Mark Linton at the 
> University of California, Berkeley. He wrote dbx in the period 1981 to 
> 1984, and then it percolated through the BSD ecosystem. TSO TEST first 
> appeared no later than 1972, so dbx is about a decade younger. Whether dbx 

> is more "modern" is a separate question. :-)

> Another debugger, IBM z/OS Debugger, is the successor to the IBM 
> Integrated Debugger and IBM Debug Tool. There are lots of IBM software 
> products that include IBM z/OS Debugger -- 6 if I'm counting correctly -- 
> so it's possible or even likely you already have a license. Of course if 
> you don't have a license it's possible to acquire one.

> - - - - - - - - - -
> Timothy Sipples
> I.T. Architect Executive
> Digital Asset & Other Industry Solutions
> IBM Z & LinuxONE
> - - - - - - - - - -
> E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com

The successor to TSO TEST is ASMIDF. It's still being updated, so can be
considered "modern". While the HLASM Toolkit isn't free, it's so cheap, it
might as well be considered so. 

HLASM Toolkit Feature Interactive Debug Facility User's Guide
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSENW6_1.6.0/kc_gen/com.ibm.hlasm.v1r6.asm_asm-gen7.html


-- 
Don Poitras

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Preparing for a short z/OS contract

2020-11-29 Thread Timothy Sipples
Rupert Reynolds wrote:
>Thinking further, I now remember that their only debugger was TSO TEST! I
>wrote a mixture of Rexx and CLIST commands to extend it a bit (show regs
>and disassemble the next instruction, every breakpoint).
>
>Is there anything more /modern/ that's given away with z/OS?

Steve Thompson wrote:
>TSO TEST is all that comes free with the system.

z/OS also includes dbx, described here (z/OS 2.4 link, subject to change, 
watch the wrap):

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r4.bpxa500/bpxa50021.htm


The very first release of OS/390 (generally available on March 29, 1996, 
per IBM Announcement Letter 296-018) included an earlier version of dbx, 
so dbx will very soon reach a full quarter century of history in the base 
operating system. dbx also had a short, earlier history as a separately 
chargeable OpenEdition MVS option ("OpenEdition Debugger feature"). Do try 

to keep up, please. :-)

According to Wikipedia, dbx's original developer was Mark Linton at the 
University of California, Berkeley. He wrote dbx in the period 1981 to 
1984, and then it percolated through the BSD ecosystem. TSO TEST first 
appeared no later than 1972, so dbx is about a decade younger. Whether dbx 

is more "modern" is a separate question. :-)

Another debugger, IBM z/OS Debugger, is the successor to the IBM 
Integrated Debugger and IBM Debug Tool. There are lots of IBM software 
products that include IBM z/OS Debugger -- 6 if I'm counting correctly -- 
so it's possible or even likely you already have a license. Of course if 
you don't have a license it's possible to acquire one.

- - - - - - - - - -
Timothy Sipples
I.T. Architect Executive
Digital Asset & Other Industry Solutions
IBM Z & LinuxONE
- - - - - - - - - -
E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Preparing for a short z/OS contract

2020-11-29 Thread Steve Thompson
As others have said, MVS is MVS. However, z/OS has a lot more of posix (Unixy) 
stuff. 

TSO TEST is all that comes free with the system. 

ISPF is still ISPF. REXX may have a few more commands/functions. 

If they got the debugger (forgot its name) that may help you. I use IPCS and if 
they have it, zXDC for interactive test of ALC and other stuff. 

HTH
 Steve Thompson 

Sent from my iPhone — small keyboarf, fat fungrs, stupd spell manglr. Expct 
mistaks 


> On Nov 29, 2020, at 12:30 PM, Rupert Reynolds  wrote:
> 
> A client from my contracting days has contacted me out of the blue. Perhaps
> only a week, but work is work, right? :-)
> 
> Does anyone have advice they can offer on what to expect these days?
> 
> When I last worked for them, it was ESA/390, ISPF :-)
> 
> Does a lot of PL/1, Assembler and Rexx programming work still get done in
> ISPF, or is it mostly at a *nix terminal?
> 
> I'm comfortable in Linux, for example, but I've not even seen z/OS running,
> so I'm unsure about what to expect.
> 
> Thanks for any advice.
> 
> Roops
> 
>> On Sun., Nov. 29, 2020, 15:18 Martin Packer, 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I would also point out quite a few customers restart CICS on a daily
>> (sometimes weekly) basis. They IPL much less frequently (likewise
>> structure recovery etc).
>> 
>> I should imagine therefore there would have to be a lot of thinking around
>> terms and conditions for something such as restarting CICS. At any rate,
>> that's not what SRB supports.
>> 
>> Cheers, Martin
>> 
>> Martin Packer
>> 
>> Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
>> 
>> +44-7802-245-584
>> 
>> email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
>> 
>> Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
>> 
>> Blog: https://mainframeperformancetopics.com
>> 
>> Mainframe, Performance, Topics Podcast Series (With Marna Walle):
>> https://anchor.fm/marna-walle
>> 
>> Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From:   Peter Relson 
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Date:   29/11/2020 13:11
>> Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: System Boost Question
>> Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Could we use SYSTEM boost to make the process of shutting down the CICS
>> region and restarting them?
>> 
>> 
>> That would not be an appropriate use of the shutdown boost. Shutdown boost
>> 
>> is for shutting down the entire system.
>> 
>> 
>> Note that IBM also has a separate feature called "System Recovery Boost
>> Upgrade" which is unrelated to "System Recovery Boost" ... it is more like
>> CUoD.  That is a paid feature and gives a 6 hour boost in processing
>> speed.
>> 
>> 
>> "Gives a 6 hour boost in processing speed" is not a good characterization
>> of System Recovery Boost Upgrade.  It does not do so. Each activation (and
>> 
>> the upgrade covers multiple) gives you a 6 hour window during which
>> additional processors can be applied to each LPAR when that LPAR is
>> starting up or shutting down. It is during the startup and the shutdown
>> that the additional processors can participate.
>> 
>> Peter Relson
>> z/OS Core Technology Design
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>> 741598.
>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Preparing for a short z/OS contract

2020-11-29 Thread Rupert Reynolds
Thanks for the reassurance.

Thinking further, I now remember that their only debugger was TSO TEST! I
wrote a mixture of Rexx and CLIST commands to extend it a bit (show regs
and disassemble the next instruction, every breakpoint).

Is there anything more /modern/ that's given away with z/OS?

Roops.

On Sun., Nov. 29, 2020, 18:02 Charles Mills,  wrote:

> Some people use SSH and similar tools but ISPF works just like it always
> did; perhaps a tiny bit better.
>
> Charles
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Joe Monk
> Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2020 9:38 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Preparing for a short z/OS contract
>
> you will not have any problems. MVS is MVS.
>
> Joe
>
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:31 AM Rupert Reynolds 
> wrote:
>
> > A client from my contracting days has contacted me out of the blue.
> Perhaps
> > only a week, but work is work, right? :-)
> >
> > Does anyone have advice they can offer on what to expect these days?
> >
> > When I last worked for them, it was ESA/390, ISPF :-)
> >
> > Does a lot of PL/1, Assembler and Rexx programming work still get done in
> > ISPF, or is it mostly at a *nix terminal?
> >
> > I'm comfortable in Linux, for example, but I've not even seen z/OS
> running,
> > so I'm unsure about what to expect.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Preparing for a short z/OS contract

2020-11-29 Thread Charles Mills
Some people use SSH and similar tools but ISPF works just like it always did; 
perhaps a tiny bit better.

Charles


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Joe Monk
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2020 9:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Preparing for a short z/OS contract

you will not have any problems. MVS is MVS.

Joe

On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:31 AM Rupert Reynolds 
wrote:

> A client from my contracting days has contacted me out of the blue. Perhaps
> only a week, but work is work, right? :-)
>
> Does anyone have advice they can offer on what to expect these days?
>
> When I last worked for them, it was ESA/390, ISPF :-)
>
> Does a lot of PL/1, Assembler and Rexx programming work still get done in
> ISPF, or is it mostly at a *nix terminal?
>
> I'm comfortable in Linux, for example, but I've not even seen z/OS running,
> so I'm unsure about what to expect.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Preparing for a short z/OS contract

2020-11-29 Thread Joe Monk
you will not have any problems. MVS is MVS.

Joe

On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:31 AM Rupert Reynolds 
wrote:

> A client from my contracting days has contacted me out of the blue. Perhaps
> only a week, but work is work, right? :-)
>
> Does anyone have advice they can offer on what to expect these days?
>
> When I last worked for them, it was ESA/390, ISPF :-)
>
> Does a lot of PL/1, Assembler and Rexx programming work still get done in
> ISPF, or is it mostly at a *nix terminal?
>
> I'm comfortable in Linux, for example, but I've not even seen z/OS running,
> so I'm unsure about what to expect.
>
> Thanks for any advice.
>
> Roops
>
> On Sun., Nov. 29, 2020, 15:18 Martin Packer, 
> wrote:
>
> > I would also point out quite a few customers restart CICS on a daily
> > (sometimes weekly) basis. They IPL much less frequently (likewise
> > structure recovery etc).
> >
> > I should imagine therefore there would have to be a lot of thinking
> around
> > terms and conditions for something such as restarting CICS. At any rate,
> > that's not what SRB supports.
> >
> > Cheers, Martin
> >
> > Martin Packer
> >
> > Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
> >
> > +44-7802-245-584
> >
> > email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
> >
> > Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
> >
> > Blog: https://mainframeperformancetopics.com
> >
> > Mainframe, Performance, Topics Podcast Series (With Marna Walle):
> > https://anchor.fm/marna-walle
> >
> > Youtube channel:
> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA
> >
> >
> >
> > From:   Peter Relson 
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Date:   29/11/2020 13:11
> > Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: System Boost Question
> > Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > Could we use SYSTEM boost to make the process of shutting down the CICS
> > region and restarting them?
> > 
> >
> > That would not be an appropriate use of the shutdown boost. Shutdown
> boost
> >
> > is for shutting down the entire system.
> >
> > 
> > Note that IBM also has a separate feature called "System Recovery Boost
> > Upgrade" which is unrelated to "System Recovery Boost" ... it is more
> like
> > CUoD.  That is a paid feature and gives a 6 hour boost in processing
> > speed.
> > 
> >
> > "Gives a 6 hour boost in processing speed" is not a good characterization
> > of System Recovery Boost Upgrade.  It does not do so. Each activation
> (and
> >
> > the upgrade covers multiple) gives you a 6 hour window during which
> > additional processors can be applied to each LPAR when that LPAR is
> > starting up or shutting down. It is during the startup and the shutdown
> > that the additional processors can participate.
> >
> > Peter Relson
> > z/OS Core Technology Design
> >
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> > 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU
> >
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Preparing for a short z/OS contract

2020-11-29 Thread Rupert Reynolds
A client from my contracting days has contacted me out of the blue. Perhaps
only a week, but work is work, right? :-)

Does anyone have advice they can offer on what to expect these days?

When I last worked for them, it was ESA/390, ISPF :-)

Does a lot of PL/1, Assembler and Rexx programming work still get done in
ISPF, or is it mostly at a *nix terminal?

I'm comfortable in Linux, for example, but I've not even seen z/OS running,
so I'm unsure about what to expect.

Thanks for any advice.

Roops

On Sun., Nov. 29, 2020, 15:18 Martin Packer, 
wrote:

> I would also point out quite a few customers restart CICS on a daily
> (sometimes weekly) basis. They IPL much less frequently (likewise
> structure recovery etc).
>
> I should imagine therefore there would have to be a lot of thinking around
> terms and conditions for something such as restarting CICS. At any rate,
> that's not what SRB supports.
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
> Martin Packer
>
> Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
>
> +44-7802-245-584
>
> email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
>
> Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
>
> Blog: https://mainframeperformancetopics.com
>
> Mainframe, Performance, Topics Podcast Series (With Marna Walle):
> https://anchor.fm/marna-walle
>
> Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA
>
>
>
> From:   Peter Relson 
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date:   29/11/2020 13:11
> Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: System Boost Question
> Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
>
>
>
> 
> Could we use SYSTEM boost to make the process of shutting down the CICS
> region and restarting them?
> 
>
> That would not be an appropriate use of the shutdown boost. Shutdown boost
>
> is for shutting down the entire system.
>
> 
> Note that IBM also has a separate feature called "System Recovery Boost
> Upgrade" which is unrelated to "System Recovery Boost" ... it is more like
> CUoD.  That is a paid feature and gives a 6 hour boost in processing
> speed.
> 
>
> "Gives a 6 hour boost in processing speed" is not a good characterization
> of System Recovery Boost Upgrade.  It does not do so. Each activation (and
>
> the upgrade covers multiple) gives you a 6 hour window during which
> additional processors can be applied to each LPAR when that LPAR is
> starting up or shutting down. It is during the startup and the shutdown
> that the additional processors can participate.
>
> Peter Relson
> z/OS Core Technology Design
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN