Re: RMM question about adding VRS

2014-04-09 Thread Schroeder, Wayne
] On Behalf Of Mike Wood Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 9:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RMM question about adding VRS ...small addendum to my reply re: step #2 Without checking the full flow of command processing I cant be absolutely certain any more of what rmm does. However, as I

Re: RMM question about adding VRS

2014-04-05 Thread Mike Wood
...small addendum to my reply re: step #2 Without checking the full flow of command processing I cant be absolutely certain any more of what rmm does. However, as I said, it should allow you to change the location information to reflect the actual situation via commands. You might have to

Re: RMM question about adding VRS

2014-04-04 Thread Mike Wood
Wayne, You should not need to retrieve the volumes, re-insert them, and do it all again under VRS control. RMM should be smart enough to make sense of what it finds in the library and what the VRS policy decides. I suggest you 1. Add the rule that will cause rmm to identify what should be in

RMM question about adding VRS

2014-04-01 Thread Schroeder, Wayne
List, I have been archiving SMF/RMF data to a 3592 tape then manually ejecting it and carry it offsite therefor the location is still listed as LIBATL1 in the RMM database. I would like to automate this process and add a VRS rule to send it offsite. If I add a VRS rule for these datasets, what