Re: SSRB/SSRX and LOCAL locks question

2023-06-01 Thread Rob Scott
BM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU<mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> >>Subject: Re: SSRB/SSRX and LOCAL locks question >>EXTERNAL EMAIL >> >> >>I was enquiring specifically about SRBs, not RBs. >>Dave Cole >> >> >> >>At 5/31/2023 05:25 AM,

Re: SSRB/SSRX and LOCAL locks question

2023-05-31 Thread David Cole
wait for it) as the dispatch occurs." Rob Scott Rocket Software From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: 31 May 2023 11:01 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SSRB/SSRX and LOCAL locks question EXTERNAL EMAIL I was enquiring specifically about SRBs, not RBs. Dave Co

Re: SSRB/SSRX and LOCAL locks question

2023-05-31 Thread Rob Scott
Rob Scott Rocket Software From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: 31 May 2023 11:01 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SSRB/SSRX and LOCAL locks question EXTERNAL EMAIL I was enquiring specifically about SRBs, not RBs. Dave Cole At 5/31/2023 05:25 AM

Re: SSRB/SSRX and LOCAL locks question

2023-05-31 Thread David Cole
I was enquiring specifically about SRBs, not RBs. Dave Cole At 5/31/2023 05:25 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote: I don't see how that answers either question. The need for SUSPEND RB caller to be disabled is to allow the resume process to resume it. You cannot schedule the resume process until the

Re: SSRB/SSRX and LOCAL locks question

2023-05-31 Thread Binyamin Dissen
I don't see how that answers either question. The need for SUSPEND RB caller to be disabled is to allow the resume process to resume it. You cannot schedule the resume process until the suspend as otherwise the resume may try resuming before the suspend completes, causing the later suspend to

Re: SSRB/SSRX and LOCAL locks question

2023-05-31 Thread Attila Fogarasi
It's documented as needing either LOCAL or CML lock. See https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.2.0?topic=processing-suspending-rb-until-event-completes-suspend On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 6:20 PM Binyamin Dissen wrote: > On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:42:00 -0400 David Cole wrote: > > :>Does any know if

Re: SSRB/SSRX and LOCAL locks question

2023-05-31 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:42:00 -0400 David Cole wrote: :>Does any know if suspended SRB control blocks (SSRB/SSRX) are :>stabilized by holding the LOCAL lock? (I'm considering logic in :>support of setting up TRAP2 debugging for SRBs.) I am also curious to know what "owner serialized" means.

SSRB/SSRX and LOCAL locks question

2023-05-30 Thread David Cole
Does any know if suspended SRB control blocks (SSRB/SSRX) are stabilized by holding the LOCAL lock? (I'm considering logic in support of setting up TRAP2 debugging for SRBs.) Thanks, Dave Cole -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe /