Re: RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT and ACF2

2019-10-28 Thread Gord Tomlin

On 2019-10-28 21:09, Rob Schramm wrote:

If you have an ACF2 system, you can turn on SAF tracing and have it
formatted by SAF macro.  Jobname/STC filtering available.  Caution should
be used when using the tracing.


Thanks Rob. I don't have an ACF2 system, but I might be able to get the 
customer to run the trace.


--

Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507
Support: https://actionsoftware.com/support/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT and ACF2

2019-10-28 Thread Gord Tomlin

On 2019-10-28 21:01, Jon Perryman wrote:

You can easily send a small assembler program that issues this racroute stat 
and issue WTO TEXT= to display the results. Don't bother converting hex to 
display format in the WTO. WTO doesn't care if you include hex data in the 
message text. Use SDSF SE (Select Edit) for the joblog and turn hex on to see 
the hex data.

I would also suggest testing for class "BADCLASS" because it's unlikely to be a 
valid class. Also verify if RACROUTE must run authorized.

If both have RC=0 and REASON=0, then report the problem to CA. If only BADCLASS 
fails, then have the customer list the active classes for ACF2. If both fail, 
then you have some other problem.


Thanks Jon, exactly what I was considering as my next step if I couldn't 
get an answer.


--

Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507
Support: https://actionsoftware.com/support/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT and ACF2

2019-10-28 Thread Rob Schramm
If you have an ACF2 system, you can turn on SAF tracing and have it
formatted by SAF macro.  Jobname/STC filtering available.  Caution should
be used when using the tracing.

Rob Schramm

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019, 21:03 Jon Perryman  wrote:

>  You can easily send a small assembler program that issues this racroute
> stat and issue WTO TEXT= to display the results. Don't bother converting
> hex to display format in the WTO. WTO doesn't care if you include hex data
> in the message text. Use SDSF SE (Select Edit) for the joblog and turn hex
> on to see the hex data.
>
> I would also suggest testing for class "BADCLASS" because it's unlikely to
> be a valid class. Also verify if RACROUTE must run authorized.
>
> If both have RC=0 and REASON=0, then report the problem to CA. If only
> BADCLASS fails, then have the customer list the active classes for ACF2. If
> both fail, then you have some other problem.
>
> Jon.
>
> On Monday, October 28, 2019, 08:00:57 AM PDT, Gord Tomlin <
> gt.ibm.li...@actionsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>  We have recently had a problem reported to us by a customer who runs
> ACF2. In our products, we check for the presence of a resource class
> "$MZCA" using:
>
>   RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT,WORKA=RACFWA,RELEASE=1.9,CLASS=$MZCA,
> DECOUPL=YES,
> MF=(E,LSTAT)
>   .
>   .
>   .
> $MZCADCCL8'$MZCA'
>
> On this customer's system, RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT returns with SAF return
> code 0 ("RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT has completed successfully"), RACF return
> code 0 ("RACF is active and the class (specified in CLASS= or returned
> in NEXT=) is active"), and RACF reason code 0.
>
> However the customer says that, without doubt, the $MZCA class does not
> exist in the ACF2 CLASMAP for that system.
>
> I have not been able to locate/access any information on ACF2 return
> codes for RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT. Is there any condition where ACF2 would
> return an indication that a resource class is active when the resource
> class does not actually exist?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
>
> Regards, Gord Tomlin
> Action Software International
> (a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
> Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507
> Support: https://actionsoftware.com/support/
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT and ACF2

2019-10-28 Thread Jon Perryman
 You can easily send a small assembler program that issues this racroute stat 
and issue WTO TEXT= to display the results. Don't bother converting hex to 
display format in the WTO. WTO doesn't care if you include hex data in the 
message text. Use SDSF SE (Select Edit) for the joblog and turn hex on to see 
the hex data.

I would also suggest testing for class "BADCLASS" because it's unlikely to be a 
valid class. Also verify if RACROUTE must run authorized.

If both have RC=0 and REASON=0, then report the problem to CA. If only BADCLASS 
fails, then have the customer list the active classes for ACF2. If both fail, 
then you have some other problem.

Jon.

On Monday, October 28, 2019, 08:00:57 AM PDT, Gord Tomlin 
 wrote:  
 
 We have recently had a problem reported to us by a customer who runs 
ACF2. In our products, we check for the presence of a resource class 
"$MZCA" using:

          RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT,WORKA=RACFWA,RELEASE=1.9,CLASS=$MZCA,
                DECOUPL=YES,
                MF=(E,LSTAT)
          .
          .
          .
$MZCA    DC    CL8'$MZCA'

On this customer's system, RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT returns with SAF return 
code 0 ("RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT has completed successfully"), RACF return 
code 0 ("RACF is active and the class (specified in CLASS= or returned 
in NEXT=) is active"), and RACF reason code 0.

However the customer says that, without doubt, the $MZCA class does not 
exist in the ACF2 CLASMAP for that system.

I have not been able to locate/access any information on ACF2 return 
codes for RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT. Is there any condition where ACF2 would 
return an indication that a resource class is active when the resource 
class does not actually exist?

Thanks!

--

Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507
Support: https://actionsoftware.com/support/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT and ACF2

2019-10-28 Thread Gord Tomlin
We have recently had a problem reported to us by a customer who runs 
ACF2. In our products, we check for the presence of a resource class 
"$MZCA" using:


 RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT,WORKA=RACFWA,RELEASE=1.9,CLASS=$MZCA,
   DECOUPL=YES,
   MF=(E,LSTAT)
 .
 .
 .
$MZCADCCL8'$MZCA'

On this customer's system, RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT returns with SAF return 
code 0 ("RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT has completed successfully"), RACF return 
code 0 ("RACF is active and the class (specified in CLASS= or returned 
in NEXT=) is active"), and RACF reason code 0.


However the customer says that, without doubt, the $MZCA class does not 
exist in the ACF2 CLASMAP for that system.


I have not been able to locate/access any information on ACF2 return 
codes for RACROUTE REQUEST=STAT. Is there any condition where ACF2 would 
return an indication that a resource class is active when the resource 
class does not actually exist?


Thanks!

--

Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507
Support: https://actionsoftware.com/support/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN