Re: SMF for cataloged procedures and INCLUDEs. WAS Re: "Trapping" messages written to JESYSMSG?

2019-08-12 Thread Mark Charles
Here is how I handled this at one time: I put this CLIST in **sysproc dsn**: PROC 2 TYPE DSN CONTROL END(ENDO) ERROR DO GOTO OUT

Re: SMF for cataloged procedures and INCLUDEs. WAS Re: "Trapping" messages written to JESYSMSG?

2019-08-09 Thread Tim Hare
I don't check this list regularly but I think you slightly misunderstood. I'm not looking for who is using what procedure _library_. I'm looking for the use of individual members. RACF doesn't (unless it happened in a recent release and I missed it) allow us to audit individual members of

Re: SMF for cataloged procedures and INCLUDEs. WAS Re: "Trapping" messages written to JESYSMSG?

2019-07-05 Thread Allan Staller
The might be some issues w/volume of the type 80's collected. Otherwise it works fine. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2019 4:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMF for cataloged procedures and

Re: SMF for cataloged procedures and INCLUDEs. WAS Re: "Trapping" messages written to JESYSMSG?

2019-07-04 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Tim Hare wrote: >As mentioned before, I've created a SHARE requirement and an RFE to have the >system record the information from the IFC001I (cataloged procedure was >expanded from... msg) and IFC002I (INCLUDE was expanded from... msg) message >in an SMF record.If this would be important

SMF for cataloged procedures and INCLUDEs. WAS Re: "Trapping" messages written to JESYSMSG?

2019-07-03 Thread Tim Hare
As mentioned before, I've created a SHARE requirement and an RFE to have the system record the information from the IFC001I (cataloged procedure was expanded from... msg) and IFC002I (INCLUDE was expanded from... msg) message in an SMF record.If this would be important or useful to your