] On Behalf
Of Mike Wood
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 9:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RMM question about adding VRS
...small addendum to my reply
re: step #2
Without checking the full flow of command processing I cant be absolutely
certain any more of what rmm does.
However, as I
...small addendum to my reply
re: step #2
Without checking the full flow of command processing I cant be absolutely
certain any more of what rmm does.
However, as I said, it should allow you to change the location information to
reflect the actual situation via commands.
You might have to
Wayne,
You should not need to retrieve the volumes, re-insert them, and do it all
again under VRS control.
RMM should be smart enough to make sense of what it finds in the library and
what the VRS policy decides.
I suggest you
1. Add the rule that will cause rmm to identify what should be in
List,
I have been archiving SMF/RMF data to a 3592 tape then manually ejecting it and
carry it offsite therefor the location is still listed as LIBATL1 in the RMM
database. I would like to automate this process and add a VRS rule to send it
offsite. If I add a VRS rule for these datasets, what