Re: RFE 145094: No warning on "conflicting" use of "SEQ" keyword in SuperC

2020-09-08 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:03:28 +, Robert Prins wrote: >https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=145094 > >You use SuperC from the ISPF menu, see that there are no differences, copy the >generated JCL into a job, and suddenly there are differences, because you >forgot

RFE 145094: No warning on "conflicting" use of "SEQ" keyword in SuperC

2020-09-08 Thread Robert Prins
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=145094 You use SuperC from the ISPF menu, see that there are no differences, copy the generated JCL into a job, and suddenly there are differences, because you forgot to zap the "SEQ" process option. It does no harm, but