Back in my VSE days (DOS/VSE) we created a stand alone IPL tape weekly.
I managed to screw up an IPL volume and we needed the tape and the
procedure. At the time we hadn't a clue how to IPL from tape (yes!).
Fortunately, the systems programmer who set up the procedure was down the
road and he
STSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of
> Jeremy Nicoll
>
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 8:09 AM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: (External):Re: SADUMP IPL tape
>
> *** EXTERNAL EMAIL - Use caution when opening links or attachments ***
>
Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jeremy Nicoll
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 8:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: SADUMP IPL tape
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL - Use caution when opening links or attachments ***
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, at 16:01, Dana Mitchell wrote
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, at 16:01, Dana Mitchell wrote:
> They are definitely different. And even within z/OS there will
> sometimes be a PTF that changes an internal structure such that it has
> an ACTION HOLD telling you that you need to recreate the SADUMP program
But the SADUMP program (at
ity question.
>
>Is the SADUMP IPL tape the same when created by z/OS, z/VM or z/VSE?
>
>Same question for a SADUMP DASD volume?
>
>Tony Thigpen
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access inst
This is a curiosity question.
Is the SADUMP IPL tape the same when created by z/OS, z/VM or z/VSE?
Same question for a SADUMP DASD volume?
Tony Thigpen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
